[VIDEO] ~ Horrific reality of the "WAR ON DRUGS" exposed in SWAT raid video tape...

Sorry this was totally uncalled for. Why use a swat team? Why could a black and white not taken care of this? They shot a dog whom was protecting the house with a blatant over use of force. I would had been very very pissed and may have swung at the swat team. I mean looking at the home and family why would a swat team been used? surveilance perhaps and arrest the perp when his family is gone or something, totaly uncalled for and those officers and the person in charge of approving that should be looking for a job. I just can't believe they shot the dog and used a whole swat team. that was uncalled for. as for the war on drugs comment of the OP, not sure I see the reasoning of that, it was a blatant over use of force, abuse of power and trigger happy officers. Remind me not to speed in missouri hell I would really hate to see what they do to traffic violators.

It is obvious that we do not know what the warrant was for. Nor do we know for certain what was found or not found, we only have an Anonymous persons word for it. if all they found was an ounce or less of grass, and had no reason other than that small quantity then they would be wrong. But if they had good reason for a judge to sign a warrant for the guy maybe selling a few pounds......

Fact is we just do not know for what reason they were there. if you take the video without all the facts it was over use of force. But there is a whole set of facts that goes with the video that we do not have.

yes that is true and is why I asked the questions in the beginning. seriously though I think surveillance could had been used to clear some of those facts up. Maybe they did we do not know at this time. But looking at it right now it does give the impression of an overuse of force, I just replied on my first emotion watching the video. I would like to know those unknown issues though, still shooting a dog in its home was wrong, imo.
 
Sorry this was totally uncalled for. Why use a swat team? Why could a black and white not taken care of this? They shot a dog whom was protecting the house with a blatant over use of force. I would had been very very pissed and may have swung at the swat team. I mean looking at the home and family why would a swat team been used? surveilance perhaps and arrest the perp when his family is gone or something, totaly uncalled for and those officers and the person in charge of approving that should be looking for a job. I just can't believe they shot the dog and used a whole swat team. that was uncalled for. as for the war on drugs comment of the OP, not sure I see the reasoning of that, it was a blatant over use of force, abuse of power and trigger happy officers. Remind me not to speed in missouri hell I would really hate to see what they do to traffic violators.

It is obvious that we do not know what the warrant was for. Nor do we know for certain what was found or not found, we only have an Anonymous persons word for it. if all they found was an ounce or less of grass, and had no reason other than that small quantity then they would be wrong. But if they had good reason for a judge to sign a warrant for the guy maybe selling a few pounds......

Fact is we just do not know for what reason they were there. if you take the video without all the facts it was over use of force. But there is a whole set of facts that goes with the video that we do not have.

yes that is true and is why I asked the questions in the beginning. seriously though I think surveillance could had been used to clear some of those facts up. Maybe they did we do not know at this time. But looking at it right now it does give the impression of an overuse of force, I just replied on my first emotion watching the video. I would like to know those unknown issues though, still shooting a dog in its home was wrong, imo.



the war on pot is wrong.

period.

American jackbooted gestapo thugs should NOT be waging war on people who smoke pot.

REAL freedom means that we all get to decide for ourselves whether we are going to drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, play football, sky dive, eat at mcdonalds or smoke pot.

waging war (killing people and destroying their lives) simply for buying/selling or smoking marijuana is SICK!

laws should be based upon logic and reason and NOT LIES and IRRATIONAL FEARS
 
STOOOOOOOPID FUCKING CRETIN OLLIE BY GOLLY: "Dumb ass fucking druggies."

:rolleyes:

...lol!...when you stooooopid motherfucking 'drug warriors' first enacted marijuana prohibition in ?1937 hardly anyone had even heard of pot..never mind tried it..

...now nearly 75 years later, after tremendous grief and trea$ure spent, you stoooooooooooopid motherfucking conservative republiclowns can't even come up with a presidential candidate not photographed sucking on a bong at college!..(another failed big government program brought to you by the stinking 'fiscally conservative' :rolleyes: teabagger crowd) :rolleyes:

...yet you fucking miserable drug warrior republicrats keep rolling on with your monstrously stoooooooooooooooopid 'drug war'..

...as an aside, i've never met a one of you chicken-shit drug warrior assholes who would dare to confront someone using pot on their property...but that doesn't stop you cowardly pieces of shit from unleashing the drug pigs to do your dirty work for you!.. ;)

..stfu, drug warrior assholes..

..the rest of you, have a nice night!..
 
In the spirit of keeping this discussion calm and civil, I propose that we all enjoy some cannabis to calm our nerves. ;)
 
Fuck that. Violating a law that shouldn't exist in the first place doesn't give pigs the right to terrorize children and tear families apart.

"Fuck that. Violating a law that shouldn't exist in the first place doesn't give pigs the right to terrorize children and tear families apart."


and if sfc ollie thinks killing people and terrorizing children over pot is the right thing for government thugs to do then we need a tea party movement to oppose ANTI-FREEDOM, MURDEROUS scum like sfc ollie

When did I say that any of it was the right thing to do? I said that doing drugs is the wrong thing to do. And I said that cops are not pigs. I also said they were human and make mistakes. Are you so fucking perfect? Shove your scum up your ass.
Some cops are pigs. And deserve to be chastised.
 
There has never been a war on drugs. What we have seen for the last 40 years is a war on people and the US Constitution.
A total failure where regularlaw enforcement, not the narc squads, are against the continued waste of time and resources of the fraud known as "the war on drugs".
Drugs are A FRIGGIN HEALTH PROBLEM, not a crime problem. Youmake it a crime problem with prohibition.
Politicians are the dumbasses. We are a nation addicted to prescription dope, they advertise it on TV and it is legal. Criminalize Gramps getting his Viagra or Missy getting her Prozac and we would have mass riots.
Anyone that is for the 'war on drugs"is a complete fool and should not be allowed to vote.
 
Sorry this was totally uncalled for. Why use a swat team? Why could a black and white not taken care of this? They shot a dog whom was protecting the house with a blatant over use of force. I would had been very very pissed and may have swung at the swat team. I mean looking at the home and family why would a swat team been used? surveilance perhaps and arrest the perp when his family is gone or something, totaly uncalled for and those officers and the person in charge of approving that should be looking for a job. I just can't believe they shot the dog and used a whole swat team. that was uncalled for. as for the war on drugs comment of the OP, not sure I see the reasoning of that, it was a blatant over use of force, abuse of power and trigger happy officers. Remind me not to speed in missouri hell I would really hate to see what they do to traffic violators.

It is obvious that we do not know what the warrant was for. Nor do we know for certain what was found or not found, we only have an Anonymous persons word for it. if all they found was an ounce or less of grass, and had no reason other than that small quantity then they would be wrong. But if they had good reason for a judge to sign a warrant for the guy maybe selling a few pounds......

Fact is we just do not know for what reason they were there. if you take the video without all the facts it was over use of force. But there is a whole set of facts that goes with the video that we do not have.


We know exactly why it was executed. It was because two snitches claimed he had a lot of weed. It was such a fuxxed up raid the Chief of police is pretending they are changing how raids are conducted. I say "pretending" because when a police department publicly acknowledges they fuxxed up it is because they can't justify what happened but they also generally don't give a fuck so they say what PR tactics demand and keep doing whatever the hell they want. After all, who can call the cops on the cops?

Http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/may/06/chief-details-swat-incident/
 
STOOOOOOOPID FUCKING CRETIN OLLIE BY GOLLY: "Dumb ass fucking druggies."

:rolleyes:

...lol!...when you stooooopid motherfucking 'drug warriors' first enacted marijuana prohibition in ?1937 hardly anyone had even heard of pot..never mind tried it..

...now nearly 75 years later, after tremendous grief and trea$ure spent, you stoooooooooooopid motherfucking conservative republiclowns can't even come up with a presidential candidate not photographed sucking on a bong at college!..(another failed big government program brought to you by the stinking 'fiscally conservative' :rolleyes: teabagger crowd) :rolleyes:

...yet you fucking miserable drug warrior republicrats keep rolling on with your monstrously stoooooooooooooooopid 'drug war'..

...as an aside, i've never met a one of you chicken-shit drug warrior assholes who would dare to confront someone using pot on their property...but that doesn't stop you cowardly pieces of shit from unleashing the drug pigs to do your dirty work for you!.. ;)

..stfu, drug warrior assholes..

..the rest of you, have a nice night!..

The truth is that 2 of my brothers and one of my sisters use marijuana on a regular basis. They have enough respect that I don't need to tell them not at my house. And if it were a stranger I would hold them while the Mrs called the Police.
 
STOOOOOOOPID FUCKING CRETIN OLLIE BY GOLLY: "Dumb ass fucking druggies."

:rolleyes:

...lol!...when you stooooopid motherfucking 'drug warriors' first enacted marijuana prohibition in ?1937 hardly anyone had even heard of pot..never mind tried it..

...now nearly 75 years later, after tremendous grief and trea$ure spent, you stoooooooooooopid motherfucking conservative republiclowns can't even come up with a presidential candidate not photographed sucking on a bong at college!..(another failed big government program brought to you by the stinking 'fiscally conservative' :rolleyes: teabagger crowd) :rolleyes:

...yet you fucking miserable drug warrior republicrats keep rolling on with your monstrously stoooooooooooooooopid 'drug war'..

...as an aside, i've never met a one of you chicken-shit drug warrior assholes who would dare to confront someone using pot on their property...but that doesn't stop you cowardly pieces of shit from unleashing the drug pigs to do your dirty work for you!.. ;)

..stfu, drug warrior assholes..

..the rest of you, have a nice night!..

The truth is that 2 of my brothers and one of my sisters use marijuana on a regular basis. They have enough respect that I don't need to tell them not at my house. And if it were a stranger I would hold them while the Mrs called the Police.

On your property you have that right. Why not just run them off? Why press charges and add $30K to the deficit for someone smoking weed?
 
Sorry this was totally uncalled for. Why use a swat team? Why could a black and white not taken care of this? They shot a dog whom was protecting the house with a blatant over use of force. I would had been very very pissed and may have swung at the swat team. I mean looking at the home and family why would a swat team been used? surveilance perhaps and arrest the perp when his family is gone or something, totaly uncalled for and those officers and the person in charge of approving that should be looking for a job. I just can't believe they shot the dog and used a whole swat team. that was uncalled for. as for the war on drugs comment of the OP, not sure I see the reasoning of that, it was a blatant over use of force, abuse of power and trigger happy officers. Remind me not to speed in missouri hell I would really hate to see what they do to traffic violators.

It is obvious that we do not know what the warrant was for. Nor do we know for certain what was found or not found, we only have an Anonymous persons word for it. if all they found was an ounce or less of grass, and had no reason other than that small quantity then they would be wrong. But if they had good reason for a judge to sign a warrant for the guy maybe selling a few pounds......

Fact is we just do not know for what reason they were there. if you take the video without all the facts it was over use of force. But there is a whole set of facts that goes with the video that we do not have.


We know exactly why it was executed. It was because two snitches claimed he had a lot of weed. It was such a fuxxed up raid the Chief of police is pretending they are changing how raids are conducted. I say "pretending" because when a police department publicly acknowledges they fuxxed up it is because they can't justify what happened but they also generally don't give a fuck so they say what PR tactics demand and keep doing whatever the hell they want. After all, who can call the cops on the cops?

Http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/may/06/chief-details-swat-incident/

Very good Curvelight, I will agree that the police should not have executed an 8 day old warrant, they should have acted immediately or not at all.
 
STOOOOOOOPID FUCKING CRETIN OLLIE BY GOLLY: "Dumb ass fucking druggies."

:rolleyes:

...lol!...when you stooooopid motherfucking 'drug warriors' first enacted marijuana prohibition in ?1937 hardly anyone had even heard of pot..never mind tried it..

...now nearly 75 years later, after tremendous grief and trea$ure spent, you stoooooooooooopid motherfucking conservative republiclowns can't even come up with a presidential candidate not photographed sucking on a bong at college!..(another failed big government program brought to you by the stinking 'fiscally conservative' :rolleyes: teabagger crowd) :rolleyes:

...yet you fucking miserable drug warrior republicrats keep rolling on with your monstrously stoooooooooooooooopid 'drug war'..

...as an aside, i've never met a one of you chicken-shit drug warrior assholes who would dare to confront someone using pot on their property...but that doesn't stop you cowardly pieces of shit from unleashing the drug pigs to do your dirty work for you!.. ;)

..stfu, drug warrior assholes..

..the rest of you, have a nice night!..

The truth is that 2 of my brothers and one of my sisters use marijuana on a regular basis. They have enough respect that I don't need to tell them not at my house. And if it were a stranger I would hold them while the Mrs called the Police.

So it's not that you are against drug use. You just want to be able to say whom can or cannot use them.
 
It is obvious that we do not know what the warrant was for. Nor do we know for certain what was found or not found, we only have an Anonymous persons word for it. if all they found was an ounce or less of grass, and had no reason other than that small quantity then they would be wrong. But if they had good reason for a judge to sign a warrant for the guy maybe selling a few pounds......

Fact is we just do not know for what reason they were there. if you take the video without all the facts it was over use of force. But there is a whole set of facts that goes with the video that we do not have.


We know exactly why it was executed. It was because two snitches claimed he had a lot of weed. It was such a fuxxed up raid the Chief of police is pretending they are changing how raids are conducted. I say "pretending" because when a police department publicly acknowledges they fuxxed up it is because they can't justify what happened but they also generally don't give a fuck so they say what PR tactics demand and keep doing whatever the hell they want. After all, who can call the cops on the cops?

Http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/may/06/chief-details-swat-incident/

Very good Curvelight, I will agree that the police should not have executed an 8 day old warrant, they should have acted immediately or not at all.


Holy shit! I'm shocked! Thanks for your response to the info. The most disturbing part I read is SWAT will execute warrants based more on convenience of the officers' schedules versus the purposes of the warrants themselves.
 
STOOOOOOOPID FUCKING CRETIN OLLIE BY GOLLY: "Dumb ass fucking druggies."

:rolleyes:

...lol!...when you stooooopid motherfucking 'drug warriors' first enacted marijuana prohibition in ?1937 hardly anyone had even heard of pot..never mind tried it..

...now nearly 75 years later, after tremendous grief and trea$ure spent, you stoooooooooooopid motherfucking conservative republiclowns can't even come up with a presidential candidate not photographed sucking on a bong at college!..(another failed big government program brought to you by the stinking 'fiscally conservative' :rolleyes: teabagger crowd) :rolleyes:

...yet you fucking miserable drug warrior republicrats keep rolling on with your monstrously stoooooooooooooooopid 'drug war'..

...as an aside, i've never met a one of you chicken-shit drug warrior assholes who would dare to confront someone using pot on their property...but that doesn't stop you cowardly pieces of shit from unleashing the drug pigs to do your dirty work for you!.. ;)

..stfu, drug warrior assholes..

..the rest of you, have a nice night!..

The truth is that 2 of my brothers and one of my sisters use marijuana on a regular basis. They have enough respect that I don't need to tell them not at my house. And if it were a stranger I would hold them while the Mrs called the Police.

So it's not that you are against drug use. You just want to be able to say whom can or cannot use them.

No, I am still very much so against drug use. But family is family, and like I said they have enough respect not to bring it here. Or at least keep it hidden.
 
Fuck you asshole, they decided to fuck around with an "Unloaded" M16 And one of them took 20 rounds through the chest at less than 6 inches. Had they not been totally fucked up that night in the guardshack one would still be alive and the other wouldn't be doing 25 to life. You think I make this shit up? Yes marijuana has and can kill. Now do you fucking understand why I might just be against it?

And for the rest of you dickweeds, please continue to be losers, I could give a fuck. You have the right to remain silent, you have the right to an attorney, etc......

Dumb ass fucking druggies.



oh so this is a GUN ISSUE rather than a POT ISSUE, eh you bearded pansy motherfucker? Yea, that's kinda what I FIGURED it would turn out to be, cock ranger. You can blame whatever you want for that death but the bottom line is that the POT wasn't the mitigating factor at play. How about if your friend wasn't playing around with a fucking WEAPON like a douchebag? Pot no more killed that man then the choice of underwear he made that morning. but, of course, dimwitted motherfuckers like you need a scape goat instead of laying the blame at the very person choosing to shoot another motherfucker.


:rolleyes:

seriously, you are not bright at all. Go end your worthless life you fucking geriatric scab.

You stupid fuck, they were on guard duty getting fucked up. If they had not been under the influence ........Fuck it you can't see through your drug infused brain, go shoot something up.

"getting fucked up" implies that it doesn't matter WHAT the chemical was that they chose when THEY chose to act like dangerous douche bags. Hell, they could have been DRINKING and it still would not have been ALCOHOL that caused them to play around with GUNS, you stupid fucking ass master.


tell me more about shooting things, you mellow-dramatic pussy, as you leave out the most pertinent information of your giant boohoo fest.

:rofl:


:thup:
 
You know, for every situation we can find a few incidents that seem to make the right wrong and the wrong right. So how many thousands of Guilty Pushers have been caught in drug raids? Or is it hundreds of thousands?

So your answer is 'so what'... my answer is 'fuck you, you slimy little scum bag'

There is ONE and only ONE drug a human being can die just from it's withdrawal. There is ONE and only ONE drug that kills more human beings than any other. There is ONE and only ONE drug that leads to rape. There is ONE and only ONE drug that causes more property damage, higher insurance premiums and destroys more lives than any other...

ALCOHOL...

You are a mindless fucking pawn of the state...you don't own a brain, the government does...

Never said that the Drug itself causes death though many have died of various overdoses. Or do we tend to forget people like Hendrix, Joplin , and Morrison (and his wife). And god knows how many others. I am against drugs based upon my own life experiences, so go ahead and call this old retired Sergeant (former hippie type) all the names you like.
Fuck you very much, and have a great day.


none of your examples died of a marijuana overdose, you stupid fucking, crusty bearded liar. If your life experiences are culminated in your bullshit guard story then it's no wonder why you are stupid enough to believe that pot kills.
 
Sorry this was totally uncalled for. Why use a swat team? Why could a black and white not taken care of this? They shot a dog whom was protecting the house with a blatant over use of force. I would had been very very pissed and may have swung at the swat team. I mean looking at the home and family why would a swat team been used? surveilance perhaps and arrest the perp when his family is gone or something, totaly uncalled for and those officers and the person in charge of approving that should be looking for a job. I just can't believe they shot the dog and used a whole swat team. that was uncalled for. as for the war on drugs comment of the OP, not sure I see the reasoning of that, it was a blatant over use of force, abuse of power and trigger happy officers. Remind me not to speed in missouri hell I would really hate to see what they do to traffic violators.

It is obvious that we do not know what the warrant was for. Nor do we know for certain what was found or not found, we only have an Anonymous persons word for it. if all they found was an ounce or less of grass, and had no reason other than that small quantity then they would be wrong. But if they had good reason for a judge to sign a warrant for the guy maybe selling a few pounds......

Fact is we just do not know for what reason they were there. if you take the video without all the facts it was over use of force. But there is a whole set of facts that goes with the video that we do not have.

READ THE ARTICLE YOU DIPSHIT!

:rofl:

We DO know what the fucking warrant was for: possession of quantities of weed to be distributed. We DO know what was actually found: less than a gram of weed, a grinder and a pipe, and the video WAS FROM THE FUCKING SWAT TEAM, you goddamn invalid.

Fact is, you just responded like a reflexive dip shit and clearly didn't even read the fucking link of the OP given that THIS info was all available yesterday as soon as the story broke.

WOW you are a fucking mess.
 
Simple solution there too. Stay the hell out of my way. You still have the right to remain silent.

izzat an order sargeANt? i'm not one to stoop to the vulgar childishness when it comes to flaming idiots in forums like this but, 1)i outrank you considerably and 2) urine over yer head on this one top old boy and if you need a thrashing on this or any other thread you will get it.

promise.

(do usn nbc hazmath can travel ring a familiar bell? suit me up, ollie!)

Sergeant First Class to you, Top would be a Fist Sergeant. And no one out ranks me these days except the Mrs. The best thing about being retired. And if you were navy as you hint thank you for your service, now grow up. Or are you telling me you are a sock puppet for someone else?

never signed a contract with any of the services as they became after the coup of 1963.
enlisted twice in the navy; the first time with only a high school diploma they couldn't promise OCS and i didn't really want to be riding up and down the mekong river with a big cross on my helmet for gooks to shoot at so i declined their offer and went to college. after graduation they couldn't offer me what i wanted and i wouldn't accept their offer.

men and women in my family served in non-combatant professional billets in all the great wars of the 20th century. my generation declined to participate in dirty bush wars commencing with viet nam and opted into civilian service instead.

i worked for the city of chicago and the state of texas prior to blacklisting in the reagan-bushwhacking 80's and have been on the front lines of the great secret civil war ever since as a journalist and performance artist. i've survived half a dozen assassination attempts including a contract shooter with a silenced .22. if our legal government is ever reconstituted and my reserve contract is activated i will be called into service at a grade of at least O-4.

if i may remind you of the topic of this thread, specifically the legitimacy or lack thereof of the war on drugs, this is not about personal feelings but the facts that either support or declaim the validity of the drug war.

my position is firmly that the problem is essentially attributable to the parameters of a black market rather than the substances themselves. legalize, regulate, tax, enforce a fair market and the collateral crime will disappear as well as a reduction in price and an increase in quality.

marijuana in particular has been a part of human society throughout recorded history. until the prohibition in 1937, various cannabis preparations were prescribed for more ailments than any other substance in the pharmacopaiea. as a recreational drug, it is shared in community bonding rituals more than just "getting blasted".

for myself, it has helped me not to kill people who were trying very hard to get me to do just that. it helps me eat when i can't eat and sleep when i can't sleep. i have shared many wonderful experiences in public smoking circles all over the country since 1966 and formed many lasting friendships from them.
 
The truth is that 2 of my brothers and one of my sisters use marijuana on a regular basis. They have enough respect that I don't need to tell them not at my house. And if it were a stranger I would hold them while the Mrs called the Police.

So it's not that you are against drug use. You just want to be able to say whom can or cannot use them.

No, I am still very much so against drug use. But family is family, and like I said they have enough respect not to bring it here. Or at least keep it hidden.


So why not show the same compassion for strangers?
 
STOOOOOOOPID FUCKING CRETIN OLLIE BY GOLLY: "Dumb ass fucking druggies."

:rolleyes:

...lol!...when you stooooopid motherfucking 'drug warriors' first enacted marijuana prohibition in ?1937 hardly anyone had even heard of pot..never mind tried it..

...now nearly 75 years later, after tremendous grief and trea$ure spent, you stoooooooooooopid motherfucking conservative republiclowns can't even come up with a presidential candidate not photographed sucking on a bong at college!..(another failed big government program brought to you by the stinking 'fiscally conservative' :rolleyes: teabagger crowd) :rolleyes:

...yet you fucking miserable drug warrior republicrats keep rolling on with your monstrously stoooooooooooooooopid 'drug war'..

...as an aside, i've never met a one of you chicken-shit drug warrior assholes who would dare to confront someone using pot on their property...but that doesn't stop you cowardly pieces of shit from unleashing the drug pigs to do your dirty work for you!.. ;)

..stfu, drug warrior assholes..

..the rest of you, have a nice night!..

The truth is that 2 of my brothers and one of my sisters use marijuana on a regular basis. They have enough respect that I don't need to tell them not at my house. And if it were a stranger I would hold them while the Mrs called the Police.


of course you would

you are a mindlessly obedient nazi facist

how would you "hold them"?
by force?
with a gun?

if they tried to get away would you shoot them?
shoot them dead?

and then say "another drug related death!"?

you sicken me

you are the worst kind of American

you believe in freedom for yourself but NOT for others

List of United States politicians who admit to cannabis use - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Abraham Lincoln admitted in a letter written during his presidency that one of his "favorite things" was "sitting on [his] front porch smoking a pipe of sweet hemp".

--------------------

Prior to prohibition, U.S. politicians known for growing cannabis include some of the nation's Founding Fathers and Presidents.

This is an incomplete list, which may never be able to satisfy certain standards for completion. You can help by expanding it with reliably sourced additions.

Former President of the United States Thomas JeffersonName Lifetime Highest position Party Ref.

Franklin, BenjaminBenjamin Franklin 1706–1790 1706–1790 President of the Supreme Executive Council of Pennsylvania Independent [6]

Jackson, AndrewAndrew Jackson 1767–1845 1767–1845 President of the United States Democratic [7]

Jefferson, ThomasThomas Jefferson 1743–1826 1743–1826 President of the United States Democratic-Republican [8]

Lincoln, AbrahamAbraham Lincoln 1809–1865 1809–1865 President of the United States Republican [4]

Madison, JamesJames Madison 1751–1836 1751–1836 President of the United States Democratic-Republican [2]

Monroe, JamesJames Monroe 1758–1831 1758–1831 President of the United States Democratic-Republican [7]

Pierce, FranklinFranklin Pierce 1804–1869 1804–1869 President of the United States Democratic [7]

Taylor, ZacharyZachary Taylor 1784–1799 1784–1850 President of the United States Whig [7]

Washington, GeorgeGeorge Washington 1732–1799 1732–1799 President of the United States Independent


===================

post prohibition (those who have ADMITTED to smoking pot)


Bruce Babbitt 1938 b. 1938 Secretary of the Interior Democratic [14]
Michael Bloomberg 1942 b. 1942 Mayor of New York City Independent [15]
Bill Bradley 1943 b. 1943 Senator from New Jersey Democratic [16]
Paul Cellucci 1948 b. 1948 Governor of Massachusetts Republican [17]
Lincoln Chafee 1953 b. 1953 Senator from Rhode Island Republican [18]
Lawton Chiles 1930–1998 1930–1998 Senator from Florida Democratic [19]
Bill Clinton 1946 b. 1946 President of the United States Democratic [20]
Steve Cohen 1949 b. 1949 Member of the House of Representatives Democratic [21]
Andrew Cuomo 1957 b. 1957 New York State Attorney General Democratic [22]
Howard Dean 1948 b. 1948 Chairman of the Democratic National Committee Democratic [23]
Joseph DeNucci 1939 b. 1939 Massachusetts Auditor Democratic [17]
Mary Donohue b. ? Lieutenant Governor of New York Republican [24]
John Edwards 1953 b. 1953 Senator from North Carolina Democratic [23]
Newt Gingrich 1943 b. 1943 Speaker of the House of Representatives Republican [14]
Al Gore 1948 b. 1948 Vice President of the United States Democratic [25]
Gary E. Johnson 1953 b. 1953 Governor of New Mexico Republican [26]
Joseph Patrick Kennedy II 1952 b. 1952 Member of the House of Representatives Democratic [17]
John Kerry 1943 b. 1943 Senator from Massachusetts Democratic [23]
Ed Koch 1924 b. 1924 Member of the House of Representatives Democratic [27]
Connie Mack III 1940 b. 1940 Senator from Florida Republican [19]
Kyle E. McSlarrow b. 1960 Deputy Secretary of the Department of Energy Republican [28]
John Miller 1938 b. 1938 Member of the House of Representatives Republican [29]
Susan Molinari 1958 b. 1958 Member of the House of Representatives Republican [30]
Jim Moran 1945 b. 1945 Member of the House of Representatives Democratic [28]
Evelyn Murphy 1940 b. 1940 Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts Democratic [17]
Richard Neal 1949 b. 1949 Member of the House of Representatives Democratic [17]
Barack Obama 1961 b. 1961 President of the United States Democratic [31]
Sarah Palin 1964 b. 1964 Governor of Alaska Republican [32]
George Pataki 1945 b. 1945 Governor of New York Republican [22]
David Paterson 1954 b. 1954 Governor of New York Democratic [33]
Edward W. Pattison 1932 1932–1990 Member of the House of Representatives Democratic [34]
Claiborne Pell 1918–2009 1918–2009 Senator from Rhode Island Democratic [14]
Arnold Schwarzenegger 1947 b. 1947 Governor of California Republican [35]
William Scranton 1917 b. 1917 Ambassador to the United Nations Republican [36]
Bill Thompson 1953 b. 1953 New York City Comptroller Democratic [37]
Peter G. Torkildsen 1958 b. 1958 Member of the House of Representatives Republican [17]
Jesse Ventura 1951 b. 1951 Governor of Minnesota
 
STOOOOOOOPID FUCKING CRETIN OLLIE BY GOLLY: "Dumb ass fucking druggies."

:rolleyes:

...lol!...when you stooooopid motherfucking 'drug warriors' first enacted marijuana prohibition in ?1937 hardly anyone had even heard of pot..never mind tried it..

...now nearly 75 years later, after tremendous grief and trea$ure spent, you stoooooooooooopid motherfucking conservative republiclowns can't even come up with a presidential candidate not photographed sucking on a bong at college!..(another failed big government program brought to you by the stinking 'fiscally conservative' :rolleyes: teabagger crowd) :rolleyes:

...yet you fucking miserable drug warrior republicrats keep rolling on with your monstrously stoooooooooooooooopid 'drug war'..

...as an aside, i've never met a one of you chicken-shit drug warrior assholes who would dare to confront someone using pot on their property...but that doesn't stop you cowardly pieces of shit from unleashing the drug pigs to do your dirty work for you!.. ;)

..stfu, drug warrior assholes..

..the rest of you, have a nice night!..

The truth is that 2 of my brothers and one of my sisters use marijuana on a regular basis. They have enough respect that I don't need to tell them not at my house. And if it were a stranger I would hold them while the Mrs called the Police.

Well Ollie, you just proved you are a scurrilous scum bag. I you truly believe marijuana is a substance that requires arrest and incarceration, AND you had character and ethics, you'd hold your brothers and sister, the CALL THE POLICE.
 

Forum List

Back
Top