US Senate insists Washington prevent nuclear Iran

Discussion in 'Politics' started by toomuchtime_, Sep 23, 2012.

  1. toomuchtime_
    Online

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,595
    Thanks Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,007
    Apparently the Israeli government is not the only government that doesn't trust Obama to take effective action to prevent Iran from acquiring nukes.
     
  2. Billo_Really
    Offline

    Billo_Really Litre of the Band

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    21,907
    Thanks Received:
    1,786
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Long Beach, Ca
    Ratings:
    +3,261
    They need to prove Iran's nuclear program has been weaponized before discussing about what we should do.
     
  3. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    14,160
    Thanks Received:
    2,594
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +4,269
    Any understanding of what "non-binding' means at all?
     
  4. toomuchtime_
    Online

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,595
    Thanks Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,007
    No, they don't. Iran needs to open up all their facilities to prove they are not trying to build nukes. And Obama needs to start taking effective action to force Iran to either open up their programs or blow up their programs or the US will lose all control over events.
     
  5. toomuchtime_
    Online

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,595
    Thanks Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,007
    It means this is the opinion of 90 US senators and if Obama is reelected and fails to follow this demand, he may well see an amendment requiring strong action tacked on to every bill that crosses his desk and probably House and Senate resolutions supporting an Israeli attack.
     
  6. Billo_Really
    Offline

    Billo_Really Litre of the Band

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    21,907
    Thanks Received:
    1,786
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Long Beach, Ca
    Ratings:
    +3,261
    So you don't believe in American values? That a person is not presumed innocent, until "proven" guilty? That's not something you embrace? You don't believe in the rule of law? Which, BTW, is what this country is based on. So you basically reject the principles this country was founded on?

    Truth and justice, is the American way. But you're no where near that, if you're gonna ressurect that Iraq WMD lie again on Iran. Different country, different lie, same formula.

    Iran hasn't threatened anyone and they haven't attacked another country in over 200 years. So what the fuck is all this war talk about? People who want war with Iran, are sick in the head.
     
  7. toomuchtime_
    Online

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,595
    Thanks Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,007
    If Iran were a citizen of the US, your post might make some sense, but since it isn't, your post makes no sense at all.
     
  8. Billo_Really
    Offline

    Billo_Really Litre of the Band

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    21,907
    Thanks Received:
    1,786
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Long Beach, Ca
    Ratings:
    +3,261
    American values are not something you can store in your closet when you travel outside the country. You either believe in this country, or you don't. Thinking that it's okay to presume people (or country's) guilty without any proof of such, is rejecting everything that is American. Our values, do not stop at our borders.
     
  9. Indofred
    Online

    Indofred Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Would this be the nukes they were about to get in 1982, the ones that could strike America about 10 years after that with the ICBMs Iran was developing or the latest lies?
     
  10. Billo_Really
    Offline

    Billo_Really Litre of the Band

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    21,907
    Thanks Received:
    1,786
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Long Beach, Ca
    Ratings:
    +3,261
    I think it's worth noting the history of right-wing lies...

    - Twenty years ago, in 1992, Netanyahu declared Iran would deploy nuclear weapons in 3-5 years.

    - In 1995, Israeli officials warned Iran would have nuclear arms by 2000.

    - In 1998, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned that Iran would have intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads by 2003 that could strike the United States.

    - Netanyahu now insists Iran will have nukes within a year. US intelligence denies this claim. Even biased UN nuclear inspectors say Iran has no nukes.​

    Even so, hysteria and disinformation about Iran’s nuclear program continues without relent, intensifying war fever in America which is in the midst of election fever.

    10 years ago, they said Iraq had WMD's, they were wrong about that!

    How many times can someone be wrong before you start realizing these people are full of shit?
     

Share This Page