Was obama The Reason The LEFT Turned Into Full Blown Socialists?

did I miss the moment where Obama or ANYONE in the democratic party called for government ownership and control of the means of production and control of our economy?

Government ownership;
The Gov. owns 26% of GM stock, refused to sell it back to GM when thay asked to buy them back.
Fannie Mae
Farmer Mac
Federal Home Loan Banks
Freddie Mac

Regulations control the means of production and control of our economy.
This administration has gone, over the top crazy, with them.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
The left has pride left at all. They are now full blown socialists and communists. We also know that their messiah is a full blown spread the wealth around, tax the rich, redistribute the wealth, out of control big government spender, and they love him, dear leader, he gives them things for FREE. If the democrats of 30 years ago could see what kind of people the democrats of today have become, they'd roll over in their graves. I'm just waiting for the swastikas on arm bands at obama rallies. That's all that's missing.

ObamatheFacist.jpg


barack-obama-making-america-communist11.jpg


Obama-the-Marxist1.jpg

was obama the reason you turned into a whining pussy, pole?
 
did I miss the moment where Obama or ANYONE in the democratic party called for government ownership and control of the means of production and control of our economy?

Government ownership;
The Gov. owns 26% of GM stock, refused to sell it back to GM when thay asked to buy them back.
Fannie Mae
Farmer Mac
Federal Home Loan Banks
Freddie Mac

Regulations control the means of production and control of our economy.
This administration has gone, over the top crazy, with them.
does the government OWN any industry? Not ONE. However, would the mere fact that some government might, in fact, even own AN industry make the place where that government governs a bastion of socialism? Is that what it takes? A simple yes or no would suffice.
 
Last edited:
did I miss the moment where Obama or ANYONE in the democratic party called for government ownership and control of the means of production and control of our economy?

Government ownership;
The Gov. owns 26% of GM stock, refused to sell it back to GM when they asked to buy them back.
Fannie Mae
Farmer Mac
Federal Home Loan Banks
Freddie Mac

Regulations control the means of production and control of our economy.
This administration has gone, over the top crazy, with them.
does the government OWN any industry? Not ONE. However, would the mere fact that some government might, in fact, even own AN industry make the place where that government governs a bastion of socialism? Is that what it takes? A simple yes or no would suffice.

They do when the own 26% of the stock.
A government-owned corporation
GOCs can be fully owned or partially owned by Government.
26% of stocks in GM is partially owned by our Gov.
This a Socialism
 
Last edited:
The left has pride left at all. They are now full blown socialists and communists. We also know that their messiah is a full blown spread the wealth around, tax the rich, redistribute the wealth, out of control big government spender, and they love him, dear leader, he gives them things for FREE. If the democrats of 30 years ago could see what kind of people the democrats of today have become, they'd roll over in their graves. I'm just waiting for the swastikas on arm bands at obama rallies. That's all that's missing.


It's probably a reaction to conservatives becoming fascists. It all balances itself out, you see.
 
Government ownership;
The Gov. owns 26% of GM stock, refused to sell it back to GM when thay asked to buy them back.
Fannie Mae
Farmer Mac
Federal Home Loan Banks
Freddie Mac

Regulations control the means of production and control of our economy.
This administration has gone, over the top crazy, with them.
does the government OWN any industry? Not ONE. However, would the mere fact that some government might, in fact, even own AN industry make the place where that government governs a bastion of socialism? Is that what it takes? A simple yes or no would suffice.

They do when the own 26% of the stock.
A government-owned corporation
GOCs can be fully owned or partially owned by Government.
26% of stocks in GM is partially owned by our Gov.

so... if some government owned 100% of some industry, that government would DEFINITELY be a bastion of socialism? Is that correct? yes or no
 
does the government OWN any industry? Not ONE. However, would the mere fact that some government might, in fact, even own AN industry make the place where that government governs a bastion of socialism? Is that what it takes? A simple yes or no would suffice.

They do when the own 26% of the stock.
A government-owned corporation
GOCs can be fully owned or partially owned by Government.
26% of stocks in GM is partially owned by our Gov.

so... if some government owned 100% of some industry, that government would DEFINITELY be a bastion of socialism? Is that correct? yes or no

No - that would be full blown communism.
 
They do when the own 26% of the stock.
A government-owned corporation
GOCs can be fully owned or partially owned by Government.
26% of stocks in GM is partially owned by our Gov.

so... if some government owned 100% of some industry, that government would DEFINITELY be a bastion of socialism? Is that correct? yes or no

No - that would be full blown communism.

Got it.

So... I guess that if I went to places like Iola, Kansas or Independence, Missouri or Huntsville, Alabama or Johnson City, Tennessee or Lincoln, Nebraska, I'd find the students in the public schools in those towns looking up at pictures of Marx, Lenin and Mao on the walls. Every single one of those municipalities OWNS the electrical power generation/distribution system within their jurisdictions. Not some publicly traded utility where capitalists could buy and sell shares of stock...but the government... the filthy communists living in those towns... actually own the entire means of production and distribution of natural gas and or electricity. Who KNEW we had godless commies living in our midst in towns like that?

Oh, and just so you know.... 26% of stock in any corporation does not give you or anyone else control over that corporation. only one share more than 50% gets anybody control.
 
obama wasn't the reason the left turned into full blown socialists. They were always full blown socialists. obama is just the power that will help them realize their long held dreams.
 
obama wasn't the reason the left turned into full blown socialists. They were always full blown socialists. obama is just the power that will help them realize their long held dreams.

Watching too much bullshit fox news? You do know that Glenn Beck was fired for being so full of shit, right?

If the left are socialists, then the right are equally as fascist. Consider neither of these are true, you might want to come back to reality.
 
so... if some government owned 100% of some industry, that government would DEFINITELY be a bastion of socialism? Is that correct? yes or no

No - that would be full blown communism.

Got it.

So... I guess that if I went to places like Iola, Kansas or Independence, Missouri or Huntsville, Alabama or Johnson City, Tennessee or Lincoln, Nebraska, I'd find the students in the public schools in those towns looking up at pictures of Marx, Lenin and Mao on the walls. Every single one of those municipalities OWNS the electrical power generation/distribution system within their jurisdictions. Not some publicly traded utility where capitalists could buy and sell shares of stock...but the government... the filthy communists living in those towns... actually own the entire means of production and distribution of natural gas and or electricity. Who KNEW we had godless commies living in our midst in towns like that?

Oh, and just so you know.... 26% of stock in any corporation does not give you or anyone else control over that corporation. only one share more than 50% gets anybody control.

Why do you equate communist leaders pictures in schools to us? It isn't relevant to this discussion.
You need to read up on the difference between state and Federal government.
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We have been inching toward socialism for over a hundred years.
I never said that the government controls GM. I said they own stocks.
Federal government owning stocks no matter how much or how little, is a form of socialism.
When our Federal Government owns stock in any company that is a form of socialism.
 
No - that would be full blown communism.

Got it.

So... I guess that if I went to places like Iola, Kansas or Independence, Missouri or Huntsville, Alabama or Johnson City, Tennessee or Lincoln, Nebraska, I'd find the students in the public schools in those towns looking up at pictures of Marx, Lenin and Mao on the walls. Every single one of those municipalities OWNS the electrical power generation/distribution system within their jurisdictions. Not some publicly traded utility where capitalists could buy and sell shares of stock...but the government... the filthy communists living in those towns... actually own the entire means of production and distribution of natural gas and or electricity. Who KNEW we had godless commies living in our midst in towns like that?

Oh, and just so you know.... 26% of stock in any corporation does not give you or anyone else control over that corporation. only one share more than 50% gets anybody control.

Why do you equate communist leaders pictures in schools to us? It isn't relevant to this discussion.
You need to read up on the difference between state and Federal government.
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We have been inching toward socialism for over a hundred years.
I never said that the government controls GM. I said they own stocks.
Federal government owning stocks no matter how much or how little, is a form of socialism.
When our Federal Government owns stock in any company that is a form of socialism.

bull. "a form or socialism" is a made up distinction. Socialism REQUIRES government ownership and control of ALL the means of production. Even if the government DID own 100% of AN industry, that STILL would not be even "socialism", let alone "full blown communism" as you so totally erroneously suggested. When Harry Truman temporarily nationalized the steel industry back in 1952, we did not become a communist nation. You need to take a freshman level class on comparative political systems and learn the actual real meaning of the words you so ridiculously toss around.
 
:rofl:

Nutters....

You clowns are why the GOP is drowning.

There are even a few GObP who are admitting the same.

The average rw here has no idea of the meaning of the labels they toss around. If they did, they would be whining that Obama is a lousy "Communist" slash "Socialist". If they would educate themselves about, for example, ACA vs Reagan's SOCIALIST health care plan, they just might shut up about ACA.

But, alas and alack, if there's one thing we have learned about the radical right is that they take great pride in their ignorance. For them, its a badge, something they can belong to so they don't feel so alone in the big mean world.
 
obama wasn't the reason the left turned into full blown socialists. They were always full blown socialists. obama is just the power that will help them realize their long held dreams.

Watching too much bullshit fox news? You do know that Glenn Beck was fired for being so full of shit, right?

If the left are socialists, then the right are equally as fascist. Consider neither of these are true, you might want to come back to reality.

Glenn Beck was not fired. His contract ran out and he decided not to renew it. He still comes on Fox new from time to time.
Keith Olbermann was fried from MSNBC.
 
obama wasn't the reason the left turned into full blown socialists. They were always full blown socialists. obama is just the power that will help them realize their long held dreams.

LIAR.

PROVE IT.

I DARE YOU.

You can't because you are a LIAR.
 
Got it.

So... I guess that if I went to places like Iola, Kansas or Independence, Missouri or Huntsville, Alabama or Johnson City, Tennessee or Lincoln, Nebraska, I'd find the students in the public schools in those towns looking up at pictures of Marx, Lenin and Mao on the walls. Every single one of those municipalities OWNS the electrical power generation/distribution system within their jurisdictions. Not some publicly traded utility where capitalists could buy and sell shares of stock...but the government... the filthy communists living in those towns... actually own the entire means of production and distribution of natural gas and or electricity. Who KNEW we had godless commies living in our midst in towns like that?

Oh, and just so you know.... 26% of stock in any corporation does not give you or anyone else control over that corporation. only one share more than 50% gets anybody control.

Why do you equate communist leaders pictures in schools to us? It isn't relevant to this discussion.
You need to read up on the difference between state and Federal government.
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We have been inching toward socialism for over a hundred years.
I never said that the government controls GM. I said they own stocks.
Federal government owning stocks no matter how much or how little, is a form of socialism.
When our Federal Government owns stock in any company that is a form of socialism.

bull. "a form or socialism" is a made up distinction. Socialism REQUIRES government ownership and control of ALL the means of production. Even if the government DID own 100% of AN industry, that STILL would not be even "socialism", let alone "full blown communism" as you so totally erroneously suggested. When Harry Truman temporarily nationalized the steel industry back in 1952, we did not become a communist nation. You need to take a freshman level class on comparative political systems and learn the actual real meaning of the words you so ridiculously toss around.

Tell that to the older immigrants that have come to America. They recognize for what it it is.
It is you who will not see it for what it is and you who needs to be educated.
 

Forum List

Back
Top