Unfit to lead

OK, I heard.

"Right now, doctors a lot of times are forced to make decisions based on the fee payment schedule that's out there. ... The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference. The president added: "Now, that may be the right thing to do, but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out or whether it might make more sense just to change; maybe they have allergies. Maybe they have something else that would make a difference."

There's not a thing there I disagree with. It's true.

Sorry.

Why did you not highlight...and actually seemingly ignore this part:

The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference.

Afterall, THAT is the crux of my comp[laint as it created outrage to many that was not necessary as the statement itself is not at all accurate. Pediatricians do not MAKE that decision.....EVER.
 
Last edited:
He said MAY...

Important word.

"but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out"

Even more important words.

I get the gist of what he was saying, and it wasn't just about tonsils or which exact doctor
...
It was the payment fee schedule and the way the system works right now - and more importantly, MY issue: The lack of preventative care -a sickness industry, not a wellness industry, the system writhes in now.

Edit: I note He DID NOT say pediatrician.
 
Last edited:
He said MAY...

Important word.

"but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out"

Even more important words.

I get the gist of what he was saying, and it wasn't just about tonsils or which exact doctor (yeah he messed up with that).
It was the payment fee schedule and the way the system works right now - and more importantly, MY issue: The lack of preventative care -a sickness industry, not a wellness industry, the system writhes in now.

Creating outrage for something that is not the issue is capitalizing on the naivety of the people...it was wrong and it did not at all address the real issue. Instead, it created "doubt" in people that used to trust their pediatirician.

He expanded it with the "amputation" thing...whiuch AGAIN is not the decision of a GP but ALWAYS the decision of a surgeon who will ONLY decide to do it if the GP or other specialist recommends it.

Reform healthcare? Absoilutely...it has its issues.

But to gain supoport for it by getting the more naive to hate their doctors and hate the insurance companies?

Irresponsible.

There are plenty of people that work in insurance companies that are simply doing their jobs who are now looked down upon.

Here in NY? I have seen many on the LIRR get reamed out by other passengers becuase they worked for AIG.....simply being employees....sitting in their seats shaking like leaves in a hurricane.

White cops in NYC fear for their lives more than ever ever since the "racial profiling" comment by Obama.

The man is creating a divide like we have not had for 40 years...and he simply keeps on doing it.

I had four complaints about Obama the candidate:

1) he lacked treansparency even though all he talked about was transparency...
2) he lacked anything that showed he was a centrist even though he ran on a centrist platform
3) he lacked honesty...and admitted he lied about publicx financing for political expediency
4) He seemed to be way too inexperienced to be president.

1) I have yet to see any real transparecny....all smoke and mirrors
2) He is by no means a centrist...he is left of left
3) He is by no means being honest at all times...BTW...He DID bow to the king no matter how many times he denies it
4) He has made MAJOR decisions that have backfired...a sign of political immarturity. For example...at OUR cost of 250 million we got rid of 4 GITMO detainees...who now live better than you and I.
 
He said MAY...

Important word.

"but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out"

Even more important words.

I get the gist of what he was saying, and it wasn't just about tonsils or which exact doctor (yeah he messed up with that).
It was the payment fee schedule and the way the system works right now - and more importantly, MY issue: The lack of preventative care -a sickness industry, not a wellness industry, the system writhes in now.

Creating outrage for something that is not the issue is capitalizing on the naivety of the people...it was wrong and it did not at all address the real issue. Instead, it created "doubt" in people that used to trust their pediatirician.

He expanded it with the "amputation" thing...whiuch AGAIN is not the decision of a GP but ALWAYS the decision of a surgeon who will ONLY decide to do it if the GP or other specialist recommends it.

Reform healthcare? Absoilutely...it has its issues.

But to gain supoport for it by getting the more naive to hate their doctors and hate the insurance companies?

Irresponsible.

There are plenty of people that work in insurance companies that are simply doing their jobs who are now looked down upon.

Here in NY? I have seen many on the LIRR get reamed out by other passengers becuase they worked for AIG.....simply being employees....sitting in their seats shaking like leaves in a hurricane.

White cops in NYC fear for their lives more than ever ever since the "racial profiling" comment by Obama.

The man is creating a divide like we have not had for 40 years...and he simply keeps on doing it.

I had four complaints about Obama the candidate:

1) he lacked treansparency even though all he talked about was transparency...
2) he lacked anything that showed he was a centrist even though he ran on a centrist platform
3) he lacked honesty...and admitted he lied about publicx financing for political expediency
4) He seemed to be way too inexperienced to be president.

1) I have yet to see any real transparecny....all smoke and mirrors
2) He is by no means a centrist...he is left of left
3) He is by no means being honest at all times...BTW...He DID bow to the king no matter how many times he denies it
4) He has made MAJOR decisions that have backfired...a sign of political immarturity. For example...at OUR cost of 250 million we got rid of 4 GITMO detainees...who now live better than you and I.
You have some legitimate concerns.

None of which I can change.

& Inexperienced or experienced matters less than a hill of beans. Bush and his crew were "Experienced" and they fucked this country up more than I could have ever imagined.


I guess we can just assume he can't count on your vote in the next election.

:p
 
He said MAY...

Important word.

"but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out"

Even more important words.

I get the gist of what he was saying, and it wasn't just about tonsils or which exact doctor (yeah he messed up with that).
It was the payment fee schedule and the way the system works right now - and more importantly, MY issue: The lack of preventative care -a sickness industry, not a wellness industry, the system writhes in now.

Creating outrage for something that is not the issue is capitalizing on the naivety of the people...it was wrong and it did not at all address the real issue. Instead, it created "doubt" in people that used to trust their pediatirician.

He expanded it with the "amputation" thing...whiuch AGAIN is not the decision of a GP but ALWAYS the decision of a surgeon who will ONLY decide to do it if the GP or other specialist recommends it.

Reform healthcare? Absoilutely...it has its issues.

But to gain supoport for it by getting the more naive to hate their doctors and hate the insurance companies?

Irresponsible.

There are plenty of people that work in insurance companies that are simply doing their jobs who are now looked down upon.

Here in NY? I have seen many on the LIRR get reamed out by other passengers becuase they worked for AIG.....simply being employees....sitting in their seats shaking like leaves in a hurricane.

White cops in NYC fear for their lives more than ever ever since the "racial profiling" comment by Obama.

The man is creating a divide like we have not had for 40 years...and he simply keeps on doing it.

I had four complaints about Obama the candidate:

1) he lacked treansparency even though all he talked about was transparency...
2) he lacked anything that showed he was a centrist even though he ran on a centrist platform
3) he lacked honesty...and admitted he lied about publicx financing for political expediency
4) He seemed to be way too inexperienced to be president.

1) I have yet to see any real transparecny....all smoke and mirrors
2) He is by no means a centrist...he is left of left
3) He is by no means being honest at all times...BTW...He DID bow to the king no matter how many times he denies it
4) He has made MAJOR decisions that have backfired...a sign of political immarturity. For example...at OUR cost of 250 million we got rid of 4 GITMO detainees...who now live better than you and I.
You have some legitimate concerns.

None of which I can change.

& Inexperienced or experienced matters less than a hill of beans. Bush and his crew were "Experienced" and they fucked this country up more than I could have ever imagined.


I guess we can just assume he can't count on your vote in the next election.

:p

Inexperience when there is a fillibuster proof majority in congress is a very dnagerous theing.

They are moving him around like a puppet.

No...he never had my vote based on the 4 reasons I cited.

McCain did not have my vote for other reasons.

Bush did not have my vote in 2000....but he got it in 2004...and he lost my supoport when he decided to expand government....

In 2012....we shall see who is on the ticket.....but no....Obama is exactly what I percieved him to be and he will never have my vote.
 
Inexperience when there is a fillibuster proof majority in congress is a very dnagerous theing.

They are moving him around like a puppet.

No...he never had my vote based on the 4 reasons I cited.

McCain did not have my vote for other reasons.

Bush did not have my vote in 2000....but he got it in 2004...and he lost my supoport when he decided to expand government....

In 2012....we shall see who is on the ticket.....but no....Obama is exactly what I percieved him to be and he will never have my vote.
I didn't think so o&t.

I was being Fa-She-Sus!

;P
 
We have a waiting week in Oregon, too.

That's the way it works. Wait until you apply for a cash grant from the state. You get to play some REAL games then.

New York is no different.

Dealing with unemplyment is a job in itself.

No different than the DMV....Post office......

Yup....lets give them healthcare. There's a great idea.

damn you guys are boring...

social security is administered with an approximately 4% administrative cost... I defy any private business to deliver services that inexpensively.

and health care is already govt administered vis a vis medicare/medicaid. as your folks if they feel like giving up medicare....

and if the person who wrote the OP wants to give up his unemployment insurance.... which ONLY exists because government intervened in the "private market".
 
We have a waiting week in Oregon, too.

That's the way it works. Wait until you apply for a cash grant from the state. You get to play some REAL games then.

New York is no different.

Dealing with unemplyment is a job in itself.

No different than the DMV....Post office......

Yup....lets give them healthcare. There's a great idea.

damn you guys are boring...

social security is administered with an approximately 4% administrative cost... I defy any private business to deliver services that inexpensively.

and health care is already govt administered vis a vis medicare/medicaid. as your folks if they feel like giving up medicare....

and if the person who wrote the OP wants to give up his unemployment insurance.... which ONLY exists because government intervened in the "private market".

Well...lets try to be a little accurate....

Social Security OPERATES AT A LOSS with approximately 4% administrative cost....I defy any business to be as foolish.

And yes...Medicaid and medicare are already government administered and are ALSO operating at a severe loss despite only catering to two segments of the population.

And I am curious...do you have any idea who pays for unemployment? Really...are you aware of where the money comes from?...HINT: It is NOT The taxpayer
 
Last edited:
Why don't you, instead of waiting for a bailout from the government, go get a job and stop mooching? Do anything. Get a job at fucking McDonalds if you have to.

Wait. You voted for Obama. You encouraged this kind of behavior.

What other option did I have??? Come on! Have you listened to the bitch lately about her rants that some kind of death panel is going to decide if her retarded kid should be aborted or not? This woman's a fuckin loon and one heartbeat away from being the President if she were elected! I would've voted for Putin before I voted for Palin.

Palin wasn't running for president, silly.
 
Last edited:
We have a waiting week in Oregon, too.


waiting week i can see not a waiting month
 
yes you are a totally delusional fuckstain. Take your Alzheimers pills and take your dick out of Obama's ass

Take your dick out of your eye, Elvis, and see the world your little hero left US.:eusa_liar:

Talk about delusional.

All this ass stuff from the right. Homo or homophobdick?:lol:
 
Wait. You voted for Obama. You encouraged this kind of behavior.

Show me one piece of evidence - even a teenie weenie bit - that 1) Obama encourages that behaviour 2) Anybody who voted for him does.

Take your time...:cool:

There is obviously other people that got that kind of message from Obama.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI]YouTube - Obama Is Going To Pay For My Gas And Mortgage!!![/ame]

LMFAO:clap2:
 
OK, I heard.

"Right now, doctors a lot of times are forced to make decisions based on the fee payment schedule that's out there. ... The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference. The president added: "Now, that may be the right thing to do, but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out or whether it might make more sense just to change; maybe they have allergies. Maybe they have something else that would make a difference."

There's not a thing there I disagree with. It's true.

Sorry.

Wow. So THAT'S what he said the right was going off on. It's nothing like it was hyped to be. And btw, he's dead on.

And also. Notice he didn't say the word "pediatrician".
 
OK, I heard.

"Right now, doctors a lot of times are forced to make decisions based on the fee payment schedule that's out there. ... The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference. The president added: "Now, that may be the right thing to do, but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out or whether it might make more sense just to change; maybe they have allergies. Maybe they have something else that would make a difference."

There's not a thing there I disagree with. It's true.

Sorry.

Why did you not highlight...and actually seemingly ignore this part:

The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference.

Afterall, THAT is the crux of my comp[laint as it created outrage to many that was not necessary as the statement itself is not at all accurate. Pediatricians do not MAKE that decision.....EVER.

He didn't say the word 'pediatrician'.

Also.

Peds DO make that decision. Then they consult the surgeon to do the procedure. Of course the surgeon has the final say as to whether he'll do it or not, but I bet you'd be hard pressed to find one that refused.
 
OK, I heard.

"Right now, doctors a lot of times are forced to make decisions based on the fee payment schedule that's out there. ... The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference. The president added: "Now, that may be the right thing to do, but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out or whether it might make more sense just to change; maybe they have allergies. Maybe they have something else that would make a difference."

There's not a thing there I disagree with. It's true.

Sorry.

Why did you not highlight...and actually seemingly ignore this part:

The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference.

Afterall, THAT is the crux of my comp[laint as it created outrage to many that was not necessary as the statement itself is not at all accurate. Pediatricians do not MAKE that decision.....EVER.

He didn't say the word 'pediatrician'.

Also.

Peds DO make that decision. Then they consult the surgeon to do the procedure. Of course the surgeon has the final say as to whether he'll do it or not, but I bet you'd be hard pressed to find one that refused.

If the surgeon has the final say, then it's he/she that makes the decision and not the pediatrician. Pediatricians decide whether or not to consult with a surgeon but if the surgeon deems the procedure unnecessary, then the procedure would not be done. If that's true ( which I believe it is), then who makes the decision? Not the pediatrician, just as OldandTired said.
 
OK, I heard.

"Right now, doctors a lot of times are forced to make decisions based on the fee payment schedule that's out there. ... The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'" Obama told a prime-time news conference. The president added: "Now, that may be the right thing to do, but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions just based on whether you really need your kid's tonsils out or whether it might make more sense just to change; maybe they have allergies. Maybe they have something else that would make a difference."

There's not a thing there I disagree with. It's true.

Sorry.

Wow. So THAT'S what he said the right was going off on. It's nothing like it was hyped to be. And btw, he's dead on.

And also. Notice he didn't say the word "pediatrician".

See how things can be spun? In his quote..and what "the right was upset with as well as pediatricians nationwide was what she did NOT highlight....

The doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, 'You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out,'"

And no...he did not say pediatrician.....but he DID say "your child" and usually the doctor of your child is a pediatrician.

And seeing as people get to sue for scars they get from surgery, I am sure people would sue for tonsils being taken out for no reason.....but they arent. He simply showed he is a paranoid asshole and expects the rest of us to be that way.....

ANd sorry...NO pediatrician has the right to say to ANY surgeon..."I insist you perform the surgery. The surgeon has the final; say and is based on his or her OWN diagnoisis.

Obama simply decided to play on the paranoia and naivety of the American people.

And it didnt work....so now he is trying a new tactic....Make the insurance companies the villians......

If you need to jump from tactic to tactic...maybe something is wrong with your initiative?
 

Forum List

Back
Top