Underwear Bomber Patsy Faces Life Sentence Today

Robodoon

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2012
1,034
113
48
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the disheveled Nigerian who was put on a Christmas Day Delta flight out of Amsterdam by a well-dressed intelligence operative, will be sentenced in U.S. District Court in Detroit today.

Abdulmutallab faces consecutive life terms for setting his underwear on fire.

The prosecution has portrayed him as “an unrepentant would-be mass murderer, who views his crimes as divinely inspired and blessed, and who views himself as under a continuing obligation to carry out such crimes.”

His counsel, Detroit criminal defense attorney Anthony Chambers, says a mandatory life sentence is cruel and unusual punishment, given the fact that Abdulmutallab was incapable of bombing Delta Flight 253.

A CBC documentary that aired in 2010 revealed that not only would Abdulmutallab’s PETN bomb been difficult to ignite, but the blast, if successful, would not have been powerful enough to penetrate the 5 mm thick aluminum alloy skin of the aircraft and compromise its structural integrity.

The case against Abdulmutallab was questionable from the outset, historian Webster Tarpley noted in February, 2010.

“The Detroit Christmas bomber was deliberately and intentionally allowed to keep his US entry visa as the result of a national security override issued by an as yet unknown US intelligence or law-enforcement agency with the goal of blocking the State Department’s planned revocation of that visa,”

Continued

Comment: Another False flag by our intel services to bring in police state in the USA. After this false flag, we got the scanners introduced which were already ordered up. they just needed another exuse to lock us down more
 
According to the people that interviewed him, he had an unshakable devotion to jihad and an unmovable loyalty to Al Quaeda.

Of more importance is that he was able to get on the plane despite his father's warning telephone call. He was not stopped by security, but by an alert crew. Security was not about to stop a black man from boarding this plane. Nor were they interested in stopping a muslim, even one that came with ample warning.

Cause for concern? You bet.
 
Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.
Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.
Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.
Hermann Göring - Wikiquote
 
The ABC Nightly News of February 16th, 2012 gave a version of the story that:

1. fails to mention that this was a possible false flag, even though all evidence indicates this could be a real possibility.

2. totally neglects to even mention Kurt Haskell or what he claims to have witnessed or that he claims he tried to tell the FBI his story but they were uninterested.

3. forgets to mention that Dutch Authorities admit that Umar boarded with assistance without proper passport/ID.

4. won’t talk about video footage from the Amsterdam Airport that would prove what Kurt witnessed…but is unavailable.

5. admits that jurors were shown a test where an explosive was detonated as a sample of what would have happened if the bomb had worked and yet this is irrelevant considering the government experts claimed early on the bomb was poorly built and could never have detonated, again another fact that was omitted.

Kurt’s testimony tells a whole different story, in it he points out that:

1. “While I sat there, I witnessed Umar dressed in jeans and a white t-shirt, being escorted around security by a man in a tan suit who spoke perfect American English and who aided Umar in boarding without a passport. The airline gate worker initially refused Umar boarding until the man in the tan suit intervened”
:eusa_whistle:
Sin Of Omission: Why Is ABC News Omitting Critical Details of the Underwear Bomber Case? :
 

Forum List

Back
Top