Vanishing Glaciers Of The Greater Himalaya - Photographic evidence

[Toddsterpatriot]

OK. So you think that you have one on Thunder. But I see he is still on here. So it looks like this is just more of your bullshit.

Since anyone can look at the links for themselves and see that there is no hidden code, this comes down to just more off-topic distraction and misdirection. It is a common tactic of the denier cultists when they have no real response to the science and the facts. The slackjawedidiot is known for idiotic obsessions like this, usually involving his fantasy 'sock-puppets'.

Since anyone can look at the links for themselves and see that there is no hidden code,

I believe you. Except for the hidden code in your links.

When I view the source in post #1, I see this.

//api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence.html&v=1&libid=1318702937206&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld-south-asia-15216875&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence-6.html&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Rivers%20of%20ice%3A%20Vanishing%20glaciers&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13187030530291

I guess it got there on accident?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Here's some info on some studies done a few years ago that highlight the drastic changes occurring with glaciers in the high mountainous regions of the world.

Himalaya glaciers melting much faster
Warming appears to be having bigger impact on ice at higher elevations

By Michael Reilly
MSNBC.com
11/24/2008
(excerpts)

Glaciers high in the Himalayas are dwindling faster than anyone thought, putting nearly a billion people living in South Asia in peril of losing their water supply. Throughout India, China, and Nepal, some 15,000 glaciers speckle the Tibetan Plateau, some of the highest land in the world. There, perched in thin, frigid air up to 7,200 meters (23,622 feet) above sea level, the ice might seem secluded from the effects of global warming. But just the opposite is proving true, according to new research published last week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University and a team of researchers traveled to central Himalayas in 2006 to study the Naimona'nyi glacier, expecting to find some melting. Mountain glaciers have been receding all over the world since the 1990s and there was no reason this one, which provides water to the mighty Ganges, Indus, and Brahmaputra Rivers, should be any different. But when the team analyzed samples of glacier, what they found stunned them. Glaciers around the planet are usually dated by looking for two pulses of radioactivity buried in the ice. These are the leftovers from American and Russian atomic bomb testing in the 1950's and 1960's. In the Naimona'nyi samples, there was no sign of the tests. In fact, the glacier had melted so much that the exposed surface of the glacier dated to 1944.

He suspects the reason for this is that high-altitude glaciers, despite residing in colder temperatures, are more sensitive to climate change. As more heat is trapped in the atmosphere, he said, it holds more water vapor. And when the water vapor rises to high altitudes it condenses, releasing the heat into the upper atmosphere, where high mountain landscapes feel the brunt of warming. "At the highest elevations, we're seeing something like an average of 0.3 degrees Centigrade warming per decade," Thompson said. "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects 3 degrees of warming by 2100. But that's at the surface; up at the elevations where these glaciers are there could be almost twice as much, almost 6 degrees."

The finding has ominous implications for the hundreds of millions of people who depend on the waters of the Naimona'nyi and other glaciers for their livelihoods. Across the region, no one know just how much water the Himalayas have left, but Thompson said it's dwindling fast. "You can think of glaciers kind of like water towers, " he said. "They collect water from the monsoon in the wet season, and release it in the dry season. But how effective they are depends on how much water is in the towers."

© 2011 Discovery Channel

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

//api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence-6.html%23post4274254&v=1&libid=1318703137169&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F27894721%2Fns%2Fus_news-environment%2Ft%2Fhimalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster%2F%23.Tph31V2D2uI&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fnewreply.php%3Fdo%3Dpostreply%26t%3D189019&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20Page%206%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Himalaya%20glaciers%20melting%20much%20faster&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13187031384201

Nice!

 

[RollingThunder]

Here's some info on some studies done a few years ago that highlight the drastic changes occurring with glaciers in the high mountainous regions of the world.

Himalaya glaciers melting much faster
Warming appears to be having bigger impact on ice at higher elevations

By Michael Reilly
MSNBC.com
11/24/2008
(excerpts)

Glaciers high in the Himalayas are dwindling faster than anyone thought, putting nearly a billion people living in South Asia in peril of losing their water supply. Throughout India, China, and Nepal, some 15,000 glaciers speckle the Tibetan Plateau, some of the highest land in the world. There, perched in thin, frigid air up to 7,200 meters (23,622 feet) above sea level, the ice might seem secluded from the effects of global warming. But just the opposite is proving true, according to new research published last week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University and a team of researchers traveled to central Himalayas in 2006 to study the Naimona'nyi glacier, expecting to find some melting. Mountain glaciers have been receding all over the world since the 1990s and there was no reason this one, which provides water to the mighty Ganges, Indus, and Brahmaputra Rivers, should be any different. But when the team analyzed samples of glacier, what they found stunned them. Glaciers around the planet are usually dated by looking for two pulses of radioactivity buried in the ice. These are the leftovers from American and Russian atomic bomb testing in the 1950's and 1960's. In the Naimona'nyi samples, there was no sign of the tests. In fact, the glacier had melted so much that the exposed surface of the glacier dated to 1944.

He suspects the reason for this is that high-altitude glaciers, despite residing in colder temperatures, are more sensitive to climate change. As more heat is trapped in the atmosphere, he said, it holds more water vapor. And when the water vapor rises to high altitudes it condenses, releasing the heat into the upper atmosphere, where high mountain landscapes feel the brunt of warming. "At the highest elevations, we're seeing something like an average of 0.3 degrees Centigrade warming per decade," Thompson said. "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects 3 degrees of warming by 2100. But that's at the surface; up at the elevations where these glaciers are there could be almost twice as much, almost 6 degrees."

The finding has ominous implications for the hundreds of millions of people who depend on the waters of the Naimona'nyi and other glaciers for their livelihoods. Across the region, no one know just how much water the Himalayas have left, but Thompson said it's dwindling fast. "You can think of glaciers kind of like water towers, " he said. "They collect water from the monsoon in the wet season, and release it in the dry season. But how effective they are depends on how much water is in the towers."

© 2011 Discovery Channel

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

//api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence-6.html%23post4274254&v=1&libid=1318703137169&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F27894721%2Fns%2Fus_news-environment%2Ft%2Fhimalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster%2F%23.Tph31V2D2uI&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fnewreply.php%3Fdo%3Dpostreply%26t%3D189019&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20Page%206%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Himalaya%20glaciers%20melting%20much%20faster&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13187031384201

Nice!

Perhaps you could explain how you got that crap? When I right click on the link and hit 'copy link location', I get this: h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

Just how are you supposedly "viewing the source" as you claim?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Here's some info on some studies done a few years ago that highlight the drastic changes occurring with glaciers in the high mountainous regions of the world.

Himalaya glaciers melting much faster
Warming appears to be having bigger impact on ice at higher elevations

By Michael Reilly
MSNBC.com
11/24/2008
(excerpts)

Glaciers high in the Himalayas are dwindling faster than anyone thought, putting nearly a billion people living in South Asia in peril of losing their water supply. Throughout India, China, and Nepal, some 15,000 glaciers speckle the Tibetan Plateau, some of the highest land in the world. There, perched in thin, frigid air up to 7,200 meters (23,622 feet) above sea level, the ice might seem secluded from the effects of global warming. But just the opposite is proving true, according to new research published last week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University and a team of researchers traveled to central Himalayas in 2006 to study the Naimona'nyi glacier, expecting to find some melting. Mountain glaciers have been receding all over the world since the 1990s and there was no reason this one, which provides water to the mighty Ganges, Indus, and Brahmaputra Rivers, should be any different. But when the team analyzed samples of glacier, what they found stunned them. Glaciers around the planet are usually dated by looking for two pulses of radioactivity buried in the ice. These are the leftovers from American and Russian atomic bomb testing in the 1950's and 1960's. In the Naimona'nyi samples, there was no sign of the tests. In fact, the glacier had melted so much that the exposed surface of the glacier dated to 1944.

He suspects the reason for this is that high-altitude glaciers, despite residing in colder temperatures, are more sensitive to climate change. As more heat is trapped in the atmosphere, he said, it holds more water vapor. And when the water vapor rises to high altitudes it condenses, releasing the heat into the upper atmosphere, where high mountain landscapes feel the brunt of warming. "At the highest elevations, we're seeing something like an average of 0.3 degrees Centigrade warming per decade," Thompson said. "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects 3 degrees of warming by 2100. But that's at the surface; up at the elevations where these glaciers are there could be almost twice as much, almost 6 degrees."

The finding has ominous implications for the hundreds of millions of people who depend on the waters of the Naimona'nyi and other glaciers for their livelihoods. Across the region, no one know just how much water the Himalayas have left, but Thompson said it's dwindling fast. "You can think of glaciers kind of like water towers, " he said. "They collect water from the monsoon in the wet season, and release it in the dry season. But how effective they are depends on how much water is in the towers."

© 2011 Discovery Channel

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

//api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence-6.html%23post4274254&v=1&libid=1318703137169&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F27894721%2Fns%2Fus_news-environment%2Ft%2Fhimalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster%2F%23.Tph31V2D2uI&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fnewreply.php%3Fdo%3Dpostreply%26t%3D189019&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20Page%206%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Himalaya%20glaciers%20melting%20much%20faster&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13187031384201

Nice!

Perhaps you could explain how you got that crap? When I right click on the link and hit 'copy link location', I get this: h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

Just how are you supposedly "viewing the source" as you claim?

Right click then click "Properties"

 

[westwall]

Here's some info on some studies done a few years ago that highlight the drastic changes occurring with glaciers in the high mountainous regions of the world.

Himalaya glaciers melting much faster
Warming appears to be having bigger impact on ice at higher elevations

By Michael Reilly
MSNBC.com
11/24/2008
(excerpts)

Glaciers high in the Himalayas are dwindling faster than anyone thought, putting nearly a billion people living in South Asia in peril of losing their water supply. Throughout India, China, and Nepal, some 15,000 glaciers speckle the Tibetan Plateau, some of the highest land in the world. There, perched in thin, frigid air up to 7,200 meters (23,622 feet) above sea level, the ice might seem secluded from the effects of global warming. But just the opposite is proving true, according to new research published last week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University and a team of researchers traveled to central Himalayas in 2006 to study the Naimona'nyi glacier, expecting to find some melting. Mountain glaciers have been receding all over the world since the 1990s and there was no reason this one, which provides water to the mighty Ganges, Indus, and Brahmaputra Rivers, should be any different. But when the team analyzed samples of glacier, what they found stunned them. Glaciers around the planet are usually dated by looking for two pulses of radioactivity buried in the ice. These are the leftovers from American and Russian atomic bomb testing in the 1950's and 1960's. In the Naimona'nyi samples, there was no sign of the tests. In fact, the glacier had melted so much that the exposed surface of the glacier dated to 1944.

He suspects the reason for this is that high-altitude glaciers, despite residing in colder temperatures, are more sensitive to climate change. As more heat is trapped in the atmosphere, he said, it holds more water vapor. And when the water vapor rises to high altitudes it condenses, releasing the heat into the upper atmosphere, where high mountain landscapes feel the brunt of warming. "At the highest elevations, we're seeing something like an average of 0.3 degrees Centigrade warming per decade," Thompson said. "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects 3 degrees of warming by 2100. But that's at the surface; up at the elevations where these glaciers are there could be almost twice as much, almost 6 degrees."

The finding has ominous implications for the hundreds of millions of people who depend on the waters of the Naimona'nyi and other glaciers for their livelihoods. Across the region, no one know just how much water the Himalayas have left, but Thompson said it's dwindling fast. "You can think of glaciers kind of like water towers, " he said. "They collect water from the monsoon in the wet season, and release it in the dry season. But how effective they are depends on how much water is in the towers."

© 2011 Discovery Channel

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

//api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence-6.html%23post4274254&v=1&libid=1318703137169&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F27894721%2Fns%2Fus_news-environment%2Ft%2Fhimalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster%2F%23.Tph31V2D2uI&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fnewreply.php%3Fdo%3Dpostreply%26t%3D189019&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20Page%206%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Himalaya%20glaciers%20melting%20much%20faster&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13187031384201

Nice!

Perhaps you could explain how you got that crap? When I right click on the link and hit 'copy link location', I get this: h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

Just how are you supposedly "viewing the source" as you claim?

I don't know troll, you posted the link. I guess you're like every other little child and aren't responsible for your actions. What are you 5?

 

[RollingThunder]

//api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence-6.html%23post4274254&v=1&libid=1318703137169&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F27894721%2Fns%2Fus_news-environment%2Ft%2Fhimalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster%2F%23.Tph31V2D2uI&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fnewreply.php%3Fdo%3Dpostreply%26t%3D189019&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20Page%206%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Himalaya%20glaciers%20melting%20much%20faster&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13187031384201

Nice!

Perhaps you could explain how you got that crap? When I right click on the link and hit 'copy link location', I get this: h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

Just how are you supposedly "viewing the source" as you claim?

Right click then click "Properties"

Yeah, right, you lying troll, I did just that and this is what anyone can see if they do that:
h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

You deluded retards are pathetic.

 

[skookerasbil]

Here's some info on some studies done a few years ago that highlight the drastic changes occurring with glaciers in the high mountainous regions of the world.

Himalaya glaciers melting much faster
Warming appears to be having bigger impact on ice at higher elevations

By Michael Reilly
MSNBC.com
11/24/2008
(excerpts)

Glaciers high in the Himalayas are dwindling faster than anyone thought, putting nearly a billion people living in South Asia in peril of losing their water supply. Throughout India, China, and Nepal, some 15,000 glaciers speckle the Tibetan Plateau, some of the highest land in the world. There, perched in thin, frigid air up to 7,200 meters (23,622 feet) above sea level, the ice might seem secluded from the effects of global warming. But just the opposite is proving true, according to new research published last week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University and a team of researchers traveled to central Himalayas in 2006 to study the Naimona'nyi glacier, expecting to find some melting. Mountain glaciers have been receding all over the world since the 1990s and there was no reason this one, which provides water to the mighty Ganges, Indus, and Brahmaputra Rivers, should be any different. But when the team analyzed samples of glacier, what they found stunned them. Glaciers around the planet are usually dated by looking for two pulses of radioactivity buried in the ice. These are the leftovers from American and Russian atomic bomb testing in the 1950's and 1960's. In the Naimona'nyi samples, there was no sign of the tests. In fact, the glacier had melted so much that the exposed surface of the glacier dated to 1944.

He suspects the reason for this is that high-altitude glaciers, despite residing in colder temperatures, are more sensitive to climate change. As more heat is trapped in the atmosphere, he said, it holds more water vapor. And when the water vapor rises to high altitudes it condenses, releasing the heat into the upper atmosphere, where high mountain landscapes feel the brunt of warming. "At the highest elevations, we're seeing something like an average of 0.3 degrees Centigrade warming per decade," Thompson said. "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects 3 degrees of warming by 2100. But that's at the surface; up at the elevations where these glaciers are there could be almost twice as much, almost 6 degrees."

The finding has ominous implications for the hundreds of millions of people who depend on the waters of the Naimona'nyi and other glaciers for their livelihoods. Across the region, no one know just how much water the Himalayas have left, but Thompson said it's dwindling fast. "You can think of glaciers kind of like water towers, " he said. "They collect water from the monsoon in the wet season, and release it in the dry season. But how effective they are depends on how much water is in the towers."

© 2011 Discovery Channel

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

 

[westwall]

Perhaps you could explain how you got that crap? When I right click on the link and hit 'copy link location', I get this: h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

Just how are you supposedly "viewing the source" as you claim?

Right click then click "Properties"

Yeah, right, you lying troll, I did just that and this is what anyone can see if they do that:
h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

You deluded retards are pathetic.

Yes, yes we are, but what does that make you, who's losing your ass everytime you post here???? Oh yeah, that's right...an EVEN DUMBER 'TARD!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And that sums you up perfectly.

Post a single lie I've ever uttered then. I made the same challenge to olfraud over a year ago and the MENSA BOY hasn't been able to post one.

Dumb ass, you have been proven a liar repeatedly. Just one statement, "the last ten years has cooled". Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record. It cooled, but it's the warmest one on record? You are a liar.

Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record.

Everyone's record? Using real data? Or using the data faked by the warmists?

What did they mean by "hide the decline"?

 

[RollingThunder]

Right click then click "Properties"

Yeah, right, you lying troll, I did just that and this is what anyone can see if they do that:
h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

You deluded retards are pathetic.

Yes, yes we are

That's probably the most honest thing you've ever posted, walleyed. Congratulations.

but what does that make you, who's losing your ass everytime you post here???? Oh yeah, that's right...an EVEN DUMBER 'TARD!

Well of course you imagine you're winning but that is only because you're too retarded to know what the hell is going on. In reality, your nonsense and misinformation gets debunked every time but again, you don't have the brains to realize how much you're outclassed and wup-assed.

 

[Old Rocks]

Post a single lie I've ever uttered then. I made the same challenge to olfraud over a year ago and the MENSA BOY hasn't been able to post one.

Dumb ass, you have been proven a liar repeatedly. Just one statement, "the last ten years has cooled". Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record. It cooled, but it's the warmest one on record? You are a liar.

Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record.

Everyone's record? Using real data? Or using the data faked by the warmists?

What did they mean by "hide the decline"?

Well boy, post a link that proves the data is 'faked'. Or post a link to an accredited institution that states that the last decade was not the warmest on record.

'Hide the decline' has been explained many times. And all concerned were exonerated by the scientific community.

But go on blindly quoting 'talking points' and continue to demonstrate that you are an ignoramous.

Past Decade Warmest on Record, NASA Data Shows - NYTimes.com

NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries

NASA - NASA Research Finds Last Decade was Warmest on Record, 2009 One of Warmest Years

 

[westwall]

Yeah, right, you lying troll, I did just that and this is what anyone can see if they do that:
h ttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27894721/ns/us_news-environment/t/himalaya-glaciers-melting-much-faster/#.Tph31V2D2uI

You deluded retards are pathetic.

Yes, yes we are

That's probably the most honest thing you've ever posted, walleyed. Congratulations.

but what does that make you, who's losing your ass everytime you post here???? Oh yeah, that's right...an EVEN DUMBER 'TARD!

Well of course you imagine you're winning but that is only because you're too retarded to know what the hell is going on. In reality, your nonsense and misinformation gets debunked every time but again, you don't have the brains to realize how much you're outclassed and wup-assed.

No, I'm pretty sure the sceptics are kicking your asses all over the place. Everywhere except Australia (where the politicians who voted it in are heavily invested in the green enrgy to replace the evil fossil fuel industry) carbon taxes are dead. Everywhere, the sceptical argument is winning over converts...EVERY MINUTE OF EVERY DAY.

It's only brain dead cultists like you who don't see the writing on the wall. Mr. Piltdown Man.





Climate of green fear awaits us | Herald Sun

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dumb ass, you have been proven a liar repeatedly. Just one statement, "the last ten years has cooled". Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record. It cooled, but it's the warmest one on record? You are a liar.

Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record.

Everyone's record? Using real data? Or using the data faked by the warmists?

What did they mean by "hide the decline"?

Well boy, post a link that proves the data is 'faked'. Or post a link to an accredited institution that states that the last decade was not the warmest on record.

'Hide the decline' has been explained many times. And all concerned were exonerated by the scientific community.

But go on blindly quoting 'talking points' and continue to demonstrate that you are an ignoramous.

Past Decade Warmest on Record, NASA Data Shows - NYTimes.com

NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries

NASA - NASA Research Finds Last Decade was Warmest on Record, 2009 One of Warmest Years

The data wasn't faked? Massaged? Why all the excitement over the leaked e-mails?

Yeah, hide the decline was explained. LOL!

You had to hide the decline, to make it seem warmer now.

Great explanation.

 

[Sunshine]

The earth has been changing since it came into being. Continents have shifted. Ice ages have come and gone. We should be learning to adapt rather than trying to figure out how to stop the changes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dumb ass, you have been proven a liar repeatedly. Just one statement, "the last ten years has cooled". Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record. It cooled, but it's the warmest one on record? You are a liar.

Yet, by everyone's record, the last decade has been the warmest one on record.

Everyone's record? Using real data? Or using the data faked by the warmists?

What did they mean by "hide the decline"?

Well boy, post a link that proves the data is 'faked'. Or post a link to an accredited institution that states that the last decade was not the warmest on record.

'Hide the decline' has been explained many times. And all concerned were exonerated by the scientific community.

But go on blindly quoting 'talking points' and continue to demonstrate that you are an ignoramous.

Past Decade Warmest on Record, NASA Data Shows - NYTimes.com

NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries

NASA - NASA Research Finds Last Decade was Warmest on Record, 2009 One of Warmest Years

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAlMomLvu_4]Censoring The Decrease in Global Temperatures - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Old Rocks]

OK, Toddster, so you think a Youtube is equal to NASA and NOAA scientists. Oh well, what was one to expect.

 

[Old Rocks]

The earth has been changing since it came into being. Continents have shifted. Ice ages have come and gone. We should be learning to adapt rather than trying to figure out how to stop the changes.

Well, when we are causing the changes, perhaps it would be wise to cease and desist from those actions that are causing the changes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

OK, Toddster, so you think a Youtube is equal to NASA and NOAA scientists. Oh well, what was one to expect.

I haven't seen the YouTube guys committing fraud yet.

Like the Hockey Stick. Hide the Decline.

All the fraud shown by Climategate.

Quick, let's spend trillions and cripple our economy, based on fraud.

Great idea.

What was the "Nature Trick"?

 

[Sunshine]

The earth has been changing since it came into being. Continents have shifted. Ice ages have come and gone. We should be learning to adapt rather than trying to figure out how to stop the changes.

Well, when we are causing the changes, perhaps it would be wise to cease and desist from those actions that are causing the changes.

We, as in the US? Have you been to China. I have. I've been and I've seen. The Chinese pollute about as badly as the US. And you are powerless to stop it. You will not stop the Chinese from using their vast coal resources. They aren't going to be cold in the winter and shut down their factories so that your sensibilities will not be offended. The earth is changing. We cannot stop it. We need to learn how to adapt.


http://www.chinahush.com/2009/10/21/amazing-pictures-pollution-in-china/

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The earth has been changing since it came into being. Continents have shifted. Ice ages have come and gone. We should be learning to adapt rather than trying to figure out how to stop the changes.

Well, when we are causing the changes, perhaps it would be wise to cease and desist from those actions that are causing the changes.

Let's do a cost-benefit analysis first.