Unemployment: How bad is "bad?"

Discussion in 'Economy' started by DavidS, Mar 5, 2009.

?

Unemployment: How bad is "bad?"

Poll closed Mar 7, 2009.
  1. 7.9%

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 8.0%

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 8.1%

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  4. 8.1%+

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
  1. DavidS
    Offline

    DavidS Anti-Tea Party Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,811
    Thanks Received:
    766
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New York, NY
    Ratings:
    +767
    Unemployment: How bad is "bad?"
     
  2. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    100% is very bad.

    Anything higher than that is truly catastropic because that means the Zombies are unemployed.
     
  3. xotoxi
    Offline

    xotoxi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    30,322
    Thanks Received:
    5,203
    Trophy Points:
    1,110
    Location:
    your mother
    Ratings:
    +5,492

    Actually, don't you want all the zombies to be unemployed?

    Can you imagine is zombies worked as chefs in restaurants?

    You order minestrone and you end up with rotten beef stew.
     
  4. oreo
    Offline

    oreo Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,454
    Thanks Received:
    1,960
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    rocky mountains
    Ratings:
    +4,151
    We consider 4.5% unemployment in this country "full" employment figures, meaning the economy is cooking right along.

    Right now California has over 10% unemployment & Detroit, MI is at 11.6% unemployment. That's bad.

    The last great recession during the Carter years measured 10% unemployment. We have not seen this since then. It's very worrisome. During the Great Depression of the 30's unemployment measured at a whopping 28%. Along with that add that our financial stock market is collapsing--the lowest level in 12 years. Retirements & savings are getting wiped out along with savings for the kids college educations.

    I really don't know what turns this around--but I am very skeptical that all these bail-outs & government spending is the solution.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2009
  5. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    If everyone who used to have two jobs, just to keep going, lost both jobs, would we have 200% unemployment?
     
  6. auditor0007
    Offline

    auditor0007 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    12,566
    Thanks Received:
    2,255
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Toledo, OH
    Ratings:
    +3,218
    There is no single action that will turn this around. We over-borrowed, and now we are paying the price. When I say we, I mean everyone in general, us as a society. People borrowed too much to buy the homes they live in, they borrowed too much to fill those homes with furniture and nice toys, they borrowed too much for the cars they drive in. At the same time, our government also borrowed too much.

    The economy will turn around, but it's going to take at least five years, maybe ten. That doesn't mean it will continue to collapse, but it is going to level off. This is the great L curve recession versus the V or U. Many people will lose everything they have. The rest will hang on tight and will pay down their debt as they begin to save money. No one will be spending extra money. As savings rates increase and people actually begin to have money saved, then they will feel more comfortable spending that money. When we reach that point, then we will see real growth in the economy again, but not until then.

    What bothers me is that is what our government should be doing also, biting the bullet by cutting spending. But instead, they are taking the opposite route, borrowing even more, which is why we are here in the first place. This will most likely help out a bit in the short term, but it will also prolong any real recovery. This is why I worry that we may be looking at ten years of minimal growth.
     
  7. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,299
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,306
    I was going to say 8.05%, but you don't have it in your poll.
     
  8. auditor0007
    Offline

    auditor0007 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    12,566
    Thanks Received:
    2,255
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Toledo, OH
    Ratings:
    +3,218
    Semantics
     
  9. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,299
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,306
    It has nothing to do with antivirus software.
     
  10. wimpy77
    Offline

    wimpy77 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    591
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +10
    in this current economy anything over 10% i think is bad. one guy on cnbc said 12% unemployment now is the eqivalent of maybe 20% back in the 30's.
     

Share This Page