Under new law, military kids get sex assault protections

[basquebromance]

Under new law, military kids get sex assault protections

New law requires Defense Department to improve the way it responds to child-on-child sexual assault on military bases in the wake of new revelations that child offenders are rarely held accountable and victims often receive no help.

 

[rightwinger]

Probably the same code of silence as in the military

 

[whitehall]

Why doesn't the republican majority and President Trump get a pat on the back for addressing a problem that has been festering for decades? Where were they when Barry Hussein was president?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Why doesn't the republican majority and President Trump get a pat on the back for addressing a problem that has been festering for decades? Where were they when Barry Hussein was president?

Trump had nothing to do with it. Anymore than Obama did. It was all of the Congress Critters requiring it. It was non political and non partisan. So stop this BS and put the kudos where it belongs and that is on all of Congress.

 

[whitehall]

Why doesn't the republican majority and President Trump get a pat on the back for addressing a problem that has been festering for decades? Where were they when Barry Hussein was president?

Trump had nothing to do with it. Anymore than Obama did. It was all of the Congress Critters requiring it. It was non political and non partisan. So stop this BS and put the kudos where it belongs and that is on all of Congress.

Trump signed it into freaking law. That means he had a lot to do with it. The only input the Hussein administration had with the U.S. Military was to claim that a traitor was a hero and force the Military to accept freakazoid transgenders who have to take medication for the rest of their lives. It may have been non political and non partisan but it was never addressed during the Obama or the Bush administration or Clinton and it happened on Trump's watch. That makes it Trump's law.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Why doesn't the republican majority and President Trump get a pat on the back for addressing a problem that has been festering for decades? Where were they when Barry Hussein was president?

Trump had nothing to do with it. Anymore than Obama did. It was all of the Congress Critters requiring it. It was non political and non partisan. So stop this BS and put the kudos where it belongs and that is on all of Congress.

Trump signed it into freaking law. That means he had a lot to do with it. The only input the Hussein administration had with the U.S. Military was to claim that a traitor was a hero and force the Military to accept freakazoid transgenders who have to take medication for the rest of their lives. It may have been non political and non partisan but it was never addressed during the Obama or the Bush administration or Clinton and it happened on Trump's watch. That makes it Trump's law.

It was never done by Congress. It was part of the total package. Trump had nothing to do with it at all. It's not Trumps law. Or course, the sun coming up in the morning is also attributed to Trump as well.

 

[whitehall]

Why doesn't the republican majority and President Trump get a pat on the back for addressing a problem that has been festering for decades? Where were they when Barry Hussein was president?

Trump had nothing to do with it. Anymore than Obama did. It was all of the Congress Critters requiring it. It was non political and non partisan. So stop this BS and put the kudos where it belongs and that is on all of Congress.

Trump signed it into freaking law. That means he had a lot to do with it. The only input the Hussein administration had with the U.S. Military was to claim that a traitor was a hero and force the Military to accept freakazoid transgenders who have to take medication for the rest of their lives. It may have been non political and non partisan but it was never addressed during the Obama or the Bush administration or Clinton and it happened on Trump's watch. That makes it Trump's law.

It was never done by Congress. It was part of the total package. Trump had nothing to do with it at all. It's not Trumps law. Or course, the sun coming up in the morning is also attributed to Trump as well.

Part of the package? It could have been "part of the package" ten years ago but the only thing the Hussein administration worried about is forcing the military to accept freakazoid transexuals. It was "in the package" because the President and republican congressional members who crafted the "package" wanted it to be.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Why doesn't the republican majority and President Trump get a pat on the back for addressing a problem that has been festering for decades? Where were they when Barry Hussein was president?

Trump had nothing to do with it. Anymore than Obama did. It was all of the Congress Critters requiring it. It was non political and non partisan. So stop this BS and put the kudos where it belongs and that is on all of Congress.

Trump signed it into freaking law. That means he had a lot to do with it. The only input the Hussein administration had with the U.S. Military was to claim that a traitor was a hero and force the Military to accept freakazoid transgenders who have to take medication for the rest of their lives. It may have been non political and non partisan but it was never addressed during the Obama or the Bush administration or Clinton and it happened on Trump's watch. That makes it Trump's law.

It was never done by Congress. It was part of the total package. Trump had nothing to do with it at all. It's not Trumps law. Or course, the sun coming up in the morning is also attributed to Trump as well.

Part of the package? It could have been "part of the package" ten years ago but the only thing the Hussein administration worried about is forcing the military to accept freakazoid transexuals. It was "in the package" because the President and republican congressional members who crafted the "package" wanted it to be.

It should have been included from the very beginning when they allowed the Military to have Families.

 

[whitehall]

Why doesn't the republican majority and President Trump get a pat on the back for addressing a problem that has been festering for decades? Where were they when Barry Hussein was president?

Trump had nothing to do with it. Anymore than Obama did. It was all of the Congress Critters requiring it. It was non political and non partisan. So stop this BS and put the kudos where it belongs and that is on all of Congress.

Trump signed it into freaking law. That means he had a lot to do with it. The only input the Hussein administration had with the U.S. Military was to claim that a traitor was a hero and force the Military to accept freakazoid transgenders who have to take medication for the rest of their lives. It may have been non political and non partisan but it was never addressed during the Obama or the Bush administration or Clinton and it happened on Trump's watch. That makes it Trump's law.

It was never done by Congress. It was part of the total package. Trump had nothing to do with it at all. It's not Trumps law. Or course, the sun coming up in the morning is also attributed to Trump as well.

Part of the package? It could have been "part of the package" ten years ago but the only thing the Hussein administration worried about is forcing the military to accept freakazoid transexuals. It was "in the package" because the President and republican congressional members who crafted the "package" wanted it to be.

It should have been included from the very beginning when they allowed the Military to have Families.

Come on lefties. A liberal congressman named Boland inserted an amendment in a Military appropriations bill that nobody noticed at the time until Reagan tried to prevent Communist infiltration into Central America. It's clear that political amendments in a military appropriations bill are intended to cause a change in the way the Military does business. The only input the Obama administration had with the Military was to force the Army to accept freakazoid recruits who couldn't decide which sex they wanted to be affiliated with. It's a crazy notion but indicative of the way the democrat party visualizes the military while there were monsters who were molesting children. You have to pat the majority republicans and the Trump administration on the back for having the courage to address the issue that was ignored by previous administrations or you can remain angry and incoherent.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Trump had nothing to do with it. Anymore than Obama did. It was all of the Congress Critters requiring it. It was non political and non partisan. So stop this BS and put the kudos where it belongs and that is on all of Congress.

Trump signed it into freaking law. That means he had a lot to do with it. The only input the Hussein administration had with the U.S. Military was to claim that a traitor was a hero and force the Military to accept freakazoid transgenders who have to take medication for the rest of their lives. It may have been non political and non partisan but it was never addressed during the Obama or the Bush administration or Clinton and it happened on Trump's watch. That makes it Trump's law.

It was never done by Congress. It was part of the total package. Trump had nothing to do with it at all. It's not Trumps law. Or course, the sun coming up in the morning is also attributed to Trump as well.

Part of the package? It could have been "part of the package" ten years ago but the only thing the Hussein administration worried about is forcing the military to accept freakazoid transexuals. It was "in the package" because the President and republican congressional members who crafted the "package" wanted it to be.

It should have been included from the very beginning when they allowed the Military to have Families.

Come on lefties. A liberal congressman named Boland inserted an amendment in a Military appropriations bill that nobody noticed at the time until Reagan tried to prevent Communist infiltration into Central America. It's clear that political amendments in a military appropriations bill are intended to cause a change in the way the Military does business. The only input the Obama administration had with the Military was to force the Army to accept freakazoid recruits who couldn't decide which sex they wanted to be affiliated with. It's a crazy notion but indicative of the way the democrat party visualizes the military while there were monsters who were molesting children. You have to pat the majority republicans and the Trump administration on the back for having the courage to address the issue that was ignored by previous administrations or you can remain angry and incoherent.

Are you trying to tell me that the Donald actually read the thing? When? Between tweets? Between the 8th and the 9th hole?