I doubt the product of 'representatives X money' would go down. IMO, the equation would still be 'money = corruption'.Greater numbers of reps mean fewer constituents. Fewer constituents mean campaigns are less costly. Less costly campaigns rely less on money. Less Money means Less corruption.I wouldn't want to increase the number of representatives until we change the way their elections are financed. Greater numbers would just mean more corruption, as they sell their votes for campaign contributions. If public financing were in effect, they'd have to listen to the public, not special interests.