Unsealing the Prophetic Book of Daniel

[Edward_Palamar]

"1a. Maimonides (Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon): "Daniel has elucidated to us the knowledge of the end times. However, since they are secret, the wise [rabbis] have barred the calculation of the days of Messiah’s coming so that the untutored populace will not be led astray when they see that the End Times have already come but there is no sign of the Messiah" (Igeret Teiman, Chapter 3 p.24.)"

That is only wise until it actually is the time of the end and the explanation (interpretation) is given concerning what the angel Gabriel had said in Daniel 12:9, that the words were closed and sealed until the time of the end.

This makes the opening and unsealing of Daniel 11 & 12 one of the longest running prayer meetings of all time, if not the longest.

In less than an hour there will be 160 days until the Day of the Lord (Malachi 4:5).

Regular updates at :

Free forum : Resurrected and Raptured

 

[HaShev]

From Darter's book I learned the following:

It is interesting that the vision of 70 weeks is divided into 7 weeks, 62 weeks, and 1 week. In the first 7 weeks, or 49 years (7 weeks = 49 days and then changed to years), the walls an gates of the city of Jerusalem were eventually repaired by Nehemiah (Neh. 6:15) and brings us to 408 BC. The 62 weeks or 434 years later (62 weeks = 434 days and then changed to years) brings us to 26 AD or 27 AD if you don't count the zero year. This would be the beginning of the last 7 years of the Lord's life before being put to death. During the last week or 7 years of his life he confirmed the covenant with many: and in the midst of the week he caused the sacrifice and the oblation to cease. Jesus was 6 months younger than his cousin John the Baptist. Jesus was baptized and began his official priesthood work at the age of 30 or 6 months after John began his preaching at 30. According to Clarke's Bible Commentary, 30 years of age "was the age required by the law to which the priests must arrive before they could be installed in their office". James E. Talmage in "Jesus The Christ" adds: "To have taught in public at an earlier age would have been to arouse criticism and objection, which might have resulted in a serious handicap." So Jesus reasoned out His mission until he was 30 and then he taught as one having authority. Jesus' authoritative mission lasted 3 years leading up to his crucifixion. Thus John began his mission 3 1/2 years prior to Christ's crucifixion. This was exactly in the middle of the last week of the 70 week prophecy. Thus the offering of Mosaic sacrifices ceased 3 1/2 years prior to the crucifixion when John, who was the high priest under the Aaronic order of the priesthood, ceased doing offerings and went out into the wilderness and baptized in the river Jordan. He thus prepared the way of the Lord.

Luke 16:16
16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

The people of the prince that shall come are the Romans. Who came and destroyed Jerusalem later in 70 AD.

Its astonishing that this prophecy is so accurate.

There is so many problems with these assertions especially the claim at the end about the prophecy being so accurate when you are making it whatever you want and have in the past ignored that same astonishing accuracy when it reveals Jesus as Lucifer the son of perdition in Ezekiel 28 including the word anointed used suddenly changes focus for your placement=deception double standard.
Which means you are using reasoning that makes Jesus Lucifer, but stating the opposite=lying for Lucifer.
1-The events Daniel is prophecizing already occured before Jesus and the events of the temple you propose occured after Jesus making the correlation impossible even if you avoided history and thought it didn’t occur yet.
2-the only historical christ in the 30ad era was Theudas, you need to rewrite the historical and combine figures to create a whole new character with new nam and new birthdate=father of lies.
3-Dan 9: There is a 7-week (49-year) span between the actual destruction of Jerusalem in 586 (beginning the exile and realizing the decree in 538bc to rebuild), and the end of the exile brought about by the arrival of ‘AN’ anointed one not “THE” anointed one . Kings and High Priests were anointed as AN anointed one but not THE anointed one. Thus we must notice the wording is “an anointed one” not “THE” anointed one.

Dan 9:24 says anoint the holy place not an anointed man. Daniel 9:25 says, "from the time the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem was issued, until AN annointed one, a ruler, it will be seven weeks". If the decree is indeed sometime around the beginning of the full Exile, 586 b.c.e., then who is the anointed one mentioned? And, GOD already has referred to ruler Cyrus as his Anointed in
Isaiah 45:1: 70 years after the destruction Cyrus rebuilt the Temple in other words it's completion in 516BC
Here's the reference of this ‘70 years’ by the Historian Josephus in Antiquities 11.1.1: Ant. 11.1.1 "In the first year of the reign of Cyrus, which was the seventieth from the day that our people were removed out of their own land into Babylon, God commiserated the captivity and calamity of these poor people, according as he had foretold to them by Jeremiah the prophet, before the destruction of the city, that after they has served Nebuchadnezzar and his posterity, and after they had undergone that SERVITUDE seventy years, he would restore them again to the land of their fathers, and they should build their temple, and enjoy their ancient prosperity; and these things God did afford them."


Daniel 9:26
And after the sixty-two weeks,an anointed one will be cut off,
and there will be nothing to him.
and the people of a ruler who shall come
shall destroy the city and the sanctuary,
and the end of it/him shall be with a flood,,
and, until the end of the war, desolations are decreed.

62 weeks (434 years) leads us to around 152 b.c.e. the time of antiochus desolation and destruction of the temple. The anointed one was the king who was cut off. High Priest Onias III, who was assasinated (cut off) in 171 b.c.e. In 168 b.c.e., the middle of the next "week" of years (171-165 b.c.e.), ruler Antiochus IV (who had Onias killed) pillaged Jerusalem. Antiochus IV matches the "ruler to come",

4-Daniel already exposes Moshiach as Michael first and last name especially using your Ezra verse along with the historical knowledge of Cyrus and recognition of correlation with Jeremiah and Isaiah verses.
That means you are circumventing Daniels Moshiach with your own using false history, lying, manipulation and outright theft=you are the satanists you so love to hate. Your churches can technically be arrested on racketeering charges for selling salvation and protection even though it's they themselves we are needing protection from.

 

[HaShev]

Source for Daniels Moshiach:

10:13. But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-onedays. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, becauseI was detained there with the king of Persia.

Known fact: Isaiah 44-45 says 'the Redeemer' (La'HaSheva) fights the conciousness of Cyrus to do the anointed roles of gathering the people, re-establishing Israel and rebuilding the Temple.
Ezra 1:1 calls this the Lord who changes Cyrus heart thus stirred up the spirit of Cyrus.
Note: Dan 10 talks about Michael helping him battle with the King Prince of Persia who was Cyrus so Michael is the one being spoken of in Isaiah 44-45 and Ezra 1:1.
(proof the prince/king of Dan 10 was Cyrus comes from a little known apochrypha source chapter 14 of the greek version of Daniel.)
Daniel Chapter 14
1 After King Astyages was laid with his fathers, Cyrus the Persian succeeded to his kingdom.
2 Daniel was the king's favorite and was held in higher esteem than any of the friends of the king.
This shows the King of Persia at that time was Cyrus and that this is the reference in Dan 10 to the one Michael battled with.
King Astyages: the last of the Median kings was defeated by Cyrus in 550 B.C. This story preserves the fiction of a successive Median and Persian rule of Babylon.

Dan 12:1-4 says Michael rises to save Israel the same redeemer (HaSheva) who saves
Judah in Jeremiah 23:5-6

Dan CHAPTER TEN Verse 13: But the prince of the kingdom of the Persians resisted me one and twenty days: and behold Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, and remained there by the king of the Persians (Cyrus).

**Michael is dealing with Cyrus** thus who is Ezra 1 and Isaiah 44-45 calling LORD AND "REDEEMER"(HaSheva)?

Dan 10 And the angel said: "Do you know where I came from? And now will
*Hashev* Lacham Sar Parac"(HaShev fight the prince of Persia).

Verse 21: But I will tell thee what is set down in the scripture of truth: and none is my helper in all these things, but Michael your prince.

Conclusion; the father of lies and his minions are always taking credit for others work and revelation, placing the false prophet in everything fallaciously, teaching death worship kingdom in death,
impostering and preventing the Mikdash, creating false salvation allowing sins to flourish, preventing our progress thus Shalem, influencing and being the source of hate propaganda and cycle of seperatist violence as said he would divide and cause the fighting in Matthew, Luke, and Thomas. =true satanists exposed.

 

[Edward_Palamar]

Hashev, you gotta stop smokin' that crack.

 

[HaShev]

Hashev, you gotta stop smokin' that crack.

BUSTED!
POSTED THE BIBLE= you are saying the Bible is crack
and since it reveals something different then what Christians fallaciously claim then you are calling all Christians smoking crack.
Furthermore Jesus and the church would be the king dealer of that crack.

You shot Jesus in the foot and the religion in the back while trying to as hominom attack the poster instead of addressing the content with refutation and rebuttle.

 

[Edward_Palamar]

"The Spirit of truth . . . and the things that are to come, he shall show you." (cf. John 16:13)

The opening and unsealing which I present here is in confirmation to a previous exegesis.

In Daniel 10:14 we are assured "the vision is for days".

And then we are given an exact count, in days.

So it was that the 2nd king of Persia (of the three foretold in Daniel 11:2) lay smitten for forty days after sustaining injuries from an automobile collision until his death.

After the 3rd day of the collision he became incoherent, marking the beginning of the 3 year 7 months (Roman calendar) mirroring prophecy from the 16th century (Centuries IV:95) which led directly into the 3 year 7 month (lunar calendar) prophecy of Daniel 12:11 for which we have an exact number.

God took one of the kings foretold in Daniel 11:2 and used him as an instrument of instruction to the arrival at the accurate counting of the end of days.

Century IV : #95

A time prophecy of days doesn't need any sort of interpolation unless God expressly states so.

The rule of thumb that a day always equals a year is not true, nor accurate.

So, when there is a time prophecy,

"The Spirit of truth . . . and the things that are to come, he shall show you." (cf. John 16:13)

 

[HaShev]

See once again, Christians can't apologize or Teshuva.
quote: "The Spirit of truth . . . and the things that are to come, he shall show you." (cf. John 16:13)
Dan 10:21 what does it say about who BEST knows this truth?
For crying out loud we are discussing it and you still can't put 2+2 together.

 

[Edward_Palamar]

Given that the only two accurate English translations of Daniel 11:20 and Daniel 11:21 are the Wycliffe and Douay-Rheims versions, one needs to be careful with English commentary concerning the Book of Daniel.

Specifically, how you have been misled concerning my apparition which began months before Jesus submitted Himself to baptism.

From Darter's book I learned the following:

. . . Thus John began his mission 3 1/2 years prior to Christ's crucifixion.

Christ underwent water immersion and fulfilled the verse of Daniel 9:25, "unto Christ the prince", because the King of the Universe cut himself off for our sakes.

That was what happened 3.5 years prior to Christ's crucifixion, not the beginning of my mission.

There was also a new moon.

 

[HaShev]

You saidaniel 9:25, "unto Christ the prince", because the King of the Universe cut himself off for our sakes.

and yet the verse is not even close to what the Bible says
Dan 9:25

And through his intellect, he
will cause the deceit in his hand to
prosper, and in his heart he will
become proud, and in tranquility he
will destroy many, and over the
Prince of princes he will stand, and
without strength he will be broken.
וְעַל שִׂכְלוֹ וְהִצְלִיחַ
מִרְמָה בְּיָדוֹ וּבִלְבָבוֹ
יַגְדִּיל וּבְשַׁלְוָה יַשְׁחִית
רַבִּים וְעַל שַׂר שָׂרִים
יַעֲמֹד וּבְאֶפֶס יָד יִשָּׁבֵר :
Dan 9:26
And the vision of the evening
and the morning that was said is
true, and you close up the vision,
which will be for many days."
וּמַרְאֵה הָעֶרֶב
וְהַבֹּקֶר אֲשֶׁר נֶאֱמַר
אֱמֶת הוּא וְאַתָּה סְתֹם
הֶחָזוֹן כִּי לְיָמִים רַבִּים

Conclusion: you are an out right liar falsely teaching and placing lucifer into scripture..
Notice 9:26 mentions the vision of both morning and Evening, the fact you don't know that context is why you
follow the fallen morning star Lucifer- Jesus rev 22:16
instead of the Rising Evening Star Michael-Dan 12:1.
Hence Daniels visions of the Night.

 

[Edward_Palamar]

Lucifer

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Lucifer

Daniel 9:25 says, "from the time"

Daniel 9:25 is a good place to start as that is the only verse in the Book of Daniel that foretells Christ in Name, and that was fulfilled when Christ wilfully subjected Himself to baptism.

The problem, it seems to me, is that you are more of a terrorist than a Biblical scholar.

 

[HaShev]

You just lied again, Jesus name isn't in Dan 9, christ is not a name it means anointed and the word christ is not mentioned in Dan 9 "AN" anointed king is mentioned.
So you outright lie as does your NT.
Jesus was not a King.
By your standard Jesus has to be lucifer in Ezekiel 28:14-15 called anointed (christ) Cherub (guardian in Hebrew= Nazarene) Deemed perfect (sinless).
The only prophet ever deemed perfect was Jesus therefore only Jesus could be Lucifer.

[See here etymology of "Lucifer": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)
I Jesus am the bright morning star (Lucifer) Rev 22:16

 

[Edward_Palamar]

"Christ the prince" as found in Daniel 9:25-26 is the same Person Who is Jesus Christ, the King of the Universe, God the Father's Only-Begotten Son.

The facts that Ezekiel 28:14-15 state that the anointed cherub was created, set upon the mountain by the Lord, and that iniquity was found in him combine to a solid conclusion that such reference is not to Christ, in Whom there is no iniquity, is the Lord, and created the angels.

Although one could glean the good from those verses to apply to Christ, Luke 10:18 gives the definitive perspective of Christ as regards the falling, which goes hand in hand with your flawed logic regarding Isaiah, which are words to be spoken against the king of Babylon, not me, as I am neither the king of Babylon nor a liar.

 

[HaShev]

"Only-Begotten Son"
This is an admission you worship another God 'cause in the OT Psalm 2:7 YHWH'S begotten son is David, therefore to be the only begotten means your god is not YHWH and as I said before your worship is of Baal, who's son was the Morning Star the term Jesus referred to for himself in Rev 22:16.

 

[HaShev]

reference" is not to Christ, in Whom there is no iniquity,"

This has to be the silliest statement of the year,
the verse in Ezekiel is saying just that, you'd call your christ perfect which you just did and admit is the only prophet thus claimed thus only Jesus can fulfill Lucifer.

Your other zinger: "such reference is not to Christ"
wrong it referenced CHRIST Nazarene (anointed guardian) the only messiah figure called that.

Furthermore you failed to read all of Ezekiel 28.
It's about an image of a man claiming to be a god who falls to the pit by the hands of the seas (Rome)- acts 2:27,
1 peter 3:19 Jesus fell to the pit by the hands of Rome for claiming to be a god. Perdition means fall to the pit-hades thus Jesus who did fall to the Pit is the
"son of perdition" which also refers to being son of hades death cultism which I previous posted the verses proving they were death worshipers and Jesus as the gatekeeper of hell.

 

[Edward_Palamar]

Christ Jesus, Himself, said, "The Father and I are One." (John 10:30)

As regards the topic, however, Hashev, your kinship with Daniel 11:14 is the strongest here.

 

[HaShev]

Thank you,
you might not agree but fact is Jesus a proven compiled created character didn't say what is attributed, neither were the books written by those they are named after. The words are coming from the writer creating a character in the same way a play has characters who are given words to speak.

On the case of saying father and son are one is because Jesus is the story of Baal his father merely given the new name and mask to get Jews to worship Baal and pay taxes (in the guise of tithes)to Rome without insurection.
Research the Baal Passion play tablets.
Christianity Before Christ" by John G. Jackson, 1985,
pp. 43-46.
(A) Arthur Findlay's report of the translation by a
Professor H. Zimmern, in German, of an ancient tablet
which Jackson reports (citing Findlay) as Babylonian
dating back to circa 2000 BC now in the British
Museum in which the Babylonian myth of Bel (Baal in
Hebrew) is described in a passion play in which:
(1) Bel is taken prisoner;
(2) Bel is tried in a great hall;
(3) Bel is smitten;
(4) Bel is led away to the Mount (a sacred grove on a
hilltop);
(5) with Bel are taken two malefactors, one of whom is
released;
(6) After Bel has gone to the Mount and is executed,
the city breaks into tumult;
(7) Bel's clothes are carried away;
(8.) Bel goes down into the Mount and disappears from
life;
(9) weeping women seek Bel at the Tomb;
(10) Bel is brought back to life.
discovery of the tablet was actually
in Nineveh in Assyria, not in Babylonia, and its dated
as 700 B.C. and not 2000 B.C.
The Bel myth does in
fact have mythical elements including death and
resurrection which parallel the Jesus myth and thus are
forerunners of mythical elements in the Jesus myth.
The stone tablet discovered in Nineveh, Assyria
dated 700 B.C. is now housed in The British Museum,
and referred to by British Museum officials as the
Marduk's Ordeal tablet and not referred to as the Baal passion play as others refer to it.

In conclusion with knowing Jesus is the son of perdition who admited being the son of baal (rev 22:16) as one in the same as seen in ancient tablets then the number of his name is "Baal Jesus"=666 in ascll numerology used to secret numbers from names.

 

[shimon]

Michael it just ocurred to me that the claim the father and son are one can be easily explained as it dawned on me that when the founders of christianity took the words of the gd of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and placed the word or logos of their claimed Jesus together with the hebrew scriptures they made them "ONE" thus we see the secret and true intent of this claim ...Funny how the more they push things the more they get us to figure things out....Very interesting.....

 

[Edward_Palamar]

The mitigating factor is the prophecy of the Holy Ghost through a Hebrew convert to Catholicism, Michel de Nostradame.

So to answer your question with a direct yes or no, yes, I am familiar with the different calendars, but the interpretation, what you call here "significance", is not solely based on calendars, the most important information being the correct ascertainment of the 1,335th day of Daniel 12:12, the equivalent of the Day of the Lord (Malachi 4:5, et. al.) which has come this past Ascension Sunday, May 8, 2016 A.D., leaving in its wake a fire that has the possibility of expanding to the proportion that could cause what has been foretold in 2 Peter 3:10-14.

One of the major points of discussion during the hearings was how an "ignition of the elements" could be caused to happen, as foretold in 2 Peter 3:10-14.

Having worked procuring 3-4 cords of wood annually up until the hearings, I interjected that if there was a large enough forest fire, not only would significant amounts of smoke be released which would add to the possibility of spontaneous combustion, but significant amounts of oxygen would be depleted, the combining factors also contributing to possible despair on the part of those entrusted with nuclear armaments, and as a last ditch "mercy killing" effort would launch unnecessarily.

And that led to the prophecy of Ezekiel which reports God, Himself, speaking in the 1st Person, "I will cause a great fire to come down from Heaven."

You realize of course the Gregorian calendar (2012AD) and Hebrew calendar (5773) are completely different, so any significance you derive from Daniel (a Jewish text) has absolutely no significance if using the Gregorian calendar?

Sept 7th 2012 on the Hebrew calendar was 1 Elul 5773.

HEBREW JEWISH CALENDAR - YEAR 5773 --- FOR 2012 - 2013

 

[Edward_Palamar]

The Jewish Messiah, Jesus Christ, said :

John 10:30 Wycliffe Bible
30 I and the Father be one.

Wycliffe Bible (WYC)

It isn't a claim and you haven't figured 'anything out', it's your Jewish pride that's befuddling you.

Michael it just ocurred to me that the claim the father and son are one can be easily explained as it dawned on me that when the founders of christianity took the words of the gd of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and placed the word or logos of their claimed Jesus together with the hebrew scriptures they made them "ONE" thus we see the secret and true intent of this claim ...Funny how the more they push things the more they get us to figure things out....Very interesting.....

 

[Edward_Palamar]

That isn't the correct interpretation of those passages of Scripture.

Messias was cut off when He wilfully subjected Himself to baptism (that is foretold in the 70 weeks of years prophecy), but sacrifices in the Temple on the Mount didn't cease until it was 'sacked' in 70 A.D.

The actual abomination of desolation has only recently been worked through a long and complicated history, but the 1,335th day of Daniel 12:12 has already come this past Ascension Sunday, May 8, 2016 A.D.

Thus John began his mission 3 1/2 years prior to Christ's crucifixion. This was exactly in the middle of the last week of the 70 week prophecy. Thus the offering of Mosaic sacrifices ceased 3 1/2 years prior to the crucifixion when John, who was the high priest under the Aaronic order of the priesthood, ceased doing offerings and went out into the wilderness and baptized in the river Jordan. He thus prepared the way of the Lord.

Luke 16:16
16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

The people of the prince that shall come are the Romans. Who came and destroyed Jerusalem later in 70 AD.

Its astonishing that this prophecy is so accurate.