US labels Chechen resistance leader "terrorist"

He's a terrorist. Try to not let your religion get in the way of your brain.

He's a product of Russia's policy in the region. He's a perfect example of the "radicalizing" effect of foreign imperialism; Umarov didn't even know how to pray when the conflict begin and now he's proclaiming himself the Amir of an Islamic state.

What right do State Department officials have to call Amir Dokka a terrorist while they glad-hand the very thugs who created him?

Umarovx-large.jpg


HE'S NOT A TERRORIST!!!

He's a LEPRECHAUN!!!
 
The only reason the area is volatile is because there are muslims living there in large numbers.

The total population of Chechnya hovers barely over 1 million; Russia has killed hundreds of thousands. The only reason the area is volatile is because Russia denied independence to this small republic when the rest of the former Soviet Union liberated itself without facing any resistance. You get three guesses as to why. Here's a clue:

20040409_oilwell.jpg

Islam fuels the chechen revolt. Not oil.

Islam fuels the revolt to gain the wealth that comes with the oil.
 
The total population of Chechnya hovers barely over 1 million; Russia has killed hundreds of thousands. The only reason the area is volatile is because Russia denied independence to this small republic when the rest of the former Soviet Union liberated itself without facing any resistance. You get three guesses as to why. Here's a clue:

20040409_oilwell.jpg

Islam fuels the chechen revolt. Not oil.

Islam fuels the revolt to gain the wealth that comes with the oil.
Nice to see all of the resident experts weigh in on the conflict they clearly know so much about.
 
Islam fuels the chechen revolt. Not oil.

Islam fuels the revolt to gain the wealth that comes with the oil.
Nice to see all of the resident experts weigh in on the conflict they clearly know so much about.

If one boils down ALL the reasons behind 99.99% of all conflicts the common denominator is always economic. Any student of humanity and history knows this regardless of the reasons professed by each and all sides. Take an objective as opposed to subjective look.
 
Islam fuels the revolt to gain the wealth that comes with the oil.
Nice to see all of the resident experts weigh in on the conflict they clearly know so much about.

If one boils down ALL the reasons behind 99.99% of all conflicts the common denominator is always economic. Any student of humanity and history knows this regardless of the reasons professed by each and all sides. Take an objective as opposed to subjective look.
Oversimplification. Russia may have motivated by their desire to maintain control over Chechen oil, but the Chechens wouldn't have seceded from the USSR in the first place if it weren't for their purely nationalistic desire for self-determination. Islam didn't really factor into the conflict until Khattab and other Arab veterans of the Soviet-Afghan War arrived in 1995. After that, it certainly wasn't about anything economic.
 
Last edited:
I dont ever see any educated person giving a shit about a muslim . Period.
You can get thousands of idiots Siding with Palestine or muslims ,but you wont find one human being who knows anything about Islam and history siding with Islam .
 
I dont ever see any educated person giving a shit about a muslim . Period.
You can get thousands of idiots Siding with Palestine or muslims ,but you wont find one human being who knows anything about Islam and history siding with Islam .

It's cute that you think you know anything about either.
 

Forum List

Back
Top