US tax revenue chart

usgs_line.php
 
dear fucking idiot,

do you remember the housoing bubble based on false housing prices?


do you suggest it was the tax cuts done years before or will you face it was the housing bubble heady days that gave us that revenue?

Wait a minute.

So you admit that we DID enjoy record Federal tax receipts after the Bush tax cuts?


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

and we also unenjoyed a collapse of the entire world economy because of the deregulation of the lending industry.

Banks have always taken risks, but they never in world history made mindless loans to people who couldn't hope to pay them back.

What changed? Clinton forced them to do it, and greedy Wall Street saw that the gubmint was going to back him up so it was hogs to the trough on the 'too big to fail' marketplace.

If it wasn't for Clinton forever being shamed as an impeached sexual predator, this financial collapse would be his most enduring legacy.
 
who the fuck is that guy and why should I trust his estimation?
 
Heres a fucking clue,


SPIKES in as chart are NOT usually a good sign.

They show instability.

You want tax revenues to come in at a steady predictable level not spiking up and down like they are on crack


I'll file this under "even a broken clock is correct twice per day".

Yes, steady predictable tax receipts should be the goal of tax policy (in order to fund the proper functions of government). This is why increasing rates, expiring rates, temporary credits, tax holidays etc. are inane.
 

How about running a report that shows receipts vs. outlays, and get back to us with some cogent and insightful commentary, preferable bereft of spelling and grammar mistakes?

Federal Budget--Receipts, Outlays, and Debt - The 2012 Statistical Abstract - U.S. Census Bureau

With all due respect, boedicca, are you OUT OF YOUR FRIGG'IN MIND????
 
the republican plan of tax cuts and war will bankrupt this country
 
here are the FACTS for you tea party tards,


tax cuts only increase revenue is VERY extraordinary conditions.


Just ask Laffer himself

This may help...

[ame=http://youtu.be/ucoP4-06O7M]Will Higher Tax Rates Balance the Budget? - YouTube[/ame]

But.... but... isn't it just better to stick it to the greedy rich people than grow the economy?

LOL
 
The first Bush cuts started in 2003. Notice how revenue went up, following the Clinton DOTCOM bubble burst of 2000-2001.

Then came this gem:

keynesians-fail+-+Copy.png
 
oh so 911 is the cover for all the tax revenue tanking?


HMMMMMM
 
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Income tax

EGTRRA generally reduced the rates of individual income taxes:
a new 10% bracket was created for single filers with taxable income up to $6,000, joint filers up to $12,000, and heads of households up to $10,000.
the 15% bracket's lower threshold was indexed to the new 10% bracket
the 28% bracket would be lowered to 25% by 2006.
the 31% bracket would be lowered to 28% by 2006
the 36% bracket would be lowered to 33% by 2006
the 39.6% bracket would be lowered to 35% by 2006

The EGTRRA in many cases lowered the taxes on married couples filing jointly by increasing the standard deduction for joint filers to between 174% and 200% of the deduction for single filers.

Additionally, EGTRRA increased the per-child tax credit and the amount eligible for credit spent on dependent child care, phased out limits on itemized deductions and personal exemptions for higher income taxpayers, and increased the exemption for the Alternative Minimum Tax, and created a new depreciation deduction for qualified property owners.

[edit] Capital gains tax

The capital gains tax on qualified gains of property or stock held for five years was reduced from 10% to 8% for those in the 15% income tax bracket.
 
Last edited:
No, the NASDAQ bubble burst is responsible for that. Then Krugman recommended a housing bubble to offset the moribund investment following yet another government sponsored economic downturn.

Then in 2003, the tax cuts were enacted and federal revenue went way up. Imagine that.
 
oh so 911 is the cover for all the tax revenue tanking?


HMMMMMM


It's a contributor to the recession of the early 2000s, you sad little sack of sophistry.

The Bush tax cuts were fully enacted after 2003, after which the economy grew quite nicely, jobs were created, and tax receipts increased...until the inevitable house of cards of the mortgage crisis fell apart.
 
The first Bush cuts started in 2003. Notice how revenue went up, following the Clinton DOTCOM bubble burst of 2000-2001.

Then came this gem:

keynesians-fail+-+Copy.png



The destruction of our currency via massive money creation means bubble after bubble after bubble. All that money seeks assets. Now, it's seeking treasuries and fueling government spending - which will be the ugliest bubble burst of all.
 
We are only going to extract 18% or so out of the economy in taxes.

We are a tad shy of that right now, so there is indeed room for the working classes to once again start paying their fair share of the burden.

Permit them to freeload, and they vote Democrat.
 

Forum List

Back
Top