W. Bank MPs slam PA for not protecting their rights

[Wolverine1984]

So now you blame the British ...
It's always somebody else, and the Palestinians are saints...
Thats the problem with the Palestinian approach in general ...
Pointing fingers on who did them wrong and then complain about it , without ever thinking about how or why did they get into the situation in the first place.

Palestinians want to go back to the 67 borders , but they had a chance to have their own state, 67 borders ,Jerusalem as capitol back in 1948 ... But what did they do ? Cried about how the Jews screwed them over and how the British screwed them over and choose to fight the Jews instead ,and got nothing as a result...

Their attitude is that screwed them over ... in the past and in the present ...

The truth is that if it were not for the British there would be no Israel. It is not a matter of blame. It is a statement of fact.

Why did they get into the situation in the first place? Good question. Some blame the Palestinians for their situation, but what did they do? What should they have done? What would you have done?

The roots of the conflict are quite simple. However there is a lot of smoke covering the basics.

The truth is that if it were not for the British there would be no Israel, and there would be no Palestine , but you conveniently forget to mention this fact ...
The idea of Palestine as a country for Palestinians only emeraged in the time of the British ...Only during the British mandate the idea of a Palestinian state was considered.

"What should they have done?"

Well agreeing to the partition plan and living peacefully with the Jews would be the wise choice.
They would have had the state that they wanted and non of the problems that they have now ...
However they chose to fight , and got nothing ...

The roots of the conflict are quite simple. However there is a lot of smoke covering the basics.

No doubt about it ... and you are doing your share in adding to that smoke ...

 

[P F Tinmore]

So now you blame the British ...
It's always somebody else, and the Palestinians are saints...
Thats the problem with the Palestinian approach in general ...
Pointing fingers on who did them wrong and then complain about it , without ever thinking about how or why did they get into the situation in the first place.

Palestinians want to go back to the 67 borders , but they had a chance to have their own state, 67 borders ,Jerusalem as capitol back in 1948 ... But what did they do ? Cried about how the Jews screwed them over and how the British screwed them over and choose to fight the Jews instead ,and got nothing as a result...

Their attitude is that screwed them over ... in the past and in the present ...

The truth is that if it were not for the British there would be no Israel. It is not a matter of blame. It is a statement of fact.

Why did they get into the situation in the first place? Good question. Some blame the Palestinians for their situation, but what did they do? What should they have done? What would you have done?

The roots of the conflict are quite simple. However there is a lot of smoke covering the basics.

The truth is that if it were not for the British there would be no Israel, and there would be no Palestine , but you conveniently forget to mention this fact ...
The idea of Palestine as a country for Palestinians only emeraged in the time of the British ...Only during the British mandate the idea of a Palestinian state was considered.

"What should they have done?"

Well agreeing to the partition plan and living peacefully with the Jews would be the wise choice.
They would have had the state that they wanted and non of the problems that they have now ...
However they chose to fight , and got nothing ...

The roots of the conflict are quite simple. However there is a lot of smoke covering the basics.

No doubt about it ... and you are doing your share in adding to that smoke ...

Well agreeing to the partition plan...

Would you have done that. If the UN came to the US and proposed giving everything east of the Mississippi to foreigners what do you think the response would be?

Yet you think the Palestinians are the bad guys for rejecting such a plan.

 

[Wolverine1984]

The truth is that if it were not for the British there would be no Israel. It is not a matter of blame. It is a statement of fact.

Why did they get into the situation in the first place? Good question. Some blame the Palestinians for their situation, but what did they do? What should they have done? What would you have done?

The roots of the conflict are quite simple. However there is a lot of smoke covering the basics.

The truth is that if it were not for the British there would be no Israel, and there would be no Palestine , but you conveniently forget to mention this fact ...
The idea of Palestine as a country for Palestinians only emeraged in the time of the British ...Only during the British mandate the idea of a Palestinian state was considered.

Well agreeing to the partition plan and living peacefully with the Jews would be the wise choice.
They would have had the state that they wanted and non of the problems that they have now ...
However they chose to fight , and got nothing ...


No doubt about it ... and you are doing your share in adding to that smoke ...

Well agreeing to the partition plan...

Would you have done that. If the UN came to the US and proposed giving everything east of the Mississippi to foreigners what do you think the response would be?

Yet you think the Palestinians are the bad guys for rejecting such a plan.

The US is a country ... Palestine is not and never was, nor Jews were foreigners ...

But I'll go with your metaphor ...

It's the same thing as the UN offering half of the US territory to the Indians, and the Indians would say no... we want the whole thing , and then trying to remove the US by force.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The truth is that if it were not for the British there would be no Israel, and there would be no Palestine , but you conveniently forget to mention this fact ...
The idea of Palestine as a country for Palestinians only emeraged in the time of the British ...Only during the British mandate the idea of a Palestinian state was considered.

Well agreeing to the partition plan and living peacefully with the Jews would be the wise choice.
They would have had the state that they wanted and non of the problems that they have now ...
However they chose to fight , and got nothing ...


No doubt about it ... and you are doing your share in adding to that smoke ...

Well agreeing to the partition plan...

Would you have done that. If the UN came to the US and proposed giving everything east of the Mississippi to foreigners what do you think the response would be?

Yet you think the Palestinians are the bad guys for rejecting such a plan.

The US is a country ... Palestine is not and never was, nor Jews were foreigners ...

But I'll go with your metaphor ...

It's the same thing as the UN offering half of the US territory to the Indians, and the Indians would say no... we want the whole thing , and then trying to remove the US by force.

You have that backwards but you are like that.