Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

So how did Oswald shoot him in the face from behind again ?

He was not shot in the face

The bullet entered his head from above and behind.

Oswald's bullet went through the back of his neck and according to the single bullet theorists made 7 more entry/exit wounds between two men.;


OK...your turn

Show where a shot fired from any location other than the SBD could have made those wounds



Assassins were all around the route on Elm Street. One of the few buildings that DIDN'T have a CIA/Mafia assassin was the school book depository.

AND if anyone can say with a straight face that JFK was hit in the back of the head when it's BLATANTLY obvious that the kill shot was to the right side of the head, at close range while firing upwards.

Dumb fucks that believe a single bullet fired from the same gun zig-zagged to and fro going from one victim to another with small entry wounds but would have us believe that a bullet fired from where they claim was directly behind JFK hit the right side of his head and nearly took it off? GTFO already.

Some people just need to believe that their beloved corporate "gubermint" is pristine, without sin, without a blemish...helps them sleep better at night.

You Goofy
 
So how did Oswald shoot him in the face from behind again ?

He was not shot in the face

The bullet entered his head from above and behind.

Oswald's bullet went through the back of his neck and according to the single bullet theorists made 7 more entry/exit wounds between two men.;


OK...your turn

Show where a shot fired from any location other than the SBD could have made those wounds



Assassins were all around the route on Elm Street. One of the few buildings that DIDN'T have a CIA/Mafia assassin was the school book depository.

AND if anyone can say with a straight face that JFK was hit in the back of the head when it's BLATANTLY obvious that the kill shot was to the right side of the head, at close range while firing upwards.

Dumb fucks that believe a single bullet fired from the same gun zig-zagged to and fro going from one victim to another with small entry wounds but would have us believe that a bullet fired from where they claim was directly behind JFK hit the right side of his head and nearly took it off? GTFO already.

Some people just need to believe that their beloved corporate "gubermint" is pristine, without sin, without a blemish...helps them sleep better at night.



You Goofy



You stooooopid.
 
No other location could have allowed a bullet to hit Connally in the right leg.
Especially the Grassy Knoll
 
[


waste of time,this paid shill of Langley does this all the time when you challenge him to read books or watch videos that dont go along with the warren commission-:scared1:
Who's a paid shill from CIA ? And please provide some evidence.

soupnazI and so is his gaylover from san fran the OP WRONGwinger..you are new here OBVIOUSLY.:abgg2q.jpg:
[


waste of time,this paid shill of Langley does this all the time when you challenge him to read books or watch videos that dont go along with the warren commission-:scared1:
Who's a paid shill from CIA ? And please provide some evidence.

soupnazI and so is his gaylover from san fran the OP WRONGwinger..you are new here OBVIOUSLY.:abgg2q.jpg:

Yes he is new to your childishness.

Of course he asked for evidence and like gipper and the others you can provide none.
 
This from the former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury, is right on the mark.

I wonder how many Americans know about Project Northwoods.



NO EXPERT OR INFORMED PERSON BELIEVES THE OBVIOUSLY FALSE STORY THAT OSWALD ASSASSINATED JFK!!!

The likely result will be comparable to the US Congress’ belated investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. No expert or informed person believed the obviously false story that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President Kennedy. All evidence pointed to a plot by the Joint Chiefs, CIA, and Secret Service whose right-wing leaders had concluded that President Kennedy was too “soft on communism” to do what was necessary for the US to prevail in the contest with the Soviet Union. Expert and public disbelief of the official story was so great that in 1976, 13 years after Kennedy’s assassination, Congress investigated. The real culprits were, of course, not identified, but two important results were forthcoming. One was the conclusion by the Select Committee on Assassinations that President Kennedy was the victim of a conspiracy and not of a lone gunman. The other was the release of the top secret Project Northwoods, which revealed the Joint Chiefs’ plan presented to President Kennedy for the US government to kill US citizens and shoot down US airliners and place the blame on Castro in order to gain public acceptance for an invasion of Cuba.

The conclusion that a conspiracy, although unidentified, was involved in Kennedy’s assassination was the sop thrown to those who disputed the official lone gunman account. The revelation of Project Northwoods created awareness of a previously unknown US government plot that drew attention away from Kennedy’s assassination.

9/11: Finally the Truth Comes Out? - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
What does that have to do with Oswald acting alone?

You think CIA did it.......show any assistance Oswald received from anyone

CIA was involved, there would have been a car waiting outside the TSD and Oswald would have never been seen again


Holy shit.......you are so fucking dense and I am not saying that just because you believe in "magic bullets" . You can't even grasp the meaning of "patsy".
He’s stuck on Ruby stalking the halls of Parkland, because of his love for JFK. LMFAO.

Can’t fix stupid.
No one is stuck on it but you.

he may or not have been there but it is irrelevant
 
So how did Oswald shoot him in the face from behind again ?

He was not shot in the face

The bullet entered his head from above and behind.

Oswald's bullet went through the back of his neck and according to the single bullet theorists made 7 more entry/exit wounds between two men.;


OK...your turn

Show where a shot fired from any location other than the SBD could have made those wounds



Assassins were all around the route on Elm Street. One of the few buildings that DIDN'T have a CIA/Mafia assassin was the school book depository.

AND if anyone can say with a straight face that JFK was hit in the back of the head when it's BLATANTLY obvious that the kill shot was to the right side of the head, at close range while firing upwards.

Dumb fucks that believe a single bullet fired from the same gun zig-zagged to and fro going from one victim to another with small entry wounds but would have us believe that a bullet fired from where they claim was directly behind JFK hit the right side of his head and nearly took it off? GTFO already.

Some people just need to believe that their beloved corporate "gubermint" is pristine, without sin, without a blemish...helps them sleep better at night.

You have no evidence of any other assassin but there is overwhelming evidence fired from the TSBD.

Kennedy was shot in the back of the head as the film and autopsy evidence and all other physical evidence proves.

It was physically impossible for anyone to have fired UPWARDS from his right front into the head without being seen on the zapruder film. Such a shot would have had to have come from the street and no one was there with a gun,


You believe the story of a bullet zig zagging. The Warren Commission made no such claim that it zig zagged. Bullets often do hit more than one person.

Also no one ever said he was shot at from DIRECTLY behind. The bullet was never pristine either it was always and still is damaged in a manner perfectly consistent with having hit to men.You cannot even argue effectively because you have no idea what the people proven you wrong are saying.

In fact you are an uninformed clueless dunce about the entire issue.

Your only argument is that you hate the government which is not evidence or even an argument.
 
Most people vaguely know about the Zapruder film, but it will soon become omnipresent as the 50th anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy approaches. What is not well known, however, is that a single frame of it was kept largely secret from public view for 12 years after the assassination.

snip

Still, it was not until 1975 that Geraldo—yes, that Geraldo, Geraldo Rivera got hold of a copy of the uncut Zapruder film and played it for a national audience on his show, “Good Night America.” Which resulted in a kind of collective national gasp as millions of Americans simultaneously saw something that they had previously only read about.



I can't post url links yet
That is simply false there was never a frame kept secret or removed from it.

The myth of a frame being removed stems from a simple mishap where one frame was reversed and the error later corrected but your claim is false

There was nothing significant about what the ass clown geraldo showed.
 
He was not shot in the face

The bullet entered his head from above and behind.
Oswald's bullet went through the back of his neck and according to the single bullet theorists made 7 more entry/exit wounds between two men.;

OK...your turn

Show where a shot fired from any location other than the SBD could have made those wounds


Assassins were all around the route on Elm Street. One of the few buildings that DIDN'T have a CIA/Mafia assassin was the school book depository.

AND if anyone can say with a straight face that JFK was hit in the back of the head when it's BLATANTLY obvious that the kill shot was to the right side of the head, at close range while firing upwards.

Dumb fucks that believe a single bullet fired from the same gun zig-zagged to and fro going from one victim to another with small entry wounds but would have us believe that a bullet fired from where they claim was directly behind JFK hit the right side of his head and nearly took it off? GTFO already.

Some people just need to believe that their beloved corporate "gubermint" is pristine, without sin, without a blemish...helps them sleep better at night.


You Goofy


You stooooopid.
Yet I prove you wrong every time.

You still have no evidence of any kind.'

you have never even tried to post evidence and can only repeat proven myth.

Where is your evidence ?
 
So how did Oswald shoot him in the face from behind again ?

He was not shot in the face

The bullet entered his head from above and behind.

Oswald's bullet went through the back of his neck and according to the single bullet theorists made 7 more entry/exit wounds between two men.;


OK...your turn

Show where a shot fired from any location other than the SBD could have made those wounds



Assassins were all around the route on Elm Street. One of the few buildings that DIDN'T have a CIA/Mafia assassin was the school book depository.

AND if anyone can say with a straight face that JFK was hit in the back of the head when it's BLATANTLY obvious that the kill shot was to the right side of the head, at close range while firing upwards.

Dumb fucks that believe a single bullet fired from the same gun zig-zagged to and fro going from one victim to another with small entry wounds but would have us believe that a bullet fired from where they claim was directly behind JFK hit the right side of his head and nearly took it off? GTFO already.

Some people just need to believe that their beloved corporate "gubermint" is pristine, without sin, without a blemish...helps them sleep better at night.

You Goofy

Yet I own your sorry little ass.
 
So how did Oswald shoot him in the face from behind again ?

He was not shot in the face

The bullet entered his head from above and behind.

Oswald's bullet went through the back of his neck and according to the single bullet theorists made 7 more entry/exit wounds between two men.;


OK...your turn

Show where a shot fired from any location other than the SBD could have made those wounds



Assassins were all around the route on Elm Street. One of the few buildings that DIDN'T have a CIA/Mafia assassin was the school book depository.

AND if anyone can say with a straight face that JFK was hit in the back of the head when it's BLATANTLY obvious that the kill shot was to the right side of the head, at close range while firing upwards.

Dumb fucks that believe a single bullet fired from the same gun zig-zagged to and fro going from one victim to another with small entry wounds but would have us believe that a bullet fired from where they claim was directly behind JFK hit the right side of his head and nearly took it off? GTFO already.

Some people just need to believe that their beloved corporate "gubermint" is pristine, without sin, without a blemish...helps them sleep better at night.

NOBODY believes that the government is sinless and without corruption.

Your argument is weak and lame because you assume to be enlightened and know better than others about how bad the government is but you are not.

Saying the government is bad and corrupt does not prove your ludicrous claims about JFK. You need evidence and you absolutely refuse to pony up and cite any because you do not have any.

You dream up many lies but that would not be evidence of a specific crime is you were accused of one and the same logic applies.

Stop the bullshit and cough up some evidence.
 
Nobody denies he was shot twice
Well it's a 2 minute undoctored video that speaks for itself.
I drew my conclusion years ago - the JFK murder was a coup d 'etat against our nation, and even if it wasn't --this is what it amounted to.
How did it amount to a coup d’ etat?

LBJ was sworn in within hours and the nation continued on its way
Democracy worked
 
Nobody denies he was shot twice
Well it's a 2 minute undoctored video that speaks for itself.
I drew my conclusion years ago - the JFK murder was a coup d 'etat against our nation, and even if it wasn't --this is what it amounted to.
It was always known he was shot twice.

That film shows nothing which was not already known

There is no evidence of a coup or conspiracy

The evidence shows Oswald acted alone
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top