Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Federal Court finds Obama appointees interfered with New Black Panther prosecution | WashingtonExaminer.com
Uh oh....man the Justice Departmen is awesome, if we have more guys like Holder, we'd be Cuba!!!!!!!!!
Federal Court finds Obama appointees interfered with New Black Panther prosecution | WashingtonExaminer.com
Uh oh....man the Justice Departmen is awesome, if we have more guys like Holder, we'd be Cuba!!!!!!!!!
Obamas DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorneys fees since none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a series of emails between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:
The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJs dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perezs testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
In sum, the Court concludes that three of the four fee entitlement factors weigh in favor of awarding fees to Judicial Watch. Therefore, Judicial Watch is both eligible and entitled to fees and costs, and the Court must now consider the reasonableness of Judicial Watchs requested award.
Obamas DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorneys fees since none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a series of emails between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:
The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJs dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perezs testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
In sum, the Court concludes that three of the four fee entitlement factors weigh in favor of awarding fees to Judicial Watch. Therefore, Judicial Watch is both eligible and entitled to fees and costs, and the Court must now consider the reasonableness of Judicial Watchs requested award.
Accusations of the judge's racism in 5....
4....
3...
2....
1....
Let's hear it, Obamabots!!
