Understanding what a real job is and where it comes from:

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Republican supply-siders supply the goods and services that create jobs.

Imagine you're back in the stone age, everyone is starving to death, and you're waiting for liberal consumers to create jobs!! How dumb is that???

Real jobs come only after Republicans invent or supply things that improve the standard of living of consumers.

The world sat still for centuries until Republican supply siders became productive. Now, as then, we need to encourage them in every way possible and for exactly the same reasons!

 

[jillian]

Republican supply-siders supply the goods and services that create jobs.

Imagine you're back in the stone age, everyone is starving to death, and you're waiting for liberal consumers to create jobs!! How dumb is that???

Real jobs come only after Republicans invent or supply things that improve the standard of living of consumers.

The world sat still for centuries until Republican supply siders became productive. Now, as then, we need to encourage them in every way possible and for exactly the same reasons!

Supply side is a proven failure. If people have no money for goods, there are no jobs.

And while a reference to the stone age sounds pithy, it's particularly inparis and simplistic

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Supply side is a proven failure. If people have no money for goods, there are no jobs.

way way too stupid but perfectly liberal. If money was the problem the government could just print all it wanted!!!

If that leaves you dumbfounded that means you are in Economics kindergarten. Sorry.

 

[ccravens]

Republican supply-siders supply the goods and services that create jobs.

Imagine you're back in the stone age, everyone is starving to death, and you're waiting for liberal consumers to create jobs!! How dumb is that???

Real jobs come only after Republicans invent or supply things that improve the standard of living of consumers.

The world sat still for centuries until Republican supply siders became productive. Now, as then, we need to encourage them in every way possible and for exactly the same reasons!

Supply side is a proven failure. If people have no money for goods, there are no jobs.

And while a reference to the stone age sounds pithy, it's particularly inparis and simplistic

Supply-side is a proven failure?

Please tell us how. And not just "because I say so."


We're waiting.

 

[Truthmatters]

No one sells a fucking thing if there is no buyer

 

[Truthmatters]

Commerse is consumer driven you brain dead pablum lappers

 

[Truthmatters]

Poor special ed

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

No one sells a fucking thing if there is no buyer

no one had a thing to buy for centuries before Republican supply-siders came along and so buyers or consumers slowly starved to death in the millions.

The gift of life came from Republican supply-siders!

 

[Truthmatters]

Your really special Ed

 

[jillian]

Supply side is a proven failure. If people have no money for goods, there are no jobs.

way way too stupid but perfectly liberal. If money was the problem the government could just print all it wanted!!!

If that leaves you dumbfounded that means you are in Economics kindergarten. Sorry.

I'm always bemused when someone as ignorant as you tries to insult *my* intelligence. You spew rightwingnut dogma and act as if it is fact.

Reality, everytine supply side has been pursued, we've been tossed into recession.

Poor baby

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Supply side is a proven failure. If people have no money for goods, there are no jobs.

way way too stupid but perfectly liberal. If money was the problem the government could just print all it wanted!!!

If that leaves you dumbfounded that means you are in Economics kindergarten. Sorry.

I'm always bemused when someone as ignorant as you tries to insult *my* intelligence. You spew rightwingnut dogma and act as if it is fact.

Reality, everytine supply side has been pursued, we've been tossed into recession.

Poor baby

you said consumers needed money???? I told you government can print it. Then you changed the subject??

Why does that tell you about the liberal IQ and character!!

See why we have to be 100% sure that liberalism is pure ignorance??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Commerse is consumer driven you brain dead pablum lappers

dear it wasn't for centuries until Republican supply siders invented things to end en masse starvation

 

[ccravens]

Supply side is a proven failure. If people have no money for goods, there are no jobs.

way way too stupid but perfectly liberal. If money was the problem the government could just print all it wanted!!!

If that leaves you dumbfounded that means you are in Economics kindergarten. Sorry.

I'm always bemused when someone as ignorant as you tries to insult *my* intelligence. You spew rightwingnut dogma and act as if it is fact.

Reality, everytine supply side has been pursued, we've been tossed into recession.

Poor baby

You want people to think of YOU as intellectual?

I asked you to prove your statement, and not "just because you say so."

So what do you do to prove your ignorant ideologically-driven statement?

You say "because I said so." Here's your statement of proof:

"Reality [sic], everytine [sic] supply side has been pursued, we've been tossed into recession."

So we're to believe it because you said so.



Deep. Real deep.

Intellectual. Real intellectual.

 

[Avorysuds]

Poor special ed

TM is talking to her imaginary class mates again... TM never got an education so she pretends she went to school, lol.

 

[Avorysuds]

No one sells a fucking thing if there is no buyer

No one buys anything if there is no seller either... Or can you not agree with that concept due to your head being filled with stirred shit?

That is why someone makes a product and sells it and we have the free markets to decide what is a viable product. The idea that gains enough customers is the one that later is able to hire someone(s) to help them...

Think of this in terms before people had money and did things by trade, what you couldn't do you traded your services for... If your service gained demand usually done by either supply a necessity or quality and useful items, then you might need help making your product, even if that product was picking berries.

It’s quite simple really, that’s why you struggle with the concept TM.

If someone produces berries that are fresh and taste good because they were picked with care and when they are ripe, they gain the most customers. The customers could have lived without berries, but they like the berries… So much so that the “owner” of the berry picking company hires an employee or 50.

Do you see how it works TM? The berries where always there, maybe just too far for people to justify the 2 day hike to get to them… So someone made a business and jobs by collecting berries and bringing them to the masses.

 

[Avorysuds]

I figured because you’re like that ignorant child in the educational cartoon who asks questions in answer form kinda like Jeopardy, only to have the narrator say “Close! But here is where you went wrong Truthmatters!”

So using the scenario where berries were a 2 days hike away from people living in a time without money and thus not many other technological advances I’ll show another big step that proves why you’re wrong and also one of the boards greatest idiots.

So the guy that started a company by picking berries that are a 2 day hike away from the large tribe he lives in is doing well… He has hired over 15 employees that he pays with other goods that he makes off trades for his berries.

At some point they hit their limit on the amount of berries they can pick VS how many berries the plants can provide =( … very sad. But years go by and that’s just the way it goes, they can only forage so many berries. /booface…

One of the employee’s notices that if she plants seeds and works out a flat area of land next to a source of water that she can produce far more berries in a shorter amount of time than having people forage through the forest looking for this random berry plant! This only works in the immediate area due to the soil and climate. Farming is born!!!! LEVEL UP!!!!

This is where you say something stupid like “Because there was demand for farming???!” and the narrator says “ Haha, shut it idiot child and watch as magic that is beyond you tiny mind takes place!”

The lady decides she will take her saved profits (capital) from picking berries for years and invest in the resources needed to build her farm. For the most part no one has any clue what she woman is up to seeing as no farms have ever existed for people to demand a product from. So there is no demand but there is an idea!!!!

Only 3 years later the owner of the farm is producing berries at a vastly increased rate compared to the man who started his business of collecting berries and moving them into town. Oddly the 2 find if they work together instead against each other, that the lady can hire people to work on the farm and even expand it as demand grows while the man shifts his business into shipping the product from the farm to the tribe’s people rather than forging for the product.

How was this all possible TM? I mean, people had no idea that a shipping company or a farming company could improve their life so much and yet the demand appeared only after the product was mad…. How…. Is…. That…. Possible?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

No one sells a fucking thing if there is no buyer

No one buys anything if there is no seller either... Or can you not agree with that concept due to your head being filled with stirred shit?

That is why someone makes a product and sells it and we have the free markets to decide what is a viable product. The idea that gains enough customers is the one that later is able to hire someone(s) to help them...

Think of this in terms before people had money and did things by trade, what you couldn't do you traded your services for... If your service gained demand usually done by either supply a necessity or quality and useful items, then you might need help making your product, even if that product was picking berries.

It’s quite simple really, that’s why you struggle with the concept TM.

If someone produces berries that are fresh and taste good because they were picked with care and when they are ripe, they gain the most customers. The customers could have lived without berries, but they like the berries… So much so that the “owner” of the berry picking company hires an employee or 50.

Do you see how it works TM? The berries where always there, maybe just too far for people to justify the 2 day hike to get to them… So someone made a business and jobs by collecting berries and bringing them to the masses.

a liberal wants to give consumers credit for wanting to consume food clothing and shelter when consumers did without for centuries until Republican supply-siders came along.

Imagine a society that encourages the most natural and common activity,ie., wanting food, clothing, and shelter, and discourages the Republican supply-sider gift of life.

Its too stupid to imagine but that is honestly what liberals do.
They bite the hand that feeds them but lack the IQ to know it!

 

[Avorysuds]

No one sells a fucking thing if there is no buyer

No one buys anything if there is no seller either... Or can you not agree with that concept due to your head being filled with stirred shit?

That is why someone makes a product and sells it and we have the free markets to decide what is a viable product. The idea that gains enough customers is the one that later is able to hire someone(s) to help them...

Think of this in terms before people had money and did things by trade, what you couldn't do you traded your services for... If your service gained demand usually done by either supply a necessity or quality and useful items, then you might need help making your product, even if that product was picking berries.

It’s quite simple really, that’s why you struggle with the concept TM.

If someone produces berries that are fresh and taste good because they were picked with care and when they are ripe, they gain the most customers. The customers could have lived without berries, but they like the berries… So much so that the “owner” of the berry picking company hires an employee or 50.

Do you see how it works TM? The berries where always there, maybe just too far for people to justify the 2 day hike to get to them… So someone made a business and jobs by collecting berries and bringing them to the masses.

a liberal wants to give consumers credit for wanting to consume food clothing and shelter when consumers did without for centuries until Republican supply-siders came along.

Imagine a society that encourages the most natural and common activity,ie., wanting food, clothing, and shelter, and discourages the Republican supply-sider gift of life.

Its too stupid to imagine but that is honestly what liberals do.
They bite the hand that feeds them but lack the IQ to know it!

While I understand that usually it is (on these boards at least) liberals that disagree with the theory of supply side, if you want to reach people you might not want to generalize them as liberals. Many people don't understand these concepts oddly. And yes it's odd seeing as it's about as proven as gravity and evolution.

One last point, feel free to make fun of TM all you like, she is not a liberal, she is an Obama-bot… there is in fact a big difference as one can think for themself.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

you might not want to generalize them as liberals. Many people don't understand these concepts oddly.

yes it is so very odd. Its like some people have the necessary part of the brain for it and some just don't. Its not that its complex, it just seems to require a special part of the brain that you got or not.

And yes it's odd seeing as it's about as proven as gravity and evolution.

the liberal brain is a mystery! and I guess some conservative brains too.

One last point, feel free to make fun of TM all you like, she is not a liberal, she is an Obama-bot… there is in fact a big difference as one can think for themself.

yes I've noticed. Most liberals have a Nazi-like self-assurance and a Nazi like lack of interest in demonstrating they are right about anything. They are, really, bigots,i.e., they feel deeply that they are morally superior but have no reasons whatsoever.

Our Constitution was designed to give us intelligent government, so why are liberals allowed to vote when the Constitution in effect made liberals illegal on two counts: 1) they can't pass a political IQ test, 2) their big government philosophy, if you can call it that, is opposed to the most basic principle of the Constitution.