Was purpose of Constitution to make liberals illegal?

The Constitution was written by Liberals
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HAHAHahahahahaha... Prove it? Then prove they were liberals in terms of liberals today.
Waiting for your fail.
The FF were none of what we see today if anything.
They weren't.
For one thing..Liberals today do not believe in slave ownership.
But they -strongly- support the creation and continuation of involuntary servitude.
 
The purpose of the Constitution:

To form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

Little, if any, of this is on the liberal agenda.
 
The Constitution was written by Liberals


Brutus: if so they were liberals who wanted a very tiny government!

Maybe you should read the Constitution. The federal government has some very broad powers and is supreme over the states.
Pure garbage.

See: 9th & 10th Amendments.

Actually the 9th Amendment only talks about rights, and it says nothing about states.

The 10th amendment is about powers reserved to people and the states, and says nothing about rights

Might try reading up :eusa_whistle:
 
The purpose of the Constitution:

To form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

Little, if any, of this is on the liberal agenda.

Of course liberals would argue that none of it is on the conservative agenda

Great country...ain't it?
 
Maybe you should read the Constitution. The federal government has some very broad powers and is supreme over the states.
Pure garbage.

See: 9th & 10th Amendments.

Actually the 9th Amendment only talks about rights, and it says nothing about states.

The 10th amendment is about powers reserved to people and the states, and says nothing about rights

Might try reading up :eusa_whistle:
I've read up...For comprehension, no less.

Something you might want to take another whack at.
 
Oh, and for you pinheads out there who claim that fake Fabian socialist/progressive "liberalism" is the same one practiced by the nation's founders, I have a few news flashes for you:

Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What Is Classical Liberalism? | Publications | National Center for Policy Analysis | NCPA

Classical Liberalism

Liberals are the same...the issues and remedies are different

Conservatives never change though, always on the wrong side of history
 
Wrong.

When your "remedies" involve the expropriation of resources and/or property from one group of individuals, in order to feather the nests of another group of individuals (the bedrock of modern fake "liberalism"), then you are as ILliberal as they come.
 
Wrong.

When your "remedies" involve the expropriation of resources and/or property from one group of individuals, in order to feather the nests of another group of individuals (the bedrock of modern fake "liberalism"), then you are as ILliberal as they come.

Where is property being taken? Where is wealth being confiscated?
 
Wrong.

When your "remedies" involve the expropriation of resources and/or property from one group of individuals, in order to feather the nests of another group of individuals (the bedrock of modern fake "liberalism"), then you are as ILliberal as they come.
Correct. Classical liberalism has -nothing- to do with forcing people to provide others the means necessry to exercise their rights.

Modern liberalism? It openly supports placing certain people into a condition of involuntary servitude, and as such, openly opposes liberty.
 
Wrong.

When your "remedies" involve the expropriation of resources and/or property from one group of individuals, in order to feather the nests of another group of individuals (the bedrock of modern fake "liberalism"), then you are as ILliberal as they come.
Correct. Classical liberalism has -nothing- to do with forcing people to provide others the means necessry to exercise their rights.

Modern liberalism? It openly supports placing certain people into a condition of involuntary servitude, and as such, openly opposes liberty.

Involuntary servitude?

Do tell....
 
The Constitution was written by Liberals
Classical liberals (i.e. libertarians), not 20th century Fabian socialist/progressive "liberals".

You know this and may now cease and desist spreading that half-truth.

If the left stop spreading half-truths, they have nothing left to say.


Oh.

Wait.

Yea.... I see where this is going and it is good. :lol:


ironic that you posted only 1/2 of the truth


both the left and the right are guilty of ONLY posting information/facts that help their cause while going out of their way to hide any information and facts that do NOT hep their cause.


something that you just did.

something that you do all the time.
 
Rikules: both the left and the right are guilty of ONLY posting information/facts that help their cause while going out of their way to hide any information and facts that do NOT hep their cause.

Brutus: sure but the left must hide that their ideology is essentially anti-American and that is a far far greater burden than conservatives face.
 

Forum List

Back
Top