Walker thought about using troublemakers...

[Ravi]

he decided against doing it, and I suppose we can believe him since he thought he was talking to an ally.

But what is up with that? He shouldn't have even thought about it or discussed doing it...

Very anti-Democracy, imo.

What do you think?

 

[Avatar4321]

So having your own operatives speaking out within a protest is anti Democracy but legislators running away from the state is somehow pro Democracy?

 

[Annie]

he decided against doing it, and I suppose we can believe him since he thought he was talking to an ally.

But what is up with that? He shouldn't have even thought about it or discussed doing it...

Very anti-Democracy, imo.

What do you think?

 

[Ravi]

So having your own operatives speaking out within a protest is anti Democracy but legislators running away from the state is somehow pro Democracy?

I had a feeling, if you posted, that you'd rationalize it away.

Thanks for living up to my expectations.

Anyone want to take a serious stab?

 

[Madeline]

Gotta join Annie here, Ravi...this needs a linkiepoodle.

 

[Annie]

Gotta join Annie here, Ravi...this needs a linkiepoodle.

Yeah, otherwise we have to guess what she thought he meant about what he thought...

 

[Leweman]

I don't thing its good to think about it but he also DIDNT do it so its a moot point. Plants arent a new idea anyway. Its done by both sides all the time.

 

[Madeline]

So having your own operatives speaking out within a protest is anti Democracy but legislators running away from the state is somehow pro Democracy?

I had a feeling, if you posted, that you'd rationalize it away.

Thanks for living up to my expectations.

Anyone want to take a serious stab?

Did Walker consider having soldiers fire into crowds of demonstrators, a la Gadhafi? Did he consider asking a few line staffers who support him to eavesdrop on union meetings? Did he consider taking all the toilet paper out of public restrooms in the statehouse?

Can you see why a linkipoodle is needed, Ravi? Who can respond to an adjective like "troublemaker"?

 

[WillowTree]

he decided against doing it, and I suppose we can believe him since he thought he was talking to an ally.

But what is up with that? He shouldn't have even thought about it or discussed doing it...

Very anti-Democracy, imo.

What do you think?

What are troublemakers? And, what are the unions from other states doing in Wisconsin other than troublmaking.. so Walker thought about it and the dems done it.. is that right?? why yes myrtle, it is.

 

[Annie]

I don't thing its good to think about it but he also DIDNT do it so its a moot point. Plants arent a new idea anyway. Its done by both sides all the time.

I haven't a clue to what Ravi is referring to, but your post brings to mind Jimmy Carter and lusting in his heart.

 

[Madeline]

he decided against doing it, and I suppose we can believe him since he thought he was talking to an ally.

But what is up with that? He shouldn't have even thought about it or discussed doing it...

Very anti-Democracy, imo.

What do you think?

What are troublemakers? And, what are the unions from other states doing in Wisconsin other than troublmaking.. so Walker thought about it and the dems done it.. is that right?? why yes myrtle, it is.

It has sinister connotations, Willow. In the bad old days, the cops/private security would move on striking workers and kill a few, beat a few half to death, etc. I dunno what happened, but it has a creep factor, no doubt.

 

[WillowTree]

I don't thing its good to think about it but he also DIDNT do it so its a moot point. Plants arent a new idea anyway. Its done by both sides all the time.

I haven't a clue to what Ravi is referring to, but your post brings to mind Jimmy Carter and lusting in his heart.

I can't imagine that old peice of milque toast lusting can you?

 

[Avatar4321]

So having your own operatives speaking out within a protest is anti Democracy but legislators running away from the state is somehow pro Democracy?

I had a feeling, if you posted, that you'd rationalize it away.

Thanks for living up to my expectations.

Anyone want to take a serious stab?

Hardly rationalizing. After all, he didn't do anything so there is nothing to rationalize. Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean it wasnt answered.

 

[Madeline]

I don't thing its good to think about it but he also DIDNT do it so its a moot point. Plants arent a new idea anyway. Its done by both sides all the time.

I haven't a clue to what Ravi is referring to, but your post brings to mind Jimmy Carter and lusting in his heart.

I can't imagine that old peice of milque toast lusting can you?

Liberals fuck like bunnies. Yes, all true.

Like bunnies.....green with envy yet?

 

[Trajan]

he decided against doing it, and I suppose we can believe him since he thought he was talking to an ally.

But what is up with that? He shouldn't have even thought about it or discussed doing it...

Very anti-Democracy, imo.

What do you think?

what is a "troublemaker"....who, what...

 

[The Infidel]

he decided against doing it, and I suppose we can believe him since he thought he was talking to an ally.

But what is up with that? He shouldn't have even thought about it or discussed doing it...

Very anti-Democracy, imo.

What do you think?

Its all a crock o shiat!

 

[Defiant1]

I can't wait to be a troublemaker in Florida next month.

 

[Ravi]

Gotta join Annie here, Ravi...this needs a linkiepoodle.

Yeah, otherwise we have to guess what she thought he meant about what he thought...

Do you two pay attention to the news at all?

 

[Ravi]

well...this thread went as well as expected.

I can only conclude that Republicans in general will rationalize anything...as long as it is their side.

 

[Avorysuds]

So having your own operatives speaking out within a protest is anti Democracy but legislators running away from the state is somehow pro Democracy?

I had a feeling, if you posted, that you'd rationalize it away.

Thanks for living up to my expectations.

Anyone want to take a serious stab?

Yes, I will. In the end he didn't, and when you consider how "important" all of this is that says a lot as to what it might take for him to.

So, here is my prediction... People attack him for what he didn't do, then try and rationalize their attack with he *could have* sent out people... As if the Union and Dems are not doin that very same thing, right now.

So this is a "Thanks for living up to my expectations" in the future posts or posts I didn't read before mine.