Unanswered, you can go no further

[Montrovant]

On 911 hours after the Twin Towers collapsed Building Seven collapsed. The NIST charged with the investigation (even though it is not an investigatory body) finally admitted that yes indeed the building fell at free fall acceleration for the first 2 plus seconds. This means that there was ZERO resistance to collapse, which means that 400 structural steel connections failed simultaneously every second.

The NIST blamed "normal office fires". There have been many skyscraper fires, and many which burned longer and were far more involved. None of those previous fires have ever produced total and complete collapse in mere seconds. Most did not induce any collapse at all. The Windsor Hotel in Madrid Spain burned for nearly 24 hours, virtually gutting the entire structure. In spite of that the structural frame did not collapse save for a limited area which was at the top of the hottest part of the fire. As one would expect the small amount of collapse was slow with structural members showing deformation and uneven failure.

Building Seven if the proof positive of controlled demolition and that the "Official Conspiracy Theory" is a lie. This fact alone is enough to open a real investigation. If you consider your self a patriot you should support the prosecution of the greatest crime in our history. No other evidence is needed to start the investigation for if this evidence goes unanswered then we can go no further. All other parts of the "Official Conspiracy Theory" fall apart.

I submit to this forum that the fall of the towers + 7 had to have been controlled demolition, not to mention the fact that all 4 airliners were obviously bogus.
9/11/2001 = THE BIG LIE! WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Obviously. Why believe that thousands of eye witnesses and multiple videos from different sources which all indicate planes are correct, when you can just make claims without any evidence to back them?

 

[n0spam4me]

thousands of eye witnesses

Please be so kind as to bring fourth documentation of these "THOUSANDS" of eye witnesses(?) and exactly what sort of statements have they recorded on this subject?

multiple videos from different sources which all indicate planes are correct

So you buy it, that is the Michael Hezarkhani Video and the Evan Fairbanks videos both show completely normal images of what could be expected of an airliner crashing into a wall? Remember, commercial airliners are not designed to be missiles and can not be expected to perform as missiles.