thereisnospoon
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #81
yeah, if the Unions agreed to an 8% pay cut, they'd be back at work.
Until the next crisis where they'd be asked for more pay cuts and more force cuts and more salary cuts and maybe some folks get injured because they don't have enough personnel on the machines.
SO this is your logic...ZERO % is better than 92%?
Depends. Most of these guys will probably get jobs at Hostess's competitors that did all the things. Especially once their competitors buy up the factories and the brand names.
If you are the guys who bought the right to "Twinky", you'd probably want a guy whose been baking them for 20 years.
The only way to put an end to Corporate Vampires is to drive a stake through their hearts.
Yes but as most other private sector employers (93%) are non union those jobs will be hard to come by. The Hostess workers should have thought outside the box. They should have kept their jobs with the small concessions. Now there are nearly 20k people out of work. That makes NO SENSE at all.
Your union mentality is so stupid. You people are backwards. You cheer for the closing of the very business that provides the jobs. When the business closes, you then whine "what about our jobs"..
You cannot have it both ways.
This is all moot. The union fucked up and 18 thousand people no longer have a livelihood. Brilliant.
I hope all of those displaced workers DO find jobs. Outside the grasp of those stupid unions.