United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice Totally VINDICATED

[GoneBezerk]

Dumbfuck....if she is the one going out to speak to the world about what happened in Libya then she was in on the meetings going over what they would say or she is the dumbest fucking person on this planet next to you.

I bet you would gladly take a speech from Obamination 5 minutes before the TV cameras come on without knowing what you will say.....

Yeah asswipe....she wasn't in on the meetings to remove AQ from the speech. You clearly have never been involved with anything important.

You shouldn't be allowed to handle sharp objects.

And here we see a fabrication manufactured on the spot.

Unless you have evidence Rice was present in such a meeting, which you don't, then you are a lying sack of shit who, by definition, is not the slightest bit interested in learning the truth.

.

 

[g5000]

Stupid bitch....Petreaus said today the CIA stated AQ was involved in the attack but someone in the White House removed it from his notes.

Got a link that supports that claim?

.

 

[Care4all]

So Lahkota, who removed Al Qaeda from the talking points? What, you don't know. I guess no one is exonerated then.

What difference does that make if General Petraeus ok'd it?

First of all, this is what you get for reading media matters, King did not say that, here from the holy of the holies;

“The fact is, the reference to Al Qaeda was taken out somewhere along the line by someone outside the intelligence community,” Representative Peter T. King, a New York Republican, said after the House hearing. “We need to find out who did it and why.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/w...r-is-focus-at-hearings.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0


So, that aside, he takes orders, if he was told the report was being changed what , you think he'd say no I want them in? And throw a tantrum.......He had zero leverage, as we now conveniently know......

uhhhhhhh, me thinks peter king is dishonest....

Petraeus testified that the CIA draft written in response to the raid referred to militant groups Ansar al-Shariah and al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb but those names were replaced with the word "extremist" in the final draft, according to a congressional staffer. The staffer said Petraeus testified that he allowed other agencies to alter the talking points as they saw fit without asking for final review to get them out quickly.



The congressional officials weren't authorized to discuss the hearing publicly and described Petraeus' testimony to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.



Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said Petraeus explained that the CIA's draft points were sent to other intelligence agencies and to some federal agencies for review. Udall said Petraeus told them the final document was put in front of all the senior agency leaders, including Petraeus, and everyone signed off on it.



"The assessment that was publicly shared in unclassified talking points went through a process of editing," Udall said. "The extremist description was put in because in an unclassified document you want to be careful who you identify as being involved."

Petraeus: U.S. didn't reveal role of terrorists in Benghazi to avoid tipping them off - San Jose Mercury News

 

[g5000]

Not even Breitbart says it was the White House which removed the AQ notes: Rep. Peter King: Petraeus Testified Rice's Original CIA Talking Points Contained al-Qaeda Element

"The original talking points were much more specific about al-Qaeda involvement and yet the finals ones just said' indications of extremists.' It said 'indicate' even though there was clearly evidence at the CIA that there was al-Qaeda involvement."

When asked by a reporter if Petraeus knew "why" the talking points were change, King responded with, "They just said it goes through a process, an inter-agency process and when they come back that had been taken out."

Another GoneBezerk lie exposed. He did not say the White House removed the AQ notes.

Idiot. Stop making shit up.

.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Idiot...he told Congress his original report mentioned AQ, but someone removed it.

I doubt anyone below the White House would have the balls to remove AQ from a CIA report....but you are dumb enough to believe anything.

Obamination likes support from idiots like you, that's how he got re-elected to further fuck things up.

Stupid bitch....Petreaus said today the CIA stated AQ was involved in the attack but someone in the White House removed it from his notes.

Got a link that supports that claim?

.

 

[g5000]

Dumbfuck....if she is the one going out to speak to the world about what happened in Libya then she was in on the meetings going over what they would say or she is the dumbest fucking person on this planet next to you.

I bet you would gladly take a speech from Obamination 5 minutes before the TV cameras come on without knowing what you will say.....

You have no evidence for this nutter theory. You are nakedly lying now.

.

 

[GoneBezerk]

The idiot keeps babbling on....

Not even Breitbart says it was the White House which removed the AQ notes: Rep. Peter King: Petraeus Testified Rice's Original CIA Talking Points Contained al-Qaeda Element

"The original talking points were much more specific about al-Qaeda involvement and yet the finals ones just said' indications of extremists.' It said 'indicate' even though there was clearly evidence at the CIA that there was al-Qaeda involvement."

When asked by a reporter if Petraeus knew "why" the talking points were change, King responded with, "They just said it goes through a process, an inter-agency process and when they come back that had been taken out."

Another GoneBezerk lie exposed. He did not say the White House removed the AQ notes.

Idiot. Stop making shit up.

.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Ok kook....the janitor at the CIA removed the Director's assessment.

Obamination might promote you if you pass on that lie for him.

Dumbfuck....if she is the one going out to speak to the world about what happened in Libya then she was in on the meetings going over what they would say or she is the dumbest fucking person on this planet next to you.

I bet you would gladly take a speech from Obamination 5 minutes before the TV cameras come on without knowing what you will say.....

You have no evidence for this nutter theory. You are nakedly lying now.

.

 

[g5000]

GoneBezerk, read this again, moron:

"The original talking points were much more specific about al-Qaeda involvement and yet the finals ones just said' indications of extremists.' It said 'indicate' even though there was clearly evidence at the CIA that there was al-Qaeda involvement."

When asked by a reporter if Petraeus knew "why" the talking points were change, King responded with, "They just said it goes through a process, an inter-agency process and when they come back that had been taken out."

The notes were not taken out in a meeting, dumb fuck. Christ, you are inventing events which did not happen and then populating them with people who weren't there.

You are batshit insane.



.

 

[Trajan]

What difference does that make if General Petraeus ok'd it?

First of all, this is what you get for reading media matters, King did not say that, here from the holy of the holies;

“The fact is, the reference to Al Qaeda was taken out somewhere along the line by someone outside the intelligence community,” Representative Peter T. King, a New York Republican, said after the House hearing. “We need to find out who did it and why.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/w...r-is-focus-at-hearings.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0


So, that aside, he takes orders, if he was told the report was being changed what , you think he'd say no I want them in? And throw a tantrum.......He had zero leverage, as we now conveniently know......

uhhhhhhh, me thinks peter king is dishonest....

Petraeus testified that the CIA draft written in response to the raid referred to militant groups Ansar al-Shariah and al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb but those names were replaced with the word "extremist" in the final draft, according to a congressional staffer. The staffer said Petraeus testified that he allowed other agencies to alter the talking points as they saw fit without asking for final review to get them out quickly.



The congressional officials weren't authorized to discuss the hearing publicly and described Petraeus' testimony to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.



Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said Petraeus explained that the CIA's draft points were sent to other intelligence agencies and to some federal agencies for review. Udall said Petraeus told them the final document was put in front of all the senior agency leaders, including Petraeus, and everyone signed off on it.



"The assessment that was publicly shared in unclassified talking points went through a process of editing," Udall said. "The extremist description was put in because in an unclassified document you want to be careful who you identify as being involved."

Petraeus: U.S. didn't reveal role of terrorists in Benghazi to avoid tipping them off - San Jose Mercury News

this is in that article as well;

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said it remained unclear how the final talking points developed. The edited version was used by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice five days after the attack when the White House sent her out for a series of television interviews. Republicans have criticized Rice for saying it appeared the attack was sparked by a spontaneous protest over an anti-Muslim video.

"The fact is, the reference to al-Qaida was taken out somewhere along the line by someone outside the intelligence community," King said. "We need to find out who did it and why."




so lets suppose that your version is true, I am not sure that answers the big questions aside from who exactly altered them, to wit;

WHY were they taken out? Why did obama and Hillary go on for the next 12 days blaming the video? why didn't obama, in that 60 Minutes interview say it was terrorists?

 

[Lakhota]

What difference does that make if General Petraeus ok'd it?

First of all, this is what you get for reading media matters, King did not say that, here from the holy of the holies;

“The fact is, the reference to Al Qaeda was taken out somewhere along the line by someone outside the intelligence community,” Representative Peter T. King, a New York Republican, said after the House hearing. “We need to find out who did it and why.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/w...r-is-focus-at-hearings.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0


So, that aside, he takes orders, if he was told the report was being changed what , you think he'd say no I want them in? And throw a tantrum.......He had zero leverage, as we now conveniently know......

uhhhhhhh, me thinks peter king is dishonest....

Petraeus testified that the CIA draft written in response to the raid referred to militant groups Ansar al-Shariah and al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb but those names were replaced with the word "extremist" in the final draft, according to a congressional staffer. The staffer said Petraeus testified that he allowed other agencies to alter the talking points as they saw fit without asking for final review to get them out quickly.



The congressional officials weren't authorized to discuss the hearing publicly and described Petraeus' testimony to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.



Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said Petraeus explained that the CIA's draft points were sent to other intelligence agencies and to some federal agencies for review. Udall said Petraeus told them the final document was put in front of all the senior agency leaders, including Petraeus, and everyone signed off on it.



"The assessment that was publicly shared in unclassified talking points went through a process of editing," Udall said. "The extremist description was put in because in an unclassified document you want to be careful who you identify as being involved."

Petraeus: U.S. didn't reveal role of terrorists in Benghazi to avoid tipping them off - San Jose Mercury News

Precisely. It ain't rocket science...

 

[GoneBezerk]

Inter-Agency is code for the Govt cloud i.e White House appointees inthe Cabinet.

Nobody below the White House is going to remove TERRORISM information from a report provided by the CIA, you stupid piece of shit.

It woule be like if the SECDEF gives his military opinion on a matter and you believe Joe Schmoe from the FAA steps in and removes it through the "inter-agency" process....what a fucking joke.

You have never worked a day in the Govt and never had a security clearance, shut the fuck up. If I want an opinion on trailer parks, fucking dogs, etc....then you move to the front line here.

GoneBezerk, read this again, moron:

"The original talking points were much more specific about al-Qaeda involvement and yet the finals ones just said' indications of extremists.' It said 'indicate' even though there was clearly evidence at the CIA that there was al-Qaeda involvement."

When asked by a reporter if Petraeus knew "why" the talking points were change, King responded with, "They just said it goes through a process, an inter-agency process and when they come back that had been taken out."

The notes were not taken out in a meeting, dumb fuck. Christ, you are inventing events which did not happen and then populating them with people who weren't there.

You are batshit insane.



.

 

[Trajan]

First of all, this is what you get for reading media matters, King did not say that, here from the holy of the holies;

“The fact is, the reference to Al Qaeda was taken out somewhere along the line by someone outside the intelligence community,” Representative Peter T. King, a New York Republican, said after the House hearing. “We need to find out who did it and why.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/w...r-is-focus-at-hearings.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0


So, that aside, he takes orders, if he was told the report was being changed what , you think he'd say no I want them in? And throw a tantrum.......He had zero leverage, as we now conveniently know......

uhhhhhhh, me thinks peter king is dishonest....

Petraeus testified that the CIA draft written in response to the raid referred to militant groups Ansar al-Shariah and al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb but those names were replaced with the word "extremist" in the final draft, according to a congressional staffer. The staffer said Petraeus testified that he allowed other agencies to alter the talking points as they saw fit without asking for final review to get them out quickly.



The congressional officials weren't authorized to discuss the hearing publicly and described Petraeus' testimony to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.



Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said Petraeus explained that the CIA's draft points were sent to other intelligence agencies and to some federal agencies for review. Udall said Petraeus told them the final document was put in front of all the senior agency leaders, including Petraeus, and everyone signed off on it.



"The assessment that was publicly shared in unclassified talking points went through a process of editing," Udall said. "The extremist description was put in because in an unclassified document you want to be careful who you identify as being involved."

Petraeus: U.S. didn't reveal role of terrorists in Benghazi to avoid tipping them off - San Jose Mercury News

Precisely. It ain't rocket science...

tipping them off to what? that we knew it was a Terrorist attack? ? are you high? seriously? Like no way we'd suspect that it was AQ or an affiliate? smoke an anther bowl, please....

Didn't obama SAY, he said it was Sunday in the Rose Garden speech? Terrorists?

At the debate, remember 'read the transcript Candy'....

 

[Lakhota]

GoneBezerk, you're too foul and stupid to respond to.

 

[Lakhota]

uhhhhhhh, me thinks peter king is dishonest....

Petraeus: U.S. didn't reveal role of terrorists in Benghazi to avoid tipping them off - San Jose Mercury News

Precisely. It ain't rocket science...

tipping them off to what? that we knew it was a Terrorist attack? ? are you high? seriously?

Didn't obama SAY, he said it was Sunday in the Rose Garden speech?

At the debate, remember 'read the transcript Candy'....

Obama referred to "acts of terror" in his Rose Garden speech. He did not call Benghazi a "terrorist attack" at that time...

 

[Trajan]

again-



WHY were they taken out? Why did obama and Hillary go on for the next 12 days blaming the video? why didn't obama, in that 60 Minutes interview say it was terrorists?

 

[GoneBezerk]

Even if the dumbfuck theory some schmuck from DoS, DoD, FBI, etc.....choose one.....stuck his neck out and removed AQ information from a POTUS report....it would show Obamination has picked a bunch of morons to work in his Cabinet.

The CIA is experts on terrorism, real time intel outside the US. No other Govt agency is going to remove the CIA's assessment on TERRORISM, that is insanity to claim that.

Next you dumbfucks are going to claim the SECDEF has to get his military opinions ok'd by someone outside DoD, like say the DHS.

 

[Trajan]

Precisely. It ain't rocket science...

tipping them off to what? that we knew it was a Terrorist attack? ? are you high? seriously?

Didn't obama SAY, he said it was Sunday in the Rose Garden speech?

At the debate, remember 'read the transcript Candy'....

Obama referred to "acts of terror" in his Rose Garden speech. He did not call Benghazi a "terrorist attack"...

so he lied?


go ahead, switch up again keep digging...

 

[g5000]

Inter-Agency is code for the Govt cloud i.e White House appointees inthe Cabinet.

Oh, wow! You are really in the deep end of your own shit now!

Nobody below the White House is going to remove TERRORISM information from a report provided by the CIA, you stupid piece of shit.

It woule be like if the SECDEF gives his military opinion on a matter and you believe Joe Schmoe from the FAA steps in and removes it through the "inter-agency" process....what a fucking joke.

You have never worked a day in the Govt and never had a security clearance, shut the fuck up. If I want an opinion on trailer parks, fucking dogs, etc....then you move to the front line here.

I'm retired military, dipshit.

You are batshit insane.

No one said the White House removed the notes. You made that up.

No one said Petraeus is being blackmailed. You made that up. It is funny how you selectively believe the parts of his testimony which fit into your delusions, and replace the rest with fantasy!

No one said the notes were removed during a meeting with Rice just before she went out to speak. You made that up.


You are a conspiracy generating machine! What a pathetic sight.

.

 

[Lakhota]

Petraeus: U.S. didn't reveal role of terrorists in Benghazi to avoid tipping them off - San Jose Mercury News