US lawmakers forced to sign support of Israel

[Emanamana]

As will be Cynthia McKinney. [/QUOTE]
I agree, as with Nazism and Communism, so will Islamism be flushed down the toilet of history.[/QUOTE]

And, hopefully, NAZIonism!

PS- Israel has nuclear WMDs; Iran DOESN't.

 

[Emanamana]

Gee, when was the last time we held a peace conference in the US.

We hold many peace conferences. But holding a peace conference at the same country who's leaders deny the Holocaust and routinely call for the destruction of Israel should perhaps be called war conference.

How about listing just the last two.

The Israel-First crowd likes to overlook the FACT that True Torah Jews not only attended, but also SUPPORTED the Iran Conference on the Holocaust, which was a FREE and OPEN discussion about the events of WWII. ("Denial" to them is anyone who wants the Truth.)

Also, they will NEVER address the FACT that 20,000+ Jews PREFER to live in Iran, rather than Israel, even when offered bribes to "make aliyah".

Finally, they will NEVER quote an actual translation of what Ahmadinejad really said about the corrupt government of Israel. Clue: It was NOT about "killing all the Jews"!

 

[Lipush]

Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate who hasn't bowed at the altar of AIPAC.

PS- When was the last time you heard anything other than the Zionist view in the media?

Are you serious? The Media is purely pro-Palestinian in 99% of the world

 

[Roudy]

Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate who hasn't bowed at the altar of AIPAC.

PS- When was the last time you heard anything other than the Zionist view in the media?

Ron Paul can eat shit. Him and his three supporters.

 

[Roudy]

We hold many peace conferences. But holding a peace conference at the same country who's leaders deny the Holocaust and routinely call for the destruction of Israel should perhaps be called war conference.

How about listing just the last two.

The Israel-First crowd likes to overlook the FACT that True Torah Jews not only attended, but also SUPPORTED the Iran Conference on the Holocaust, which was a FREE and OPEN discussion about the events of WWII. ("Denial" to them is anyone who wants the Truth.)

Also, they will NEVER address the FACT that 20,000+ Jews PREFER to live in Iran, rather than Israel, even when offered bribes to "make aliyah".

Finally, they will NEVER quote an actual translation of what Ahmadinejad really said about the corrupt government of Israel. Clue: It was NOT about "killing all the Jews"!

Finally, you're fulla shit. Nobody in the Jewish community recognizes this group of whackos called "true Torah Jews" and 2- The conference was not open but rather a competition to see who could be more anti Israel and provide more BS Holocaust denying propoganda. 3- Your statments regarding Iranian Jews is a complete lie.

Anti Semetism in Iran
Less than three decades after the revolution, approximately two-thirds of the Jewish community (including most of the religious and social leadership) have left Iran. In 2007, an estimated 25,000 Jews remain there. Although there has been no actual governmental incitement or systematic harassment, “the Iranian Jews have received harsher treatment” than other recognized religious minorities − excluding the Baha’is.[6]

Khomeini’s doctrine, as formulated prior to the Islamic Revolution, contained distinct anti-Jewish elements, combining Shi‘i ideology with typical elements of European antisemitism. On the first page of his book Al-Hukumah al-Islamiyyah (Islamic Governance), Khomeini pointed out: “Since its inception, the Islamic movement has been afflicted with the Jews,” who “established anti-Islamic propaganda and joined in various stratagems, and as you can see, this activity continues down to our present day.” The Prophet Muhammad “eliminated” the Jews of the Bani Qurayza, Khomeini recalled, because they were a troublesome group, corrupting Muslim society and “damaging Islam and the Islamic state.”[7] In his earlier book, Touzih al-Masa'el (Clarification of the Questions), he emphasized the Shi‘i doctrine of the ritual impurity of unbelievers (nejasat), listing “eleven things that contaminated,” including sperm, dogs, pigs, carrion and unbelievers: the latter’s entire body is unclean; even their “hair and fingernails and [bodily] secretion.” Products which cannot be purified (such as food) should not be bought from infidels.[8] A school textbook on Islamic culture and religion from the early years of the revolution which discussed “impure things [chizhaye napak],” similarly refers to causes of disease (microbes and viruses) and then lists the impure things, including dog, pig, alcohol, excrement, and infidels.[9] In contrast to the nationalistic Pahlavi rule, which held the Jews as equals, Khomeini’s Islamic doctrine inevitably led to the Jews being treated as inferior to the Muslim majority.

HOLOCAUST DENIAL

Tehran Times seemed especially obsessed with the Holocaust. Perhaps “the biggest lie in history,” one article maintained, took shape during the Nuremberg trials, where confessions “obtained by means of torture” became “the cornerstone of the official Auschwitz version.”[42] No one has ever asked the “gas chamber witnesses” any critical questions and, thus, “the terrible accusation” of genocide, remained based upon “the lies of a handful of Jewish swindlers like Rudolf Vrba, Filip Mueller and Elie Wiesel,” and “the confessions of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss who was tortured for three days before signing the statement his tormentors had prepared for him.”[43] There is no evidence on record for the gassing “of even one human being in a German camp,” it added, and German documents “directly refute” the “Holocaust story.”[44] According to an article published in Tehran Times, about 150,000 prisoners died in Auschwitz, “mostly from diseases.” There were also executions, it admitted, but this was only “for acts of resistance and sabotage.” Yet, it complained, the “massive reductions” of the Auschwitz death toll do not affect the “sacrosanct figure” of six million Jewish victims, which “remains as solid as the pyramids.”[45] Had Auschwitz been an extermination camp, another article in the Tehran Times suggested, “virtually no Jew would have survived it,” yet memoirs of former Auschwitz inmates filled entire libraries. Such “professional survivors” who present themselves as witnesses of the Holocaust are themselves “living proof that the alleged extermination of the Jews did not take place.”[46]

Another Tehran Times article reiterated that the Holocaust, “one of the biggest frauds of the outgoing century,” was a story “made up by Zionists to blackmail the West.” It regretted that those who dared to reveal ‘the truth’ were persecuted. One such case was the Swiss Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, who “proved with logic and evidence” that the Zionists’ claim was “false and unsubstantiated,” and was consequently sentenced to one year in prison under the Swiss anti-racism law. Similarly, in Britain, David Irving lost his libel battle in a British court to defend his views on the Holocaust. Yet, while the West paid reparations for “baseless claims,” it turned a blind eye to the Palestinians’ suffering. Their attitude, the article declared, was “a token of their subservience to Zionist circles, particularly their submission to the pro-Zionist US administration.”[47] The Jews claimed a “right to be paranoid,” another article continued, because they felt that the world was “after them.” Yet, not only governments, but all major publishing houses, newspapers and the entertainment industry in the US were headed by Jews. However, did being “historically persecuted,” give them the right to rule the world, to “occupy it, usurp it, control it?”[48] Most international financial institutions in the world, another article continued, were controlled and run by Zionists. Zionists prepared the ground through propaganda bombardment and brainwashing public opinion. They could even prevent scientific research if its conclusions did not fit their line. Thus, it asserted, Roger Garaudy wrote a book, “based purely on research,” which challenged the Holocaust and other notions exaggerating the number of Jews killed, but due to Zionist influence in the French judicial system, he was “fined for revealing historical facts.”[49]

While Garaudy was the main guest of honor in Iran in 1998, other figures known for Holocaust distortion were also welcomed. German-born Fredrick Toben (who lives in Australia) arrived in December 1999. According to Kayhan International article, Toben was sentenced to jail in Germany (but subsequently released) in November 1999 for having exposed the fabrications of the gas chambers. Hitler was criminal, the article agreed, but why distort facts “to magnify the killings of a few thousand Jews into the preposterous figure of six million.” In the Christian West, it noted, one could insult Jesus Christ and the fundamentals of the faith, but it was “a crime to question the holocaust.” Any research on the number of Jews killed, brought on “the wrath of Zion.”[50]

IRANIAN HOLOCAUST DENIAL

 

[Roudy]

As will be Cynthia McKinney.

I agree, as with Nazism and Communism, so will Islamism be flushed down the toilet of history.[/QUOTE]

And, hopefully, NAZIonism!

PS- Israel has nuclear WMDs; Iran DOESN't.[/QUOTE]
Looks like another IslamoNazi worshipping lunatic made it's way to this board. Ha ha ha!

 

[GHook93]

LOL, you are talk about McKinney who says 9/11 was an inside job. Your as unintelligent as she is!

Cynthia McKinney US lawmakers forced to sign support of Israel - YouTube

 

[eots]

How about listing just the last two.

The Israel-First crowd likes to overlook the FACT that True Torah Jews not only attended, but also SUPPORTED the Iran Conference on the Holocaust, which was a FREE and OPEN discussion about the events of WWII. ("Denial" to them is anyone who wants the Truth.)

Also, they will NEVER address the FACT that 20,000+ Jews PREFER to live in Iran, rather than Israel, even when offered bribes to "make aliyah".

Finally, they will NEVER quote an actual translation of what Ahmadinejad really said about the corrupt government of Israel. Clue: It was NOT about "killing all the Jews"!

Finally, you're fulla shit. Nobody in the Jewish community recognizes this group of whackos called "true Torah Jews" and 2- The conference was not open but rather a competition to see who could be more anti Israel and provide more BS Holocaust denying propoganda. 3- Your statments regarding Iranian Jews is a complete lie.

Anti Semetism in Iran
Less than three decades after the revolution, approximately two-thirds of the Jewish community (including most of the religious and social leadership) have left Iran. In 2007, an estimated 25,000 Jews remain there. Although there has been no actual governmental incitement or systematic harassment, “the Iranian Jews have received harsher treatment” than other recognized religious minorities − excluding the Baha’is.[6]

Khomeini’s doctrine, as formulated prior to the Islamic Revolution, contained distinct anti-Jewish elements, combining Shi‘i ideology with typical elements of European antisemitism. On the first page of his book Al-Hukumah al-Islamiyyah (Islamic Governance), Khomeini pointed out: “Since its inception, the Islamic movement has been afflicted with the Jews,” who “established anti-Islamic propaganda and joined in various stratagems, and as you can see, this activity continues down to our present day.” The Prophet Muhammad “eliminated” the Jews of the Bani Qurayza, Khomeini recalled, because they were a troublesome group, corrupting Muslim society and “damaging Islam and the Islamic state.”[7] In his earlier book, Touzih al-Masa'el (Clarification of the Questions), he emphasized the Shi‘i doctrine of the ritual impurity of unbelievers (nejasat), listing “eleven things that contaminated,” including sperm, dogs, pigs, carrion and unbelievers: the latter’s entire body is unclean; even their “hair and fingernails and [bodily] secretion.” Products which cannot be purified (such as food) should not be bought from infidels.[8] A school textbook on Islamic culture and religion from the early years of the revolution which discussed “impure things [chizhaye napak],” similarly refers to causes of disease (microbes and viruses) and then lists the impure things, including dog, pig, alcohol, excrement, and infidels.[9] In contrast to the nationalistic Pahlavi rule, which held the Jews as equals, Khomeini’s Islamic doctrine inevitably led to the Jews being treated as inferior to the Muslim majority.

HOLOCAUST DENIAL

Tehran Times seemed especially obsessed with the Holocaust. Perhaps “the biggest lie in history,” one article maintained, took shape during the Nuremberg trials, where confessions “obtained by means of torture” became “the cornerstone of the official Auschwitz version.”[42] No one has ever asked the “gas chamber witnesses” any critical questions and, thus, “the terrible accusation” of genocide, remained based upon “the lies of a handful of Jewish swindlers like Rudolf Vrba, Filip Mueller and Elie Wiesel,” and “the confessions of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss who was tortured for three days before signing the statement his tormentors had prepared for him.”[43] There is no evidence on record for the gassing “of even one human being in a German camp,” it added, and German documents “directly refute” the “Holocaust story.”[44] According to an article published in Tehran Times, about 150,000 prisoners died in Auschwitz, “mostly from diseases.” There were also executions, it admitted, but this was only “for acts of resistance and sabotage.” Yet, it complained, the “massive reductions” of the Auschwitz death toll do not affect the “sacrosanct figure” of six million Jewish victims, which “remains as solid as the pyramids.”[45] Had Auschwitz been an extermination camp, another article in the Tehran Times suggested, “virtually no Jew would have survived it,” yet memoirs of former Auschwitz inmates filled entire libraries. Such “professional survivors” who present themselves as witnesses of the Holocaust are themselves “living proof that the alleged extermination of the Jews did not take place.”[46]

Another Tehran Times article reiterated that the Holocaust, “one of the biggest frauds of the outgoing century,” was a story “made up by Zionists to blackmail the West.” It regretted that those who dared to reveal ‘the truth’ were persecuted. One such case was the Swiss Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, who “proved with logic and evidence” that the Zionists’ claim was “false and unsubstantiated,” and was consequently sentenced to one year in prison under the Swiss anti-racism law. Similarly, in Britain, David Irving lost his libel battle in a British court to defend his views on the Holocaust. Yet, while the West paid reparations for “baseless claims,” it turned a blind eye to the Palestinians’ suffering. Their attitude, the article declared, was “a token of their subservience to Zionist circles, particularly their submission to the pro-Zionist US administration.”[47] The Jews claimed a “right to be paranoid,” another article continued, because they felt that the world was “after them.” Yet, not only governments, but all major publishing houses, newspapers and the entertainment industry in the US were headed by Jews. However, did being “historically persecuted,” give them the right to rule the world, to “occupy it, usurp it, control it?”[48] Most international financial institutions in the world, another article continued, were controlled and run by Zionists. Zionists prepared the ground through propaganda bombardment and brainwashing public opinion. They could even prevent scientific research if its conclusions did not fit their line. Thus, it asserted, Roger Garaudy wrote a book, “based purely on research,” which challenged the Holocaust and other notions exaggerating the number of Jews killed, but due to Zionist influence in the French judicial system, he was “fined for revealing historical facts.”[49]

While Garaudy was the main guest of honor in Iran in 1998, other figures known for Holocaust distortion were also welcomed. German-born Fredrick Toben (who lives in Australia) arrived in December 1999. According to Kayhan International article, Toben was sentenced to jail in Germany (but subsequently released) in November 1999 for having exposed the fabrications of the gas chambers. Hitler was criminal, the article agreed, but why distort facts “to magnify the killings of a few thousand Jews into the preposterous figure of six million.” In the Christian West, it noted, one could insult Jesus Christ and the fundamentals of the faith, but it was “a crime to question the holocaust.” Any research on the number of Jews killed, brought on “the wrath of Zion.”[50]

IRANIAN HOLOCAUST DENIAL

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyMVWVBmGVo]The Last Days of the Big Lie - (Part 1 of 9) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[docmauser1]

Cynthia McKinney is a loyal and patriotic American who only want's the best for our nation.

Nation of islam?

 

[Roudy]

Cynthia McKinney is a loyal and patriotic American who only want's the best for our nation.

Nation of islam?

Exactly. After they booted her sorry ass out of Congress, I think she would be a good representative for Al Queda, Hamas, or Nation of Is-slime.

 

[Roudy]

The Israel-First crowd likes to overlook the FACT that True Torah Jews not only attended, but also SUPPORTED the Iran Conference on the Holocaust, which was a FREE and OPEN discussion about the events of WWII. ("Denial" to them is anyone who wants the Truth.)

Also, they will NEVER address the FACT that 20,000+ Jews PREFER to live in Iran, rather than Israel, even when offered bribes to "make aliyah".

Finally, they will NEVER quote an actual translation of what Ahmadinejad really said about the corrupt government of Israel. Clue: It was NOT about "killing all the Jews"!

Finally, you're fulla shit. Nobody in the Jewish community recognizes this group of whackos called "true Torah Jews" and 2- The conference was not open but rather a competition to see who could be more anti Israel and provide more BS Holocaust denying propoganda. 3- Your statments regarding Iranian Jews is a complete lie.

Anti Semetism in Iran
Less than three decades after the revolution, approximately two-thirds of the Jewish community (including most of the religious and social leadership) have left Iran. In 2007, an estimated 25,000 Jews remain there. Although there has been no actual governmental incitement or systematic harassment, “the Iranian Jews have received harsher treatment” than other recognized religious minorities − excluding the Baha’is.[6]

Khomeini’s doctrine, as formulated prior to the Islamic Revolution, contained distinct anti-Jewish elements, combining Shi‘i ideology with typical elements of European antisemitism. On the first page of his book Al-Hukumah al-Islamiyyah (Islamic Governance), Khomeini pointed out: “Since its inception, the Islamic movement has been afflicted with the Jews,” who “established anti-Islamic propaganda and joined in various stratagems, and as you can see, this activity continues down to our present day.” The Prophet Muhammad “eliminated” the Jews of the Bani Qurayza, Khomeini recalled, because they were a troublesome group, corrupting Muslim society and “damaging Islam and the Islamic state.”[7] In his earlier book, Touzih al-Masa'el (Clarification of the Questions), he emphasized the Shi‘i doctrine of the ritual impurity of unbelievers (nejasat), listing “eleven things that contaminated,” including sperm, dogs, pigs, carrion and unbelievers: the latter’s entire body is unclean; even their “hair and fingernails and [bodily] secretion.” Products which cannot be purified (such as food) should not be bought from infidels.[8] A school textbook on Islamic culture and religion from the early years of the revolution which discussed “impure things [chizhaye napak],” similarly refers to causes of disease (microbes and viruses) and then lists the impure things, including dog, pig, alcohol, excrement, and infidels.[9] In contrast to the nationalistic Pahlavi rule, which held the Jews as equals, Khomeini’s Islamic doctrine inevitably led to the Jews being treated as inferior to the Muslim majority.

HOLOCAUST DENIAL

Tehran Times seemed especially obsessed with the Holocaust. Perhaps “the biggest lie in history,” one article maintained, took shape during the Nuremberg trials, where confessions “obtained by means of torture” became “the cornerstone of the official Auschwitz version.”[42] No one has ever asked the “gas chamber witnesses” any critical questions and, thus, “the terrible accusation” of genocide, remained based upon “the lies of a handful of Jewish swindlers like Rudolf Vrba, Filip Mueller and Elie Wiesel,” and “the confessions of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss who was tortured for three days before signing the statement his tormentors had prepared for him.”[43] There is no evidence on record for the gassing “of even one human being in a German camp,” it added, and German documents “directly refute” the “Holocaust story.”[44] According to an article published in Tehran Times, about 150,000 prisoners died in Auschwitz, “mostly from diseases.” There were also executions, it admitted, but this was only “for acts of resistance and sabotage.” Yet, it complained, the “massive reductions” of the Auschwitz death toll do not affect the “sacrosanct figure” of six million Jewish victims, which “remains as solid as the pyramids.”[45] Had Auschwitz been an extermination camp, another article in the Tehran Times suggested, “virtually no Jew would have survived it,” yet memoirs of former Auschwitz inmates filled entire libraries. Such “professional survivors” who present themselves as witnesses of the Holocaust are themselves “living proof that the alleged extermination of the Jews did not take place.”[46]

Another Tehran Times article reiterated that the Holocaust, “one of the biggest frauds of the outgoing century,” was a story “made up by Zionists to blackmail the West.” It regretted that those who dared to reveal ‘the truth’ were persecuted. One such case was the Swiss Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, who “proved with logic and evidence” that the Zionists’ claim was “false and unsubstantiated,” and was consequently sentenced to one year in prison under the Swiss anti-racism law. Similarly, in Britain, David Irving lost his libel battle in a British court to defend his views on the Holocaust. Yet, while the West paid reparations for “baseless claims,” it turned a blind eye to the Palestinians’ suffering. Their attitude, the article declared, was “a token of their subservience to Zionist circles, particularly their submission to the pro-Zionist US administration.”[47] The Jews claimed a “right to be paranoid,” another article continued, because they felt that the world was “after them.” Yet, not only governments, but all major publishing houses, newspapers and the entertainment industry in the US were headed by Jews. However, did being “historically persecuted,” give them the right to rule the world, to “occupy it, usurp it, control it?”[48] Most international financial institutions in the world, another article continued, were controlled and run by Zionists. Zionists prepared the ground through propaganda bombardment and brainwashing public opinion. They could even prevent scientific research if its conclusions did not fit their line. Thus, it asserted, Roger Garaudy wrote a book, “based purely on research,” which challenged the Holocaust and other notions exaggerating the number of Jews killed, but due to Zionist influence in the French judicial system, he was “fined for revealing historical facts.”[49]

While Garaudy was the main guest of honor in Iran in 1998, other figures known for Holocaust distortion were also welcomed. German-born Fredrick Toben (who lives in Australia) arrived in December 1999. According to Kayhan International article, Toben was sentenced to jail in Germany (but subsequently released) in November 1999 for having exposed the fabrications of the gas chambers. Hitler was criminal, the article agreed, but why distort facts “to magnify the killings of a few thousand Jews into the preposterous figure of six million.” In the Christian West, it noted, one could insult Jesus Christ and the fundamentals of the faith, but it was “a crime to question the holocaust.” Any research on the number of Jews killed, brought on “the wrath of Zion.”[50]

IRANIAN HOLOCAUST DENIAL

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyMVWVBmGVo]The Last Days of the Big Lie - (Part 1 of 9) - YouTube[/ame]

Holocaust Denial = Anti Semetism = Mental Illness

Id-eots hero leaves prison:

Leading Holocaust Denier Leaves German Prison

Longtime Hitler enthusiast and Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel was released from a German prison on Monday after serving five years for the crime of inciting racial hatred.
In the late 1990s, Zundel was investigated anew by Canadian authorities, this time for promoting hatred against Jews on his website. In 2000, he moved to Sevierville, Tenn., and married a fellow Holocaust denier named Ingrid Rimland (who had run Zundel’s website for years).

Carter said,
on March 4th, 2010 at 11:31 am

One reason why I have NEVER given an once of credence to the holocaust deniers is that my father (now dead) fought in WWII and w/ Patton’s 3rd Army SAW the Camps.
They were real. They were death camps and the horror he saw he spoke of only twice.
The bodies were stacked like cord-wood and bulldozers were need to move the mountains of a Hellish nightmare,
That is until Patton made the locals and the camp guards who had been caught and those that were too slow to run away, deal with bodies – beyond description. These people where too beaten down to even speak. Some that did so, whispered things he could not say without stopping himself & tightening his jaw.

Snorlax said,
on March 4th, 2010 at 2:30 pm

Holocaust denial is a criminal offense in many European countries, is tort libel in Britain, and should be regarded as evidence of mental illness in any civilized nation.

I think these holocaust deniers are a danger to themselves and others and belong in straitjackets in rubber rooms.

And they’re not mentally well until they disavow their delusional belief in the “Holohoax”.

The Holocaust was REAL. Holocaust deniers are delusional.


Leading Holocaust Denier Leaves German Prison | Hatewatch | Southern Poverty Law Center

 

[Hossfly]

Contrary to what the vast majority of American's think.

Israel is Not our 51st state.

Nor is there anything in the Constitution about defending or supporting Israel.

True story

It's been proposed for Israel to become the 51st state. Not a bad idea.

 

[pbel]

Contrary to what the vast majority of American's think.

Israel is Not our 51st state.

Nor is there anything in the Constitution about defending or supporting Israel.

True story

It's been proposed for Israel to become the 51st state. Not a bad idea.

Oh yea, America Land of the Free with a Jewish majority state practicing soft Apartheid with its marriege laws for Jews and Arab citizens within our borders a hundred and sixty years after our Civil War...

No thanks!

 

[Saigon]

The Israel-First crowd likes to overlook the FACT that True Torah Jews not only attended, but also SUPPORTED the Iran Conference on the Holocaust, which was a FREE and OPEN discussion about the events of WWII. ("Denial" to them is anyone who wants the Truth.)

!

Denial is saying that the Holocaust never happened - when we know it did, and have 42 million Nazi documents proving that it happened.

Revisionist is saying exactly the same thing, only with bad grammar.

Iran does not allow "free and open" discussion about anything - and neither does any Revisionist website.

 

[Saigon]

Holocaust denial is a criminal offense in many European countries, is tort libel in Britain, and should be regarded as evidence of mental illness in any civilized nation.

I think these holocaust deniers are a danger to themselves and others and belong in straitjackets in rubber rooms.

And they’re not mentally well until they disavow their delusional belief in the “Holohoax”.

The Holocaust was REAL. Holocaust deniers are delusional.

Scizophrenia is a mental illness. Paranois is a mental illness.

Holocaust denial is not a mental illness - it is simply a belief based largely on lies and distortions of history.

Calling it a mental illness is imbelilic and dishonest....what next - burning witches?

The irony here being that you have no problem at all with racism, lying about history or distortions as concepts - you only have a problem when other people do it.

 

[Artevelde]

I said McKinney is a liar, a racist and anti-American. And I can't insult her enough as she is another Jane Fonda type. My wish is that cures for cancer, Islam and people like her are soon discovered. That's my opinion, of which I am entitled, but I am not entitled to invent my own facts as many here are guilty of.

And when it was all over and time passed by.

Jane Fonda was found to be on the correct side of history.

As will be Cynthia McKinney.

I suggest you talk to the Vietnamese boat people to ask them if Jane Fonda was on the right side of history.

 

[Artevelde]

Cynthia McKinney exemplifies the kind of citizen patriotism and love for the American ideals that our Founding Father exhibited.

Now you almost made me spill my coffee!

 

[Artevelde]

Cynthia McKinney. Talk about a credible source.

Who would be a better source for something Cynthia McKinney experienced herself?

You don't have to like a persons politics to listen to what they have to say and consider whether or not it might be true.

I also believe US politicians are elected to serve US interests only - if I were Americans I'd be very uncomfortable about the amount of influence an aid recipient has on the aid donor.

A paranoid lunatic is not the best source for assessing the reality of that person's life.

 

[Artevelde]

Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate who hasn't bowed at the altar of AIPAC.

PS- When was the last time you heard anything other than the Zionist view in the media?

Ron Paul can eat shit. Him and his three supporters.

While I am not a Ron Paul supporter, it's a bit ludicrous to depict him as you do. He has proven to have a substantial appeal and he has a coherent political vision and philosophy (most of which I don't share).

 

[Artevelde]

Contrary to what the vast majority of American's think.

Israel is Not our 51st state.

Nor is there anything in the Constitution about defending or supporting Israel.

True story

It's been proposed for Israel to become the 51st state. Not a bad idea.

Pretty ridiculous idea actually.