Voter ID and Race

Racism because people want our Election Laws to be followed, and don't want fraudulent votes being cast by illegal Aliens

Are illegal aliens swinging elections?


, and dead people.

Can you explain to me how Voter ID prevents a dead person from ending up on the voter registration list?

Illegals quite possibly could be swinging elections.

So you have no evidence they are. None exists. Anywhere.

[Voter ID prevents a live person from masquerading as a dead person as a means to cast a fraudulent vote. If you don't support voter ID requirements then you must be in favor of election FRAUD.

Horrible illogic, commonly referred to as a false dilemna. But I am not surprised. It is very common fallacy expressed by supporters of Voter ID.

If there is a dead person on the voter registration roll, that is not because we lack Voter ID. It is because the current government oversight we have has failed to remove them from the rolls. And yet here you are, demanding MORE government bureaucracy!

Better to clean up the existing system we have. No Voter ID necessary. Voter ID is a "solution" looking for a problem.

There is no case of fraud which only Voter ID can solve or prevent. None. I can't believe people like you want bigger government and more impediments to the exercising of our constitutional rights!
 
many dont own cars

That's because all the cheap cars were disposed of in Obama's "cash for clunkers" program... How discriminatory of Obama to enact such a program designed solely to hurt the poor people's ability to purchase a car that they could afford.

just making up fucking lies doesnt count as adult conversation

Please point out my lie. Everything I said was the end result of the "cash for clunkers" program. The days of the 5 hundred dollar car ended, thus so did the pool of affordable cars for poor people.
 
Are illegal aliens swinging elections?




Can you explain to me how Voter ID prevents a dead person from ending up on the voter registration list?

Illegals quite possibly could be swinging elections.

So you have no evidence they are. None exists. Anywhere.

[Voter ID prevents a live person from masquerading as a dead person as a means to cast a fraudulent vote. If you don't support voter ID requirements then you must be in favor of election FRAUD.

Horrible illogic, commonly referred to as a false dilemna. But I am not surprised. It is very common fallacy expressed by supporters of Voter ID.

If there is a dead person on the voter registration roll, that is not because we lack Voter ID. It is because the current government oversight we have has failed to remove them from the rolls. And yet here you are, demanding MORE government bureaucracy!

Better to clean up the existing system we have. No Voter ID necessary. Voter ID is a "solution" looking for a problem.

There is no case of fraud which only Voter ID can solve or prevent. None. I can't believe people like you want bigger government and more impediments to the exercising of our constitutional rights!

Do you honestly believe an election worker checking an ID is added bureaucracy?:lol: We have to produce valid ID cards throughout all walks of our lives already, and you know this. Upsetting to know that all those fraudulent Democrat votes are getting purged as we speak.:eusa_boohoo:
 
Racism because people want our Election Laws to be followed, and don't want fraudulent votes being cast by illegal Aliens

Are illegal aliens swinging elections?


, and dead people.

Can you explain to me how Voter ID prevents a dead person from ending up on the voter registration list?

Yes, they are, in counties/states with high illegal populations some estimates put the number of illegal voters above 10%. There is no enforcement of current laws and registration is ridiculously easy. The chances of getting caught are almost nil.
 
List of U.S. cities with most households without a car - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. New York City, New York 55.7%
2. Newark, New Jersey 44.17%
3. Jersey City, New Jersey 40.67%
4. Washington, D.C. 36.93%
5. Hartford, Connecticut 36.14%
6. Baltimore, Maryland 35.89%
7. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 35.74%
8. Boston, Massachusetts 34.91%
9. Buffalo, New York 31.42%
10. New Haven, Connecticut 29.74%
11. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 29.45%
12. Paterson, New Jersey 29.32%
13. Chicago, Illinois 28.85%
14. San Francisco, California 28.56%
15. Cambridge, Massachusetts 27.72%
16. New Orleans, Louisiana 27.32%
17. Yonkers, New York 27.05%
18. Miami, Florida 26.71%
19. Syracuse, New York 26.56%
20. Rochester, New York 25.32%
21. Elizabeth, New Jersey 25.21%
22. St. Louis, Missouri 25.17%
23. Cleveland, Ohio 24.57%
24. Bridgeport, Connecticut 23.77%
25. Atlanta, Georgia 23.58%
26. Cincinnati, Ohio 23.37%
27. Providence, Rhode Island 22.92%
28. Springfield, Massachusetts 22.52%
29. Detroit, Michigan 21.9%
30. Richmond, Virginia 21.63%
31. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 21.36%
32. East Los Angeles, California 21.24%
33. Louisville, Kentucky 20.47%
34. Dayton, Ohio 19.97%
35. Minneapolis, Minnesota 19.7%
36. Oakland, California 19.62%
37. Waterbury, Connecticut 19.46%
38. Gary, Indiana 19.37
39. Honolulu, Hawaii 19.36%
40. Allentown, Pennsylvania 18.84%
41. Erie, Pennsylvania 18.2%
42. Worcester, Massachusetts 18.11%
43. Savannah, Georgia 17.64%
44. Lowell, Massachusetts 17.05%
45. Berkeley, California 17.01%
46. Norfolk, Virginia 17.01%
47. St. Paul, Minnesota 16.83%
48. Birmingham, Alabama 16.77%
49. Los Angeles, California 16.53%
50. Seattle, Washington 16.32%

Interesting the amount of pro Democrat cities find themselves at the top of the list.:lol:
 
That's because all the cheap cars were disposed of in Obama's "cash for clunkers" program... How discriminatory of Obama to enact such a program designed solely to hurt the poor people's ability to purchase a car that they could afford.

just making up fucking lies doesnt count as adult conversation

Please point out my lie. Everything I said was the end result of the "cash for clunkers" program. The days of the 5 hundred dollar car ended, thus so did the pool of affordable cars for poor people.

poor people who cant afford cars dont buy huge old SUV that gas guzzle.

they dont buy cars becasue they cant afford them
 
List of U.S. cities with most households without a car - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. New York City, New York 55.7%
2. Newark, New Jersey 44.17%
3. Jersey City, New Jersey 40.67%
4. Washington, D.C. 36.93%
5. Hartford, Connecticut 36.14%
6. Baltimore, Maryland 35.89%
7. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 35.74%
8. Boston, Massachusetts 34.91%
9. Buffalo, New York 31.42%
10. New Haven, Connecticut 29.74%
11. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 29.45%
12. Paterson, New Jersey 29.32%
13. Chicago, Illinois 28.85%
14. San Francisco, California 28.56%
15. Cambridge, Massachusetts 27.72%
16. New Orleans, Louisiana 27.32%
17. Yonkers, New York 27.05%
18. Miami, Florida 26.71%
19. Syracuse, New York 26.56%
20. Rochester, New York 25.32%
21. Elizabeth, New Jersey 25.21%
22. St. Louis, Missouri 25.17%
23. Cleveland, Ohio 24.57%
24. Bridgeport, Connecticut 23.77%
25. Atlanta, Georgia 23.58%
26. Cincinnati, Ohio 23.37%
27. Providence, Rhode Island 22.92%
28. Springfield, Massachusetts 22.52%
29. Detroit, Michigan 21.9%
30. Richmond, Virginia 21.63%
31. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 21.36%
32. East Los Angeles, California 21.24%
33. Louisville, Kentucky 20.47%
34. Dayton, Ohio 19.97%
35. Minneapolis, Minnesota 19.7%
36. Oakland, California 19.62%
37. Waterbury, Connecticut 19.46%
38. Gary, Indiana 19.37
39. Honolulu, Hawaii 19.36%
40. Allentown, Pennsylvania 18.84%
41. Erie, Pennsylvania 18.2%
42. Worcester, Massachusetts 18.11%
43. Savannah, Georgia 17.64%
44. Lowell, Massachusetts 17.05%
45. Berkeley, California 17.01%
46. Norfolk, Virginia 17.01%
47. St. Paul, Minnesota 16.83%
48. Birmingham, Alabama 16.77%
49. Los Angeles, California 16.53%
50. Seattle, Washington 16.32%

Interesting the amount of pro Democrat cities find themselves at the top of the list.:lol:

ever drive a car in NYC
 
TM, I know what you THINK your OP proves, I just don't think you're smart enough to realize that it proves the OPPOSITE of what you think.

FAIL.jpg
 
just making up fucking lies doesnt count as adult conversation

Please point out my lie. Everything I said was the end result of the "cash for clunkers" program. The days of the 5 hundred dollar car ended, thus so did the pool of affordable cars for poor people.

poor people who cant afford cars dont buy huge old SUV that gas guzzle.

they dont buy cars becasue they cant afford them

You lost me on the first sentence. As for the second... Exactly my point. AGAIN: Obama made sure with the "cash for clunkers" program there would be no cheap cars around to supply the poor with affordable transportation... Those cars they could afford have been scrapped because of Obama's income discriminatory program.
 
List of U.S. cities with most households without a car - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. New York City, New York 55.7%
2. Newark, New Jersey 44.17%
3. Jersey City, New Jersey 40.67%
4. Washington, D.C. 36.93%
5. Hartford, Connecticut 36.14%
6. Baltimore, Maryland 35.89%
7. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 35.74%
8. Boston, Massachusetts 34.91%
9. Buffalo, New York 31.42%
10. New Haven, Connecticut 29.74%
11. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 29.45%
12. Paterson, New Jersey 29.32%
13. Chicago, Illinois 28.85%
14. San Francisco, California 28.56%
15. Cambridge, Massachusetts 27.72%
16. New Orleans, Louisiana 27.32%
17. Yonkers, New York 27.05%
18. Miami, Florida 26.71%
19. Syracuse, New York 26.56%
20. Rochester, New York 25.32%
21. Elizabeth, New Jersey 25.21%
22. St. Louis, Missouri 25.17%
23. Cleveland, Ohio 24.57%
24. Bridgeport, Connecticut 23.77%
25. Atlanta, Georgia 23.58%
26. Cincinnati, Ohio 23.37%
27. Providence, Rhode Island 22.92%
28. Springfield, Massachusetts 22.52%
29. Detroit, Michigan 21.9%
30. Richmond, Virginia 21.63%
31. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 21.36%
32. East Los Angeles, California 21.24%
33. Louisville, Kentucky 20.47%
34. Dayton, Ohio 19.97%
35. Minneapolis, Minnesota 19.7%
36. Oakland, California 19.62%
37. Waterbury, Connecticut 19.46%
38. Gary, Indiana 19.37
39. Honolulu, Hawaii 19.36%
40. Allentown, Pennsylvania 18.84%
41. Erie, Pennsylvania 18.2%
42. Worcester, Massachusetts 18.11%
43. Savannah, Georgia 17.64%
44. Lowell, Massachusetts 17.05%
45. Berkeley, California 17.01%
46. Norfolk, Virginia 17.01%
47. St. Paul, Minnesota 16.83%
48. Birmingham, Alabama 16.77%
49. Los Angeles, California 16.53%
50. Seattle, Washington 16.32%

Interesting the amount of pro Democrat cities find themselves at the top of the list.:lol:

ever drive a car in NYC

Yes, soooo?
 
many residents dont drive any car.

why are you pretending they do?
 
Please point out my lie. Everything I said was the end result of the "cash for clunkers" program. The days of the 5 hundred dollar car ended, thus so did the pool of affordable cars for poor people.

poor people who cant afford cars dont buy huge old SUV that gas guzzle.

they dont buy cars becasue they cant afford them

You lost me on the first sentence. As for the second... Exactly my point. AGAIN: Obama made sure with the "cash for clunkers" program there would be no cheap cars around to supply the poor with affordable transportation... Those cars they could afford have been scrapped because of Obama's income discriminatory program.

so for some fucking reason you think the SUVs in cash for clunkers would have been given away free if they were not crushed?
 
List of U.S. cities with most households without a car - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. New York City, New York 55.7%
2. Newark, New Jersey 44.17%
3. Jersey City, New Jersey 40.67%
4. Washington, D.C. 36.93%
5. Hartford, Connecticut 36.14%
6. Baltimore, Maryland 35.89%
7. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 35.74%
8. Boston, Massachusetts 34.91%
9. Buffalo, New York 31.42%
10. New Haven, Connecticut 29.74%
11. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 29.45%
12. Paterson, New Jersey 29.32%
13. Chicago, Illinois 28.85%
14. San Francisco, California 28.56%
15. Cambridge, Massachusetts 27.72%
16. New Orleans, Louisiana 27.32%
17. Yonkers, New York 27.05%
18. Miami, Florida 26.71%
19. Syracuse, New York 26.56%
20. Rochester, New York 25.32%
21. Elizabeth, New Jersey 25.21%
22. St. Louis, Missouri 25.17%
23. Cleveland, Ohio 24.57%
24. Bridgeport, Connecticut 23.77%
25. Atlanta, Georgia 23.58%
26. Cincinnati, Ohio 23.37%
27. Providence, Rhode Island 22.92%
28. Springfield, Massachusetts 22.52%
29. Detroit, Michigan 21.9%
30. Richmond, Virginia 21.63%
31. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 21.36%
32. East Los Angeles, California 21.24%
33. Louisville, Kentucky 20.47%
34. Dayton, Ohio 19.97%
35. Minneapolis, Minnesota 19.7%
36. Oakland, California 19.62%
37. Waterbury, Connecticut 19.46%
38. Gary, Indiana 19.37
39. Honolulu, Hawaii 19.36%
40. Allentown, Pennsylvania 18.84%
41. Erie, Pennsylvania 18.2%
42. Worcester, Massachusetts 18.11%
43. Savannah, Georgia 17.64%
44. Lowell, Massachusetts 17.05%
45. Berkeley, California 17.01%
46. Norfolk, Virginia 17.01%
47. St. Paul, Minnesota 16.83%
48. Birmingham, Alabama 16.77%
49. Los Angeles, California 16.53%
50. Seattle, Washington 16.32%

Interesting the amount of pro Democrat cities find themselves at the top of the list.:lol:

That doesn't mean they don't have an ID.
 
why is it the people on the right lie so fucking much?

does racism make you want to lie?
 

Forum List

Back
Top