War Drums: Obama, 'Last Chance For Iran'...

[paulitician]

U.S. Defines Its Demands for New Round of Talks With Iran


The Obama administration and its European allies plan to open new negotiations with Iran by demanding the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility deep under a mountain, according to American and European diplomats.

They are also calling for a halt in the production of uranium fuel that is considered just a few steps from bomb grade, and the shipment of existing stockpiles of that fuel out of the country, the diplomats said.

That negotiating position will be the opening move in what President Obama has called Iran’s “last chance” to resolve its nuclear confrontation with the United Nations and the West diplomatically. The hard-line approach would require the country’s military leadership to give up the Fordo enrichment plant outside the holy city of Qum, and with it a huge investment in the one facility that is most hardened against airstrikes.

Read More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/w...for-new-round-of-talks-with-iran.html?_r=1&hp
DRUDGE REPORT 2012®

 

[Katzndogz]

All negotiations with Iran are phony. Iran will never negotiate honestly because they don't believe a word that falls from those lying lips.

 

[Ariux]

Negotiation involves some give and take. What is the Jewish-controlled side offering Iran in exchange for Iran giving up their legal right to uranium refinement?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Negotiation involves some give and take. What is the Jewish-controlled side offering Iran in exchange for Iran giving up their legal right to uranium refinement?

Israel already has nukes and they haven't shown a propensity to use them.
While Iran has stated numerous time they want to destroy Israel. And those idiot mullahs are just stupid enough to use them. And whats to stop Iran from "accidentally" losing one and it ending up in terrorist hands.
Then what happens?
I'll tell you what happens since you seem unable to connect the dots. All out nuclear war in the middle east.
Is that a good thing in your mind?
Just because a country is able to produce nukes doesnt mean they have the stability to have them.
It's kinda like giving an assault rifle to a three year old....bad idea.

 

[Unkotare]

Negotiation involves some give and take. What is the Jewish-controlled side offering Iran in exchange for Iran giving up their legal right to uranium refinement?

Go take your pills and STFU, Ron.

 

[JoeB131]

Negotiation involves some give and take. What is the Jewish-controlled side offering Iran in exchange for Iran giving up their legal right to uranium refinement?

Israel already has nukes and they haven't shown a propensity to use them.
While Iran has stated numerous time they want to destroy Israel. And those idiot mullahs are just stupid enough to use them. And whats to stop Iran from "accidentally" losing one and it ending up in terrorist hands.
Then what happens?
I'll tell you what happens since you seem unable to connect the dots. All out nuclear war in the middle east.
Is that a good thing in your mind?
Just because a country is able to produce nukes doesnt mean they have the stability to have them.
It's kinda like giving an assault rifle to a three year old....bad idea.

Um, guy, only one country has ever used nukes on people. that would be this one.

And it probably wasn't justifable, given that Japan was trying to surrender before we nuked it.

I don't think we are in much of a moral position to tell Iran they can't have nukes when all their neighbors have them.

Here's the way the Ayatollah's probalby look at it. Saddam gave up his nukes, and we invaded and killed him anyway. Qadafi gave up his nukes, and we bombed him until he was overthrown and he got killed, too. Kim Jong Il kept his nukes and died peacefully in his bed.