Wall for strong gun control

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Brain357, Jan 12, 2019.

  1. Rigby5
    Offline

    Rigby5 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    792
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Ratings:
    +381

    Yes we did ask the Europeans to take in Mideast refugees for us, and they are doing us a favor because otherwise they would be trying to come to the US instead.
    When you attack and occupy a county, like we did in Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc., you become legally responsible for refugees you created, under international law.

    Pearl Harbor was essentially a terrorist attack. The only reason there were not more is that the US was so distant and hard to get to.
    It is cheaper to get to the US these days, so now you will get more terrorist attacks if you cause harm like war.
     
  2. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    45,360
    Thanks Received:
    5,740
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +23,945
    Yes we did ask the Europeans to take in Mideast refugees for us,

    Who asked? Obama and Hillary after they fucked up Libya?

    In that case the Europeans were idiots (especially Merkel) for accepting millions of low-skilled, hostile "refugees".

    and they are doing us a favor because otherwise they would be trying to come to the US instead.

    They should definitely try to bring their crappy boats to the US. The ones who make it should be refused and sent back.

    When you attack and occupy a county, like we did in Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc., you become legally responsible for refugees you created, under international law.

    Link?

    It is cheaper to get to the US these days, so now you will get more terrorist attacks if you cause harm like war.

    Sounds like an excellent reason to eliminate travel from Muslim countries.
     
  3. toobfreak
    Offline

    toobfreak Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    11,891
    Thanks Received:
    2,215
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +14,177
    You actually make a little sense and say a few factual things, then veer off into the realm of the mentally challenged. So . . . what has anything you say have to do with gun control and are you for or against it, or do you just babble ALL the time?

    All true! Police are human beings too and so subject to emotions and mistakes. As such, if a bad cop is going to shoot me for an unjust reason, if the police are going to leave me defenseless at a mass shooting while they go have a smoke waiting for SWAT, I choose to reserve the righht to at least be able to try to protect and defend myself rather than be 100% at their mercy. Guns 1 You 0.

    Guns were historically created to win wars first, then to control a population. The first step in every case is always to disarm that population first. So again, I choose to keep firearms rather than be without them. As to the "supposed big deal," you seem to overlook that the entire Revolutionary War that beat England and gave us the United States was fought because of an armed and well-trained militia. Not to mention in WWII when the Emperor of Japan was going to invade mainland USA and his generals talked him out of it because they knew we would be there armed, behind every single tree, rock and bush. If the Right To Carry is never needed again beyond those two incident to defend our mainland against threats foreign and domestic, I'LL TAKE IT. Guns 2 You 0.

    The very fact that I just proved they keep us free on both a personal and collective level makes your whole thought here beneath refutation. Guns 3 You 0.

    Gibberish.

    Maybe a point there. So what are you doing about it beside bitch? Are you going to give up freedom for security too, and get neither? I choose to exercise my right to self-protection because justice is not perfect and the police cannot be everywhere all the time. If half the people in this country grew a spine and defended their Constitution and demanded real representation, maybe we wouldn't have half this stuff going on you whine about. Guns 4 You 0.
     
  4. ThunderKiss1965
    Offline

    ThunderKiss1965 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    7,083
    Thanks Received:
    1,277
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    GNO
    Ratings:
    +6,555
    The ultimate law of the land says no. I believe house Democrats should immediately call for a vote on changing the 2nd Amendment. The spectacular failure would be hilarious.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. eagle1462010
    Offline

    eagle1462010 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2013
    Messages:
    35,162
    Thanks Received:
    7,257
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +25,584
    NO
     
  6. toobfreak
    Offline

    toobfreak Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    11,891
    Thanks Received:
    2,215
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +14,177
    No, idiot jackasses like you will do the rest. Concentrated wealth and power? How can you NOT have concentrations of wealth and power? Concentrations of wealth are called a national treasury for the dispensation of services to the nation (borders, highways, disasters, etc.) and concentrations of power are called a government (national administration for the sake of managing ports, borders, highways and disasters, not to mention armies and other things for the management of the country on the world stage).

    So, HB Blowme, what you are saying is that you are simply against any government at all? No treasury, no national defense? In other words, you are just another fucking scum anarchist who doesn't realize that all anarchy and socialism ever do is break down eventually into communism and centralized power anyway of a small oligarchy of the few who have ALL the money and power, and where the people have ZERO money, power or rights. At least our way, we have a republic governed by laws which give the people SOME power.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. H B Lowrie
    Offline

    H B Lowrie Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2018
    Messages:
    1,963
    Thanks Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Ratings:
    +844

    See what I mean?
     
  8. Polishprince
    Online

    Polishprince Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2016
    Messages:
    4,378
    Thanks Received:
    677
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +4,310

    Where did you get this idea? Mexico has extreme Gun Control, and a sky high homicide compared to America. Indeed, the Mexico's rate is more than thrice that of America.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. toobfreak
    Offline

    toobfreak Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    11,891
    Thanks Received:
    2,215
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +14,177

    Yes I do. For a while when you first joined I wasn't sure if you were conservative or liberal. Now I realize you are simply too brain-dead to justify a waste of my time.
     
  10. ThisIsMe
    Offline

    ThisIsMe Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2017
    Messages:
    773
    Thanks Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +446
    Amazing isn't it? Our government knows about every aspect of our lives, where we go, what we buy and what we say, but they cant find 11 million illegals.

    Astounding.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2

Share This Page