Warmists Hung Out To Dry

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
How long have we on the Right been claiming that 'Global Warming' is a political scam?
Right....forever.

Now...here is Steven E. Koonin, who served as under secretary for science in Obama’s Department of Energy from 2009 to 2011.

1. "Claims that 2016 was “the hottest year on record” are drawing sharp criticism from scientists who say it reflects how global warming has become more social crusade than evidence-based science.

2. “The Obama administration relentlessly politicized science and it aggressively pushed a campaign about that politicized science,” said Steven E. Koonin, ....

3. ...also blamed a “happily complicit” media for trumpeting the now-departed Obama administration’s dubious claim.

4. ....National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a report declaring that “the globally averaged temperature over land and ocean surfaces for 2016 was the highest among all years since record-keeping began in 1880.”

5. NOAA fixed the 2016 increase at 0.04 degrees Celsius. The British Met Office reported 0.04 degrees Celsius Both increases are well within the margin of error for such calculations, approximately 0.1 degrees, and therefore are dismissed by many scientists as meaningless.



6. ....USA Today wrote that “the planet sizzled to its third straight record warm year in 2016.” The New York Times’ front-page headline said, “Earth Sets Temperature Record for Third Straight Year.” The article declared that the latest readings were “trouncing” earlier numbers and the planet had thus “blown past” the previous records.

Such characterizations are absurd, according to Richard Lindzen, a meteorology professor at MIT....


7. “It’s typical misleading nonsense,” Lindzen said in an e-mail. “We’re talking about less than a tenth of degree with an uncertainty of about a quarter of a degree. Moreover, such small fluctuations – even if real – don’t change the fact that the trend for the past 20 years has been much less than models have predicted.”



8.
“The White House positions, the press releases, the published stories – all of that is not exactly inaccurate but it is promoting something considerably less alarming or certain than the layperson might conclude from reading it all.”
Scientists Criticize 'Hottest Year on Record' Claim as Hype | RealClearInvestigations




Soooo.....the above is the answer to the riddle...'when is science not science.'
 
How long have we on the Right been claiming that 'Global Warming' is a political scam?
Right....forever.

Now...here is Steven E. Koonin, who served as under secretary for science in Obama’s Department of Energy from 2009 to 2011.

1. "Claims that 2016 was “the hottest year on record” are drawing sharp criticism from scientists who say it reflects how global warming has become more social crusade than evidence-based science.

2. “The Obama administration relentlessly politicized science and it aggressively pushed a campaign about that politicized science,” said Steven E. Koonin, ....

3. ...also blamed a “happily complicit” media for trumpeting the now-departed Obama administration’s dubious claim.

4. ....National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a report declaring that “the globally averaged temperature over land and ocean surfaces for 2016 was the highest among all years since record-keeping began in 1880.”

5. NOAA fixed the 2016 increase at 0.04 degrees Celsius. The British Met Office reported 0.04 degrees Celsius Both increases are well within the margin of error for such calculations, approximately 0.1 degrees, and therefore are dismissed by many scientists as meaningless.



6. ....USA Today wrote that “the planet sizzled to its third straight record warm year in 2016.” The New York Times’ front-page headline said, “Earth Sets Temperature Record for Third Straight Year.” The article declared that the latest readings were “trouncing” earlier numbers and the planet had thus “blown past” the previous records.

Such characterizations are absurd, according to Richard Lindzen, a meteorology professor at MIT....


7. “It’s typical misleading nonsense,” Lindzen said in an e-mail. “We’re talking about less than a tenth of degree with an uncertainty of about a quarter of a degree. Moreover, such small fluctuations – even if real – don’t change the fact that the trend for the past 20 years has been much less than models have predicted.”



8.
“The White House positions, the press releases, the published stories – all of that is not exactly inaccurate but it is promoting something considerably less alarming or certain than the layperson might conclude from reading it all.”
Scientists Criticize 'Hottest Year on Record' Claim as Hype | RealClearInvestigations




Soooo.....the above is the answer to the riddle...'when is science not science.'
Whenever RaTz can get their furry paws on it and spin it for their own gain.
 
How long have we on the Right been claiming that 'Global Warming' is a political scam?
Right....forever.

Now...here is Steven E. Koonin, who served as under secretary for science in Obama’s Department of Energy from 2009 to 2011.

1. "Claims that 2016 was “the hottest year on record” are drawing sharp criticism from scientists who say it reflects how global warming has become more social crusade than evidence-based science.

2. “The Obama administration relentlessly politicized science and it aggressively pushed a campaign about that politicized science,” said Steven E. Koonin, ....

3. ...also blamed a “happily complicit” media for trumpeting the now-departed Obama administration’s dubious claim.

4. ....National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a report declaring that “the globally averaged temperature over land and ocean surfaces for 2016 was the highest among all years since record-keeping began in 1880.”

5. NOAA fixed the 2016 increase at 0.04 degrees Celsius. The British Met Office reported 0.04 degrees Celsius Both increases are well within the margin of error for such calculations, approximately 0.1 degrees, and therefore are dismissed by many scientists as meaningless.



6. ....USA Today wrote that “the planet sizzled to its third straight record warm year in 2016.” The New York Times’ front-page headline said, “Earth Sets Temperature Record for Third Straight Year.” The article declared that the latest readings were “trouncing” earlier numbers and the planet had thus “blown past” the previous records.

Such characterizations are absurd, according to Richard Lindzen, a meteorology professor at MIT....


7. “It’s typical misleading nonsense,” Lindzen said in an e-mail. “We’re talking about less than a tenth of degree with an uncertainty of about a quarter of a degree. Moreover, such small fluctuations – even if real – don’t change the fact that the trend for the past 20 years has been much less than models have predicted.”



8.
“The White House positions, the press releases, the published stories – all of that is not exactly inaccurate but it is promoting something considerably less alarming or certain than the layperson might conclude from reading it all.”
Scientists Criticize 'Hottest Year on Record' Claim as Hype | RealClearInvestigations




Soooo.....the above is the answer to the riddle...'when is science not science.'
Whenever RaTz can get their furry paws on it and spin it for their own gain.


....or power.
 
And all that ignorant flap yap will not change the warming one bit. Sea Ice at both poles is at record lows for this time of year. 2014 was the warmest year on record. Until 2015. And then came 2016. Three record years in a row. Extreme weather events have become the norm. And the whole time, our ignoramuses like PC continually yap about 'alternative facts. 'Facts' that stink, as they pulled them out of their ass.
 
And all that ignorant flap yap will not change the warming one bit. Sea Ice at both poles is at record lows for this time of year. 2014 was the warmest year on record. Until 2015. And then came 2016. Three record years in a row. Extreme weather events have become the norm. And the whole time, our ignoramuses like PC continually yap about 'alternative facts. 'Facts' that stink, as they pulled them out of their ass.


Let's see....


On one side: Steven E. Koonin, who served as under secretary for science in Obama’s Department of Energy from 2009 to 2011.


On the other side.....you.


Tough choice.
 
And all that ignorant flap yap will not change the warming one bit. Sea Ice at both poles is at record lows for this time of year. 2014 was the warmest year on record. Until 2015. And then came 2016. Three record years in a row. Extreme weather events have become the norm. And the whole time, our ignoramuses like PC continually yap about 'alternative facts. 'Facts' that stink, as they pulled them out of their ass.
What was the Temps in..say 1854? Oh and what kind of instruments did they use to measure them?
 
And all that ignorant flap yap will not change the warming one bit. Sea Ice at both poles is at record lows for this time of year. 2014 was the warmest year on record. Until 2015. And then came 2016. Three record years in a row. Extreme weather events have become the norm. And the whole time, our ignoramuses like PC continually yap about 'alternative facts. 'Facts' that stink, as they pulled them out of their ass.
What was the Temps in..say 1854? Oh and what kind of instruments did they use to measure them?


The Magic 8-Ball???
 
Ah yes, the same Richard Lindzen that took money from the tobacco industry to testify before Congress that it was harmless. That Richard Lindzen. A whore.
 
Ah yes, the same Richard Lindzen that took money from the tobacco industry to testify before Congress that it was harmless. That Richard Lindzen. A whore.


Every single 'warmist' takes money to make their claims.
What do you suppose Liberal monasteries...Universities....pay them for, you dunce!
 
How long have we on the Right been claiming that 'Global Warming' is a political scam?

Yes, you'rve been babbling those cult lies for many years, and been busted for those lies every time. And now you want a repeat? Bring it on, cultist.


A guy with no experience in the climate field, who just makes crap up. That is, a typical denier.

5. NOAA fixed the 2016 increase at 0.04 degrees Celsius. The British Met Office reported 0.04 degrees Celsius Both increases are well within the margin of error for such calculations, approximately 0.1 degrees, and therefore are dismissed by many scientists as meaningless.
Yes, the mysterious 'many scientists' who aren't named. Nobody who understand statistics would say such a stupid thing, hence few scientists would say it.

Such characterizations are absurd, according to Richard Lindzen, a meteorology professor at MIT....
"Paid fossil fuel industry shill tries to earn a bigger paycheck. Film at 11"

Soooo.....the above is the answer to the riddle...'when is science not science.'
When deniers do it. They get busted for fraud every time.

Everyone who knows basic statistics knows you're peddling crap. Sure, you can fool your fellow cultists, because they're remarkably stupid people. You can't, however, fool the people who understand the science and statistics. They know you're telling everyone 2+2=5.

Maybe, 1984 style, you can torture people into believing 2+2=5. Is that your Stalinist master plan?
 
Last edited:
Every single 'warmist' takes money to make their claims.
What do you suppose Liberal monasteries...Universities....pay them for, you dunce!

Every scientist in history has drawn a salary from somewhere.

Yet, you only think it's a problem this time.

Why the raging double standards, hypocrite? Why do you only demand climate scientists take a vow of poverty?
 
What was the Temps in..say 1854? Oh and what kind of instruments did they use to measure them?

Thermometers, for one. And many proxy measurements.

So, do you know what a thermometer is?

(Given their intellect, I have to treat deniers like I'd treat a slow 4-year-old.)

Bitch please they didn't have anything that would measure world wide temps to the hundredth or even the tenth of a degree. Take your left loon nonsense and try to snow someone else
 
Every single 'warmist' takes money to make their claims.
What do you suppose Liberal monasteries...Universities....pay them for, you dunce!

Every scientist in history has drawn a salary from somewhere.

Yet, you only think it's a problem this time.

Why the raging double standards, hypocrite? Why do you only demand climate scientists take a vow of poverty?


This is what your pal, the other imbecile said:

"Ah yes, the same Richard Lindzen that took money from the tobacco industry...."


Yet, you say:
"Every scientist in history has drawn a salary from somewhere.

Yet, you only think it's a problem this time."


I love watching the two of you duke it out!!!
 
There are, occasionally, some mitigating effects happening among the flood of disasters wrought by GW.
Uncharacteristic storms in Ca have gone some way to replacing the snow-melt water that's gone missing.
2543_snowmap20170127-16_standard.jpg


The drought still rages, and this top-up will prolong the agony as farmers continue to flog the dead horse of Ca agriculture.
From NASA: Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Storms filled 37 percent of CA snow-water deficit
 
There are, occasionally, some mitigating effects happening among the flood of disasters wrought by GW.
Uncharacteristic storms in Ca have gone some way to replacing the snow-melt water that's gone missing.
2543_snowmap20170127-16_standard.jpg


The drought still rages, and this top-up will prolong the agony as farmers continue to flog the dead horse of Ca agriculture.
From NASA: Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Storms filled 37 percent of CA snow-water deficit


"Uncharacteristic storms in Ca....."

Soooo.....never happened before?
 
A handy set of graphics that can be understood by even the dedicated deniers out there...
Climate Time Machine


Are you referring to those who deny handing America's sovereignty to the globalists of the United Nations?

Government school grad, huh?
Bet they didn't teach you that the United Nations was a Joseph Stalin inception, did they.

For clarity....how difficult was it for the Left to teach you to follow their orders?
 
"Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation below shows how NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend."
NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000


They needn't have gone to so much trouble.....the simpletons would have gobbled up whatever propaganda they put out.
 

Forum List

Back
Top