Victim du jour

[Intense]

So now you guys do think political speach should NOT contain any phrases that could be mistaken as violent?

You really need to do something about your selective memory.

 

[Sky Dancer]

So now you guys do think political speach should NOT contain any phrases that could be mistaken as violent?

I think we all ought to watch our speech more carefully.

 

[rightwinger]

As opposed to your remedies, Limp Dick? The Second Amendment remedy does work effectively against Rioting, Looting, and Violent Attack.

Tea Baggers never talked about second amendment remedies in response to Rioting, Looting or Violent Attack

So this conversation is illusory? You are beyond Retarded. What do you think the Primary focus of the Second Amendment is about? Hunting, or Self Defense? What does Self Defense incorporate?

Neither

A well regulated militia, being Necessary to the security of a free state....

Never mentions self defense or hunting

 

[manifold]

Tea Baggers never talked about second amendment remedies in response to Rioting, Looting or Violent Attack

So this conversation is illusory? You are beyond Retarded. What do you think the Primary focus of the Second Amendment is about? Hunting, or Self Defense? What does Self Defense incorporate?

Neither

A well regulated militia, being Necessary to the security of a free state....

Never mentions self defense or hunting

Neg'd for being intentionally obtuse.

I know you're smart enough to make the connection between security and defense.

 

[Intense]

Tea Baggers never talked about second amendment remedies in response to Rioting, Looting or Violent Attack

So this conversation is illusory? You are beyond Retarded. What do you think the Primary focus of the Second Amendment is about? Hunting, or Self Defense? What does Self Defense incorporate?

Neither

A well regulated militia, being Necessary to the security of a free state....

Never mentions self defense or hunting

Self Defense is a Natural Right. The mistake in the Second Amendment was over estimating, Human Intelligence and taking the obvious for granted.

 

[NYcarbineer]

“Everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back & keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these son of a bitches out”

 

[rightwinger]

So this conversation is illusory? You are beyond Retarded. What do you think the Primary focus of the Second Amendment is about? Hunting, or Self Defense? What does Self Defense incorporate?

Neither

A well regulated militia, being Necessary to the security of a free state....

Never mentions self defense or hunting

Neg'd for being intentionally obtuse.

I know you're smart enough to make the connection between security and defense.

Sorry..

But there is a big difference between self defense and national defense

 

[Ravi]

“Everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back & keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these son of a bitches out”

Yep, that's the remark that made the Teapees pee their pants.

 

[manifold]

Neither

A well regulated militia, being Necessary to the security of a free state....

Never mentions self defense or hunting

Neg'd for being intentionally obtuse.

I know you're smart enough to make the connection between security and defense.

Sorry..

But there is a big difference between self defense and national defense

The only difference is one of scale.

Any other difference you imagine is just that, imagined.

 

[Ravi]

Neither

A well regulated militia, being Necessary to the security of a free state....

Never mentions self defense or hunting

Neg'd for being intentionally obtuse.

I know you're smart enough to make the connection between security and defense.

Sorry..

But there is a big difference between self defense and national defense

Aside from the varying interpretations of the second amendment, it does not allow anyone to shoot someone else because one believes the evil socialists are taking over.

If elections stop happening they might have a point.

 

[Sky Dancer]

See how the Tea Party fits into Leah Burton's premise in God, Guns and Greed.

 

[del]

I just watched those and people are doing nothing but talking except that one guy pushes a phone camera out of his face.

How does that compare with a bullet to the head?

try both and get back to us

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Right to Defend Ones Life against Brutality, Harm, Forfeit, is A Natural Right. Like we are supposed to raise our hands and ask for permission first, and wait for a reply from some Bureaucrat or Administrator sorta misses the point, don't you think?

The second amendment remedy quote was a reference to taking up arms against our government.

 

[rightwinger]

“Everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back & keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these son of a bitches out”

Yep, that's the remark that made the Teapees pee their pants.

Do Tea Baggers have a problem with voting?

 

[del]

Rightly or wrongly, I'm lumping you in with a great many hypocrites that are condemning Hoffa's remark here but defended Palin's cross-hairs and the 2nd Amendment remedies rhetoric. If I'm wrong to lump in with this group please let me know.

IMO, you can't condemn one and condone the other without being a hypocrite, and that goes for both sides.

True enough, even though I believe there is a difference in calling for "second amendment" solutions and voting people out of office.

When hoffa called for a WAR to TAKE US OUT it didn't sound like he was talking about the voting booth. It was a call for VIOLENCE to shut us up. The TEA PARTY has become the most powerful movement in the nation and it scares the hell out of the socialist( democrats, libs unions, progressives). They had their chance at running this country and it is a miserable failure and they are willing to resort to violence to remain in control. Won't work.

grow a pair, you whining limp dick

 

[NYcarbineer]

“Everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back & keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these son of a bitches out”

Yep, that's the remark that made the Teapees pee their pants.

Yes.

That he said take them out, instead of vote them out, is the source of their incontinence.

I object to the use of sons of bitches, to be honest, not to the meaning of the statement.

 

[Sallow]

“Everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back & keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these son of a bitches out”

Yep, that's the remark that made the Teapees pee their pants.

Do Tea Baggers have a problem with voting?

Most conservatives have a problem with voting.

They don't like it. No Sir. No one bit.

 

[Intense]

Neither

A well regulated militia, being Necessary to the security of a free state....

Never mentions self defense or hunting

Neg'd for being intentionally obtuse.

I know you're smart enough to make the connection between security and defense.

Sorry..

But there is a big difference between self defense and national defense

States Rights Issue.

VOLOKH - FORMAT 5/16/2007 2:56:03 PM
STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF SELF-DEFENSE
AND DEFENSE OF PROPERTY
EUGENE VOLOKH*
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 400
II. STATE CONSTITUTIONAL “RIGHT TO DEFEND LIFE”
PROVISIONS ..................................................................... 401
III. CASES INTERPRETING THE PROVISIONS........................... 407
A. The Property Defense Cases........................................... 407
B. Self-Defense in Criminal Cases ..................................... 409
C. Self-Defense/Defense of Property and Civil Liberty.......... 411
D. Self-Defense and Private Employer Actions .................... 411
E. Limitations ................................................................. 412
IV. THE RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE UNDER STATE
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO BEAR ARMS ...................... 414
V. IS THERE A FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO
SELF-DEFENSE.................................................................. 415
A. Leading Early Commentators ....................................... 416
B. Cases .......................................................................... 416
C. Second Amendment ..................................................... 418
VI. CONCLUSION................................................................... 418
* Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law, UCLA ([email protected]).

http://www.trolp.org/main_pgs/issues/v11n2/Volokh.pdf

 

[Intense]

Yep, that's the remark that made the Teapees pee their pants.

Do Tea Baggers have a problem with voting?

Most conservatives have a problem with voting.

They don't like it. No Sir. No one bit.

I like Voting.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[When hoffa called for a WAR to TAKE US OUT it didn't sound like he was talking about the voting booth.

Indeed!

How on earth would anyone hear

"Everybody here’s got to vote..."

and think he was talking about the voting booth???

Voting? Voting booth? The two aren't even REMOTELY similar...

retard.