Wall Street Bankers Whine That They Shouldn’t Have To Pay For Their Fraud

Discussion in 'Media' started by hvactec, Sep 10, 2011.

  1. hvactec
    Offline

    hvactec VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,315
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +132
    Here’s another reason for the rest of us to get mad at Wall Street. Even where the government can prove massive fraud in the mortgage market, the finance folks are saying the suits should be dropped.

    The suits were announced last Friday by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. FHFA sued 17 major banks and a number of individuals for fraud in the issuance and sale of mortgage backed securities during the buildup of the housing bubble.

    In response, a columnist for the Motley Fool has called the suits a “misguided search for vengeance” and “an unnecessary distraction.” An investment banker told Bloomberg that the government should “stop punishing banks.” The mortgage fraudsters should get away, they say, because we don’t want to shake confidence in the big banks that FHFA says committed massive mortgage fraud.

    But there are so many reasons why the people who perpetrate fraud should pay for it. To pick two often voiced by conservatives, take “personal responsibility” and “property rights.”

    The personal responsibility part is that individuals and companies that signed fraudulent securities filings are responsible for the fraud. That punishes fraud, and deters the next generation of Wall Street financiers when they get tempted to do it again.

    read more Wall Street Bankers Whine That They Shouldn
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    32,689
    Thanks Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +14,061
    So, the obvious solution is to make sure the banks only loan to those people who meet stringent financial requirements.....oh wait, the government called that racist.

    Proving fraud is very difficult, and the government may not like what happens during the discoveries the banks will perform.

    ALOT of people hands will be caught in the cookie jar, not just the banks you seem to have an obsession about.

    Also HV, how about posting an original thought for once?
     
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,792
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,810
    good ALL guilty partys should be caught and punished.
     
  4. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    85,192
    Thanks Received:
    15,614
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +42,866
    It's ironic how "Wall Street" does trillions of dollars of business in every conceivable line of business but the one that tanked was the one where the Federal Government set the underwriting standards and was the largest lender

    Must be a coinkydink
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2011
  5. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    32,689
    Thanks Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +14,061
    At what point do you see deliberate fraud being perfomed? Optimistic stupidity is not criminal.

    Everyone was making money on this, from people working as real estate brokers to the government making more in tax income, with the banks, the brokers and the homeowners in between.
     

Share This Page