dilloduck
Diamond Member
You want me to start telling guys they are, uh, small? I'm afraid. Very afraid.
and fat people they're too fat etc.---------We can do a sideline business treating depression !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You want me to start telling guys they are, uh, small? I'm afraid. Very afraid.
So you agree with phone # for small men and wrinkled people sewn in, because they can lead to depression? That is the same as warning the obese that way, because it can lead to health problems down the road.
and fat people they're too fat etc.---------We can do a sideline business treating depression !
So we should have Overeaters Anonymous stations in front of every Taco Bell and Alcholics Anonymous meetings in front of bars?
And while we're at it, let's give out bibles in front of no-tell motels so we can "help" the sinners.
Hmmm. I hadn't thought about the potential plunder from insulting people about their self-evident problems. Got any start-up $$?
Any of those ventures would be fine, if done by private citizens of their own will. I do not advocate a government mandate for any of these actions, including clothing labels.
It's cool---me an abbey got this all worked out. We offend em then fix em if they want it.
Obesity is, in itself, a health problem. I do not think the government should mandate warning labels in clothing; however, I do not think it is "mean" to offer a help number in a discreet fashion such as a label. Such a label would be likely to reach the target audience because there is a direct relationship between extra large clothing and obese people.
As for the examples of the elderly and men with smaller penises:
1)A label would not necessarily reach the target audience. A man could be very small in stature, and still be well-endowed, or vice versa. Different elderly people have different taste in clothing, and it would be difficult to pinpoint a certain audience.
2) Small penises are not a health risk, and there is not a strong relationship between small penis size and depression. Likewise, droopy skin is not a health risk, and does not necessarily lead to depression.
Okay! Can I get a share of the profits, since I was defending the offending?
Any of those ventures would be fine, if done by private citizens of their own will. I do not advocate a government mandate for any of these actions, including clothing labels.
No. Those things are NOT fine. Didn't work so good when Carrie Nation did it either.
From what I've heard, the overwhelming number of health problems that result from obesity occur down the road. However, depression from something that you cannot fix, such as a tiny penis, might be rather immediate. If we are going to sew in these helpful numbers, I think a depression help-line in underwear for such men is more urgent.
The logistics of reaching a target audience, while a good point, are a separate issue from the threshhold issue of whether the #'s should or should not be sewn in.
Btw, I think this is our first debate. Love you!
Sure----you can be in charge of after care appts and stuff !!!
No. Those things are NOT fine. Didn't work so good when Carrie Nation did it either.
Can I work from home? And what about bennies?
This IS your benny !!!!
Please provide me with a clearer comparison between what I am advocating and the actions of Carrie Nation.
So we should have Overeaters Anonymous stations in front of every Taco Bell and Alcholics Anonymous meetings in front of bars?
And while we're at it, let's give out bibles in front of no-tell motels so we can "help" the sinners.
There are Gamblers Anonymous offices at casinos in Canada, or at least in Quebec......where EVERYTHING is government mandated.
I didn't know that. How's it working out for them?