Wall Street Journal: Mueller believes Russians' goal was to help Trump and hinder Hillary Clinton

Ted Frazier

Gold Member
Nov 12, 2016
3,102
620
255
Even the Murdoch-owned conservative Wall Street Journal admits it in this news article:

February 16, 2017:
The charges are the first lodged against Russians in Mr. Mueller’s wide-ranging probe. The people and entities involved are unlikely to face trial because they are based in Russia, but the document serves as a road map of how the special counsel’s office believes Russians operated to help President Donald Trump’s campaign and hinder his opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Russians Charged With Interfering in U.S. Election

The WSJ thus contradicts conservatives USMB arguing that the Russians just didn't take sides.

In this thread, ,we discuss the WSJ article, which I love. Thanks.
 
Say what you will but if the Russian "interference" had anything to do with Hillary losing the election, thank God for that.
 
Even the Murdoch-owned conservative Wall Street Journal admits it in this news article:

February 16, 2017:
The charges are the first lodged against Russians in Mr. Mueller’s wide-ranging probe. The people and entities involved are unlikely to face trial because they are based in Russia, but the document serves as a road map of how the special counsel’s office believes Russians operated to help President Donald Trump’s campaign and hinder his opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Russians Charged With Interfering in U.S. Election

The WSJ thus contradicts conservatives USMB arguing that the Russians just didn't take sides.

In this thread, ,we discuss the WSJ article, which I love. Thanks.
And Obama's interference in Israels election? Maybe Mueller can investigate that next.
 
Even the Murdoch-owned conservative Wall Street Journal admits it in this news article:

February 16, 2017:
The charges are the first lodged against Russians in Mr. Mueller’s wide-ranging probe. The people and entities involved are unlikely to face trial because they are based in Russia, but the document serves as a road map of how the special counsel’s office believes Russians operated to help President Donald Trump’s campaign and hinder his opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Russians Charged With Interfering in U.S. Election

The WSJ thus contradicts conservatives USMB arguing that the Russians just didn't take sides.

In this thread, ,we discuss the WSJ article, which I love. Thanks.
And Obama's interference in Israels election? Maybe Mueller can investigate that next.
Why? Obama was working for the benefit of the U.S.'s interests. Not against it like Trump and Russia.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Even the Murdoch-owned conservative Wall Street Journal admits it in this news article:

February 16, 2017:
The charges are the first lodged against Russians in Mr. Mueller’s wide-ranging probe. The people and entities involved are unlikely to face trial because they are based in Russia, but the document serves as a road map of how the special counsel’s office believes Russians operated to help President Donald Trump’s campaign and hinder his opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Russians Charged With Interfering in U.S. Election

The WSJ thus contradicts conservatives USMB arguing that the Russians just didn't take sides.

In this thread, ,we discuss the WSJ article, which I love. Thanks.
And Obama's interference in Israels election? Maybe Mueller can investigate that next.
Why isn't Netanyahu investigating?
 
Israel's goal was to help Hillary, and that included having CNN give Hillary the debate questions before the debate....

an indisputable case of


1. collusion
2. attempt to undermine the election
3. attempt to alter the outcome of the election
4. foreign influence from a hostile country - the one really behind 911
5. cheating
6. lying
7. hating
 
Even the Murdoch-owned conservative Wall Street Journal admits it in this news article:

February 16, 2017:
The charges are the first lodged against Russians in Mr. Mueller’s wide-ranging probe. The people and entities involved are unlikely to face trial because they are based in Russia, but the document serves as a road map of how the special counsel’s office believes Russians operated to help President Donald Trump’s campaign and hinder his opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Russians Charged With Interfering in U.S. Election

The WSJ thus contradicts conservatives USMB arguing that the Russians just didn't take sides.

In this thread, ,we discuss the WSJ article, which I love. Thanks.
And Obama's interference in Israels election? Maybe Mueller can investigate that next.
Why? Obama was working for the benefit of the U.S.'s interests. Not against it like Trump and Russia.
Sure he was.
 
Russia sees America as a threat and wants to weaken it whenever they get the chance. This is why they supported Trump.

Whaaaa? How would this country have been stronger with Hillary in the White House?
 
Israel's goal was to help Hillary, and that included having CNN give Hillary the debate questions before the debate....

an indisputable case of


1. collusion
2. attempt to undermine the election
3. attempt to alter the outcome of the election
4. foreign influence from a hostile country - the one really behind 911
5. cheating
6. lying
7. hating
Dumbass.
 
Israel's goal was to help Hillary, and that included having CNN give Hillary the debate questions before the debate....

an indisputable case of


1. collusion
2. attempt to undermine the election
3. attempt to alter the outcome of the election
4. foreign influence from a hostile country - the one really behind 911
5. cheating
6. lying
7. hating
You made that up.
 
Russia sees America as a threat and wants to weaken it whenever they get the chance. This is why they supported Trump.
Another backfire. You liberal progressives and Russia have a lot in common.
Weird then, that you'd champion the causes of Russia and not that of liberal progressives.
 
Russia sees America as a threat and wants to weaken it whenever they get the chance. This is why they supported Trump.
Another backfire. You liberal progressives and Russia have a lot in common.
Weird then, that you'd champion the causes of Russia and not that of liberal progressives.
Why is it interesting the liberal progressives are far more dangerous than the Russians.
Far more? So they are not very similar, after all. That's why you support Russia and their continued sabotage of our elections.
 
Meuller's BOSS at the DOJ said the Russian interference did NOT effect the outcome of the election, CASE CLOSED the lying left filth can suck it.
 
Israel's goal was to help Hillary, and that included having CNN give Hillary the debate questions before the debate....

an indisputable case of


1. collusion
2. attempt to undermine the election
3. attempt to alter the outcome of the election
4. foreign influence from a hostile country - the one really behind 911
5. cheating
6. lying
7. hating
You made that up.




You lie... because that is the #2 value of the party you support, a party with precisely four "values..."

1. STEALING
2. LYING
3. HATING
4. DISCRIMINATING



Donna Brazile finally admits she shared debate questions with Clinton campaign

Donna Brazile out at CNN amid leaks to Clinton campaign




So, here we have Democrats LYING about attempting to STEAL the election, HATING those who notice, and DISCRIMINATING against those who post truth about it online....
 
Indeed the Russians may have plotted to intervene with the intent of helping Trump win the election. However in no way does that mean that Trump or his campaign were part of the Russian plot, or even aware that it existed.
It also doesn't mean the Russian efforts made any difference in the outcome.
As the actual indictment states:

"There is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the alleged unlawful activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."

Grand Jury Indicts Thirteen Russian Individuals and Three Russian Companies for Scheme to Interfere in the United States Political System
 

Forum List

Back
Top