Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are simply lucky the right wing wasn't in office; they may be contemplating a new, Patriot Act; don't complain, or well, "grab your guns".federal law is federal law; only the right wing, never gets it.
No bed wetter.
The "right wing" has "gotten it" well over 100 million times from sociopaths like you.
You'll never get away with it as long as the 2nd Amendment stands and I can move.
You are simply lucky the right wing wasn't in office; they may be contemplating a new, Patriot Act; don't complain, or well, "grab your guns".
By the way, you're an idiot, I was referring to the lawful black owner who was executed by the police for having a gun in his car.Like anti-tank weapons, mortars, hand grenades, etc. Really?a sniveling leftist tool said:Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war
You have NO POWER TO DENY 2nd Amendment protection to ANY WEAPON carried by an individual.
.
Yeah, I'm not sure about the NRA, they don't support black legal gun-owners when the police attacks them for it.The NRA and the Conservative Movement have become terrorist organizations.
What, no zombies? At conservative confab, NRA’s LaPierre lists threats to civilization, starting with the media
The first thing despots and oligarchs do is put together an enemies list.
The standard set in Heller is unusual, and dangerous....those items are unusual and dangerous......an AR-15 is common, the most common rifle in the country and no more dangerous than any other firearm.
Boy...you are stupid...equating criminals shooting at police with law abiding people.....what in idiot you are...
did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, or economics?[
attention deficits, as well right winger?
All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
I think you missed my point. Who came up with that definition? How is it enforceable by law (hint, it's not). I mean it's a nice, romantic 18th century POV, but not relevant or being capable of being enabled in this day and age.
It is in a State Constitution.
Indeed. With the first, liberty is the big thing. "your liberty ends at my nose" and all that. Having guns doesn't infringe on anyones liberty.yeah, and muslims cant stone women for getting raped. You completely missed my point.U.S. appeals court upholds Maryland's ban on assault rifles
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld Maryland's ban on assault rifles, ruling gun owners are not protected under the U.S. Constitution to possess "weapons of war," court documents showed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided 10-4 that the Firearm Safety Act of 2013, a law in response to the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, by a gunman with an assault rifle, does not violate the right to bear arms within the Second Amendment.
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote
---------
Extend it? WTF is that supposed to mean?
I assume, for the sake of consistency and honor, those same people also don't think the first applies to the internet and phones? You know, because they cant "extend it?"
Or maybe any religion developed after 1787, doesn't get the same rights as one developed pre-Constitution?
IDK maybe that's not what it means
lol, the Mormon polygamists don't get the same rights for their religion.
You're arguing that the 2nd Amendment strictly interpreted prohibits any restrictions on automatic weapons, grenade launchers, rocket launchers, bazookas, etc.
Granted, I don't understand why polygamists cant marry more than oen person.. Probably for tax reasons or something? Ugh, govt shouldn't be in marriage anyways..
In the second, the big thing is "shall not be infringed"
No ones liberty should infringe on anyone elses.Indeed. With the first, liberty is the big thing. "your liberty ends at my nose" and all that. Having guns doesn't infringe on anyones liberty.yeah, and muslims cant stone women for getting raped. You completely missed my point.U.S. appeals court upholds Maryland's ban on assault rifles
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld Maryland's ban on assault rifles, ruling gun owners are not protected under the U.S. Constitution to possess "weapons of war," court documents showed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided 10-4 that the Firearm Safety Act of 2013, a law in response to the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, by a gunman with an assault rifle, does not violate the right to bear arms within the Second Amendment.
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote
---------
Extend it? WTF is that supposed to mean?
I assume, for the sake of consistency and honor, those same people also don't think the first applies to the internet and phones? You know, because they cant "extend it?"
Or maybe any religion developed after 1787, doesn't get the same rights as one developed pre-Constitution?
IDK maybe that's not what it means
lol, the Mormon polygamists don't get the same rights for their religion.
You're arguing that the 2nd Amendment strictly interpreted prohibits any restrictions on automatic weapons, grenade launchers, rocket launchers, bazookas, etc.
Granted, I don't understand why polygamists cant marry more than oen person.. Probably for tax reasons or something? Ugh, govt shouldn't be in marriage anyways..
In the second, the big thing is "shall not be infringed"
You don't care about "liberty". You care about doing what *you* want to do. You and your fellow pretend small gubmit types are fine with stepping in everyone else's rights
By the way, you're an idiot, I was referring to the lawful black owner who was executed by the police for having a gun in his car.Like anti-tank weapons, mortars, hand grenades, etc. Really?a sniveling leftist tool said:Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war
You have NO POWER TO DENY 2nd Amendment protection to ANY WEAPON carried by an individual.
.
Yeah, I'm not sure about the NRA, they don't support black legal gun-owners when the police attacks them for it.The NRA and the Conservative Movement have become terrorist organizations.
What, no zombies? At conservative confab, NRA’s LaPierre lists threats to civilization, starting with the media
The first thing despots and oligarchs do is put together an enemies list.
The standard set in Heller is unusual, and dangerous....those items are unusual and dangerous......an AR-15 is common, the most common rifle in the country and no more dangerous than any other firearm.
Boy...you are stupid...equating criminals shooting at police with law abiding people.....what in idiot you are...
He had no intention of shooting the police and declared his gun.
nothing but diversion and appeals to emotions, on economic paradigms of last millennium?You are simply lucky the right wing wasn't in office; they may be contemplating a new, Patriot Act; don't complain, or well, "grab your guns".
Everyone is lucky "the right wing" took over, or your meat puppet faggot might have tried a "great leap forward" and starved another 20 million people to death.
You should seriously kill yourself. I mean that sincerely.
nothing but diversion and appeals to emotions, on economic paradigms of last millennium?
Hooverville failed; and capitalism died in 1929 and it has been bailed out by socialism, ever since.
nothing but diversion and appeals to emotions, on economic paradigms of last millennium?nothing but diversion and appeals to emotions, on economic paradigms of last millennium?
Hooverville failed; and capitalism died in 1929 and it has been bailed out by socialism, ever since.
Parasites like danny are why I do not oppose abortion.
