USMB Poll

[Ernie S.]

Well, it's very early obviously, but this is showing the exact kind of landslide we can expect in November - with Obama having a paltry 20% that even independents will receive...

President Obama 247 Governor Romney 191

RealClearPolitics - 2012 Election Maps - Electoral Map

Colorado President Obama 2.3, 7 polls, Obama leading in 6 of them

Florida President Obama 2.2 8 polls, Obama leading in 6 of them

Iowa President Obama 4.0 3 polls, Obama leading in 2 of them

Nevada President Obama 3.4 5 polls, Obama leading in all of them

New Hampshire President Obama 1.0 3 polls, Obama leading in 2 of them

North Carolina President Obama 1.0 5 polls, Obama leading in 4 of them

Ohio President Obama 4.1 6 polls, Obama leading in all of them

Virginia President Obama 4.5 7 polls, Obama leading in all of them.

Easy to see why the fruitloops are so upset with the polls.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - Virginia: Romney vs. Obama

Not a single tossup state in Romney's column.

Check this out, Old Rocks in the head.

UnSkewed Polls -- erasing the bias to show an accurate picture of politics

 

[P@triot]

Wake up; you are dreaming. 11/6 will be a nightmare for you I suspect.

Well, considering this unbiased poll open to all USMB posters and Obama is not only getting crushed by Romney, but might just lose to "Other", your false bravado means nothing. Wonder how panic stricken you felt when you saw this poll of Obama getting annihilated. Must have given you a flashback to November 2010 when the Tea Party owned your ass.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Riiiiight - you're the one admittedly voting for Gary Johnson to submarine Romney's candidacy because he beat Ron Paul and you can't get over your butt-hurt about it...

You're also pissed that I exposed your ignorance on the Constitution you pretend to love...

Actually you've clearly never read the 10th Amendment. You basically took the liberal view of the Constitution.

I've read the entire Constitution over and over and over. Don't try to deflect from your boys ignorance that state speed limits and state seat belt laws are unconstitutional when they couldn't possibly be any more Constitutional.

The 10th Amendment (which you have 0 clue about) in a nutshell reserves all powers to the state that are not delegated to the federal government. Since both speed limits and seat belt laws vary from state to state and are controlled by each state, Dissent could not have used a worse example. He's already exposed his ignorance, and by trying to defend his monumental error, your now exposing yours.

Just proves that you libtards don't know a damn thing about the Constitution (just like the Dumbocrat libtards). The only difference is, you pretend to honor it so you can attempt to pervert it for your anarchist ideology while the Dumbocrats (for the most part) just acknowledge their disregard of it.

Yes, that's why the federal government coerces the state government's to set the speed limits that it wants, right?

 

[P@triot]

Yes, that's why the federal government coerces the state government's to set the speed limits that it wants, right?

"Coerces"? Really? How does that work, considering that the speed limits not only vary drastically state to state, but actually vary drastically within various area's of the same state?

By the way, even if that absurdity were true, then you have a state issue - not a federal issue. Rather than blaming Romney, why don't you replace your state representatives for their corruption and allowing themselves to be "coerced"?

Ironic how libertarians claim to be the party of constitutional government, but then look to the federal government like Dumbocrats to solve all problems. So why are you looking to the federal government when it's your state representatives who are being "coerced"???

(I love exposing the fakes for what they are)

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Yes, that's why the federal government coerces the state government's to set the speed limits that it wants, right?

"Coerces"? Really? How does that work, considering that the speed limits not only vary drastically state to state, but actually vary drastically within various area's of the same state?

By the way, even if that absurdity were true, then you have a state issue - not a federal issue. Rather than blaming Romney, why don't you replace your state representatives for their corruption and allowing themselves to be "coerced"?

Ironic how libertarians claim to be the party of constitutional government, but then look to the federal government like Dumbocrats to solve all problems. So why are you looking to the federal government when it's your state representatives who are being "coerced"???

(I love exposing the fakes for what they are)

So you're blaming the victim, in other words.

 

[P@triot]

So you're blaming the victim, in other words.

Uh, how can you be a "victim" if you were a willing participant in the "crime"??? I knew you libertarian's never read the Constitution, but I had no idea that you guys didn't understand basic words like "coercion".

Oh wait, you're the people who believe that no one has to pay their taxes, no one has to stop when a police officer signals you to, and nobody has to adhere to any law.

Libertarian is just the politically correct synonym for "Soveriegn Citizen" (which is nothing more than a domestic terrorist organization)

 

[P@triot]

Yes, that's why the federal government coerces the state government's to set the speed limits that it wants, right?

Hey, all three of your candidates combined (Gary Johnson, Vermin Supreme, and Barack Obama) are getting their asses handed to them by Mitt Romney in this poll! How does that make you feel?