Van Jones a 911 truther

And the Party of Hate strikes again!

I'm still waiting for you people to come up with ONE helpful solution to all the crap your president left Obama with. Just ONE.

No, no, you're much too busy criticizing every little tiny minutae of the Obama administration to do something like make a positive influence.

Meanwhile, the economy is improving by leaps and bounds from the Depression state that you idiots left it in.

But who cares about that? Let's talk about "Van fucking Jones".

You people are pitiful.

AND YOU ARE SO ENDEARING! YES YOU ARE CUPCAKE! :lol::lol::lol: WE ARE SUPPOSED TO WORK WITH THE LIKES OF YOU CUPCAKE??? :lol::lol::lol:

Are you trying to come on to me? Sorry I don't swing that way.

As far as "working with the likes of me" is concerned, you people have said nothing but "NO!" since day 1 of the Obama administration. You never once tried to work with anyone. All you do is get in the way.

That's the G-No-P for you.

oh poor wittle whining weenie.. Guess what? we took careful notes of your lack of support for America for eight long years. The only time you are "for country" is when your asshole is in power.. well suck it up. We have a right to complain and complain we will. but we still laugh at yer alligator tears.. boo fucking hoo.
 
We're talking about the increasing unemployment rate in another thread. You are right, however, in that Obama's failed Stimulus is a far larger problem than this Van Jones embarrassment.


As any amatuer economist can tell you, Unemployment is historically, the last item to improve during a recovery.

Right now, housing numbers have improved, the banks are making a profit on the government's investment, production numbers are up, and sales of durable goods have improved. In addition, the stock market is way up from the time Obama was sworn in.

Ben Bernanke and all the other major economists are all in agreement that the recovery has begun and the the economy is on the upswing.
The global economy is recovering far faster than is the US, and many economists hold Obama responsible. Many fear that our over-reactions of the spring may cause a double-dip recession.

Finance & Development: September 2009 -- IMF

But what do you care about that? The job of the G-No-P is apparently to keep up as much criticism for as long as possible to keep people scared of that "liberal, black president".

You're a pitiful bunch of losers who failed horribly in your job when you were in the majority, and now all you have left is fear and hatred.
The longer you keep calling people like me names, the harder you will fall in the 2010 elections. Especially since I supported Obama in the primaries...


No, "many economists" do not hold Obama responsible. Right-wing talking heads "hold Obama responsible". Other sane people realize that the downturn affected the US harder than other nations, because most of the major banking issues started here.

But again, more criticism. And US calling YOU names??? That's a fucking laugh and a half.

With every one of you calling us "Nazis", "Stalinists", and "Racists", WE'RE calling YOU names? STFU and stop embarrasing yourself.

And you "Supported Obama in the primaries"? Wow, so you didn't like Hillary Clinton. I'm so impressed. And what happened after that?
 
There is NOTHING wrong with a citizen calling for an investigation into 911.

If you havent noticed there are alot of us who think something smells about the whole thing.

and we all notice what a hypocrite you are.....you insult those who believe obama isn't eligible....yet you carry on your own consipiracy and then justify it by saying.....well, there are alot of us....

that is hack behavior
 
AND YOU ARE SO ENDEARING! YES YOU ARE CUPCAKE! :lol::lol::lol: WE ARE SUPPOSED TO WORK WITH THE LIKES OF YOU CUPCAKE??? :lol::lol::lol:

Are you trying to come on to me? Sorry I don't swing that way.

As far as "working with the likes of me" is concerned, you people have said nothing but "NO!" since day 1 of the Obama administration. You never once tried to work with anyone. All you do is get in the way.

That's the G-No-P for you.

oh poor wittle whining weenie.. Guess what? we took careful notes of your lack of support for America for eight long years. The only time you are "for country" is when your asshole is in power.. well suck it up. We have a right to complain and complain we will. but we still laugh at yer alligator tears.. boo fucking hoo.

You people are the ones that are whining, friend. You're the ones who are complaining about everything, from Glenn Beck "Crying" to your pitiful "Tea Parties".

So, yeah, boo fucking hoo.

And first you're hitting on me, and now you've been "taking careful notes" on my behavior? So you're also stalking me? Wow. I told you I don't swing that way pal.
 
Last edited:
As any amatuer economist can tell you, Unemployment is historically, the last item to improve during a recovery.

Right now, housing numbers have improved, the banks are making a profit on the government's investment, production numbers are up, and sales of durable goods have improved. In addition, the stock market is way up from the time Obama was sworn in.

Ben Bernanke and all the other major economists are all in agreement that the recovery has begun and the the economy is on the upswing.
The global economy is recovering far faster than is the US, and many economists hold Obama responsible. Many fear that our over-reactions of the spring may cause a double-dip recession.

Finance & Development: September 2009 -- IMF

But what do you care about that? The job of the G-No-P is apparently to keep up as much criticism for as long as possible to keep people scared of that "liberal, black president".

You're a pitiful bunch of losers who failed horribly in your job when you were in the majority, and now all you have left is fear and hatred.
The longer you keep calling people like me names, the harder you will fall in the 2010 elections. Especially since I supported Obama in the primaries...


No, "many economists" do not hold Obama responsible. Right-wing talking heads "hold Obama responsible". Other sane people realize that the downturn affected the US harder than other nations, because most of the major banking issues started here.
Greg Mankiw's Blog: How large is the fiscal hole?
Greg Mankiw's Blog: We are all supply-siders now
Greg Mankiw's Blog: Blanchard on the Outlook

Just your local Harvard Economics Professor.

Oh, and Warren Buffet for good measure:

Buffett: Debt Mountain Could Turn America Into A Banana Republic

But again, more criticism. And US calling YOU names??? That's a fucking laugh and a half.

With every one of you calling us "Nazis", "Stalinists", and "Racists", WE'RE calling YOU names? STFU and stop embarrasing yourself.
Look through my 700-some posts here, and get back to me. You're making 60% of the country your enemy.

And you "Supported Obama in the primaries"? Wow, so you didn't like Hillary Clinton. I'm so impressed. And what happened after that?
I discovered Jeremiah Wright, which helped me discover Bob Barr.
 
Last edited:
Are you trying to come on to me? Sorry I don't swing that way.

As far as "working with the likes of me" is concerned, you people have said nothing but "NO!" since day 1 of the Obama administration. You never once tried to work with anyone. All you do is get in the way.

That's the G-No-P for you.

oh poor wittle whining weenie.. Guess what? we took careful notes of your lack of support for America for eight long years. The only time you are "for country" is when your asshole is in power.. well suck it up. We have a right to complain and complain we will. but we still laugh at yer alligator tears.. boo fucking hoo.

You people are the ones that are whining friend. You're the ones who are complaining about everything, from Glenn Beck "Crying" to your pitiful "Tea Parties".

So, yeah, boo fucking hoo.

And first you're hitting on me, and now you've been "taking careful notes" on my behavior? So you're also stalking me? Wow. I told you I don't swing that way pal.

so engaging in conversation is "hitting on"? just say the word and I'll stop talking to you. I aim to please. We await your orders oh whiny piss poor protplasam.. yes we do.. and, I ain't yer pal.. stalking?? hitting on? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: try MOCKING.
 
There is NOTHING wrong with a citizen calling for an investigation into 911.

If you havent noticed there are alot of us who think something smells about the whole thing.

but most people just think that you smell

what are you, a 5 year old? am i visiting a board for kindergartners by mistake?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why people think acting like a toddler makes their argument or position stronger is beyond comprehension!???

sheesh....you guys soooooo need to grow up and act like adults for a change....

i am getting really sick of these immature post rantings wasting good valuable space on this site!

care
 
oh poor wittle whining weenie.. Guess what? we took careful notes of your lack of support for America for eight long years. The only time you are "for country" is when your asshole is in power.. well suck it up. We have a right to complain and complain we will. but we still laugh at yer alligator tears.. boo fucking hoo.

You people are the ones that are whining friend. You're the ones who are complaining about everything, from Glenn Beck "Crying" to your pitiful "Tea Parties".

So, yeah, boo fucking hoo.

And first you're hitting on me, and now you've been "taking careful notes" on my behavior? So you're also stalking me? Wow. I told you I don't swing that way pal.

so engaging in conversation is "hitting on"? just say the word and I'll stop talking to you. I aim to please. We await your orders oh whiny piss poor protplasam.. yes we do.. and, I ain't yer pal.. stalking?? hitting on? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: try MOCKING.

If your interpretation of "engaging in conversation" is telling the other person they are "endearing" and using pet names for them like "Cupcake", then yeah, that's hitting on someone. And, as I said, I'm not interested.

And taking careful notes of someone's behavior is indeed the definition of "stalking", so really, just stop now while you're behind.
 
You people are the ones that are whining friend. You're the ones who are complaining about everything, from Glenn Beck "Crying" to your pitiful "Tea Parties".

So, yeah, boo fucking hoo.

And first you're hitting on me, and now you've been "taking careful notes" on my behavior? So you're also stalking me? Wow. I told you I don't swing that way pal.

so engaging in conversation is "hitting on"? just say the word and I'll stop talking to you. I aim to please. We await your orders oh whiny piss poor protplasam.. yes we do.. and, I ain't yer pal.. stalking?? hitting on? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: try MOCKING.

If your interpretation of "engaging in conversation" is telling the other person they are "endearing" and using pet names for them like "Cupcake", then yeah, that's hitting on someone. And, as I said, I'm not interested.

And taking careful notes of someone's behavior is indeed the definition of "stalking", so really, just stop now while you're behind.

what a moron,, taking careful notes referred to the whole of your asshole party.. so a simple yes or no will do.. do you want me to talk to you or not.. yes or no??? let's hear it moron! :lol: oh and I apologize for calling you "cupcake" moron is much much better donchyathink?
 
Last edited:
so engaging in conversation is "hitting on"? just say the word and I'll stop talking to you. I aim to please. We await your orders oh whiny piss poor protplasam.. yes we do.. and, I ain't yer pal.. stalking?? hitting on? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: try MOCKING.

If your interpretation of "engaging in conversation" is telling the other person they are "endearing" and using pet names for them like "Cupcake", then yeah, that's hitting on someone. And, as I said, I'm not interested.

And taking careful notes of someone's behavior is indeed the definition of "stalking", so really, just stop now while you're behind.

what a moron,, taking careful notes referred to the whole of your asshole party.. so a simple yes or no will do.. do you want me to talk to you or not.. yes or no??? let's hear it moron! :lol: oh and I apologize for calling you "cupcake" moron is much much better donchyathink?

LOL. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
 
If your interpretation of "engaging in conversation" is telling the other person they are "endearing" and using pet names for them like "Cupcake", then yeah, that's hitting on someone. And, as I said, I'm not interested.

And taking careful notes of someone's behavior is indeed the definition of "stalking", so really, just stop now while you're behind.

what a moron,, taking careful notes referred to the whole of your asshole party.. so a simple yes or no will do.. do you want me to talk to you or not.. yes or no??? let's hear it moron! :lol: oh and I apologize for calling you "cupcake" moron is much much better donchyathink?

LOL. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.

hey moron,, would that be a Yes or a NO..
 
Forget Van Jones, The Majority Of Americans Question 9/11
Text size
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, September 4, 2009



Controversial Fox News television host Glenn Beck along with a host of other establishment talking heads are again attempting to create the perception that questioning the official story behind 9/11 is a fringe belief, when in fact numerous polls show that the majority of Americans have questions about the attacks as the tragedy approaches its eighth anniversary.

Citing the fact that Obama’s green jobs czar Van Jones, who is increasingly and justifiably coming under fire from conservatives in light of his Communist rhetoric and his socialist ideals, signed a petition in 2004 calling for a proper investigation into whether the U.S. government allowed 9/11 to happen, Beck and others have used the “9/11 truther” label as a smear with which to further attack Van Jones’ credibility.

During his show yesterday, Beck tied Van Jones’ advocacy for 9/11 truth to his “radical, progressive and Communist nonsense” and implied that questions about 9/11 truth were held only by a small minority of mainly leftist Hollywood personalities.

However, despite efforts to portray people with questions about 9/11 as some kind of lunatic fringe minority, numerous polls in the years since the attacks manifestly prove that a majority of Americans share doubts and questions about the 9/11 attacks. Those people include former presidents and respected intelligence veterans, not merely leftist progressives as Beck insinuates.

The Parliament of Japan, the former President of Italy, and widely-respected CIA veteran Robert Baer have all questioned the official story behind 9/11.

Since the attacks, a top former member of Tony Blair’s cabinet, Germany’s Secretary of Defense and the founder of Reagonomics have all slammed the official story – along with a cacophony of former government, military, intelligence and political professionals.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

In addition, the majority of victim’s family members doubt the official story and have been pushing for a new investigation for years – as attested to by Bill Doyle, head of the largest victim’s family support group.

An October 2006 New York Times/CBS poll found that a paltry 16% of Americans thought the government was telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks, meaning 84% doubted the accuracy of the official story.

Forget Van Jones, The Majority Of Americans Question 9/11
 
Nat'l Geo did a special the other evening on 9-11 truthers. One gentleman kindly pointed out "Truthers are stopped dead in their tracks when you aske them for details." :lol::lol::lol:
 
I would bet that not one of you buffoons even know what a communist is, nor why it would matter? You're like a bunch of raving drunk fans, screaming for your team. But folks your team failed - Reagan and Bush and Bush failed, wake up, you lost, the American people voted you failures out. Give the new team a chance before you whimpering loonies cry like your media hero. Go back to cleaning your guns and raising your ten kids, or living with mommy and daddy.
Well, for starters, this guy was the father of all Communists.
marx01.jpg


Mr. Marx helped form the German Social Democrat Party in 1874 through the First International.

The German Social Democratic Party still exists to this day, and is part of the ruling coalition in Germany.

It is a part of the Socialist International, also known as the Third International. The Socialist International is connected to dozens socialist parties across the globe,

Van Jones was a member of STORM: Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement organization during the 1990s, an organization linked to the Socialist International, among other things. This was before he became involved with the 9/11 Truther movement.

Now, Van Jones is in charge of creating "green" government jobs...a socialist's wet dream.


Now run away from the facts, as you always do.

You are using what happened in the political arena 145 years ago to rationalize your argument?

I guess based on that logic, we can conclude that all white Southerners are racist crackers who support slavery, lynchings and the Ku Klux Klan!
 
LOL. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
LWC, do you think Obama should fire Van Jones for his 9/11 conspiracy beliefs?

OK, this is a rational question.

No, I don't.

I personally don't feel that there needs to be further investigation into 9/11.

However, people who feel that there should be should not be fired for their belief.

Just like all those right-wing congressmen that keep on questioning Obama's birth certificate shouldn't be fired.

Laughed at yes, fired no.
 
You are using what happened in the political arena 145 years ago to rationalize your argument?
You've never heard of post-colonialism? The same sort of analysis can easily be applied to the socialism movement, replacing Great Britain with the USSR.

Indeed, no event occurs in a vacuum, and 145 years is but a blink in the tale of human existence.
 
Last edited:
LOL. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
LWC, do you think Obama should fire Van Jones for his 9/11 conspiracy beliefs?

OK, this is a rational question.

No, I don't.

I personally don't feel that there needs to be further investigation into 9/11.

However, people who feel that there should be should not be fired for their belief.

Just like all those right-wing congressmen that keep on questioning Obama's birth certificate shouldn't be fired.

Laughed at yes, fired no.
I disagree. Thank you for answering honestly and directly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top