probably not , by even the expansive standards floated by the UN when it comes to US democratic presidents ( and the French) but I think he did the right thing. To bad Muslims don't seem to recall any of that....
Europe as a whole owes yet another debt to the United States for not allowing the Balkans to devolve into chaos.
Er, sorry, what's this? Clinton was in fact very reluctant to intervene in the Balkans. It was the British that pushed for military strikes against paramilitary and government positions. Tony Blair publically forced Clinton into acting through the American media.
Oh and, Sallow. Europe doesn't owe "yet another debt to the United States". The Balkans owes nothing to the United States, the United Kingdom or any other NATO military that took part in that absolute and irredeemable disaster that was the NATO intervention in the Balkans. NATO forces largely stood by and watched as hundreds of thousands of civilians were slaughtered under the very noses of those who were 'supposed' to protect them, but couldn't because the UN didn't want to risk taking sides.
Honestly, it's times like these when one really does despair at how undeniably stupid American's can be.
Oh and, Trajan. It's spelt 'cheque', not "check".
You are recalling the UN (Dutch in particular) pre-December-1995-Dayton-Accord failure to protect anything from the astonishingly barbaric Serbs. Frankly, I cannot imagine how anyone would be surprised about the Dutch Army's inability to protect anything as they are armed primarily with brass tubas and hash-laced brownies.
In 1996, NATO troop entered Bosnia to enforce the Dayton Accords. Unlike the UN before them, they did not "stand by and watch as hundreds and thousands of civilians were slaughtered."
You clearly need to brush up on your history.