Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
“I look forward to a thorough investigation by the Israeli Defense Forces of this and other incidents in which UN facilities sustained hits and many innocent people were killed,” he said. “I am planning to move forward with an independent Board of Inquiry to look into the most serious of those cases, as well as instances in which weaponry was found on UN premises.”
In his meeting on Monday with Ya’alon, Ban confirmed his intention to establish a board of inquiry, and welcomed Israel’s support in bringing reconstruction materials into Gaza. Dujarric did not have any comment on assertions by Hamas that materials now coming into Gaza under a UN mechanism will be used for rebuilding the destroyed tunnels into Israel.
“I look forward to a thorough investigation by the Israeli Defense Forces of this and other incidents in which UN facilities sustained hits and many innocent people were killed,” he said. “I am planning to move forward with an independent Board of Inquiry to look into the most serious of those cases, as well as instances in which weaponry was found on UN premises.”
UN's Ban speaks in New York to the security council. And yeah for you pali's he is mostly concerned with the destruction of his precious UN facilities and any mention of inquiry into the illegal storage of weapons at UN sites was actually just lip service.
What a cull.
Further into the article:
In his meeting on Monday with Ya’alon, Ban confirmed his intention to establish a board of inquiry, and welcomed Israel’s support in bringing reconstruction materials into Gaza. Dujarric did not have any comment on assertions by Hamas that materials now coming into Gaza under a UN mechanism will be used for rebuilding the destroyed tunnels into Israel.
Hehehe, of course no comment. It seems as though Hamas and the UN are bed fellows.
Link: UN s Ban vows inquiry into weapons found at UN sites during Gaza war
(COMMENT)In a related development, the united consortium of foxes has vowed to investigate the mysterious disappearance of the laying hens in Farmer Ted's chicken coop, vowing to leave no nest unturned until they find the culprit.
Why can't Hamas have weapons?“I look forward to a thorough investigation by the Israeli Defense Forces of this and other incidents in which UN facilities sustained hits and many innocent people were killed,” he said. “I am planning to move forward with an independent Board of Inquiry to look into the most serious of those cases, as well as instances in which weaponry was found on UN premises.”
UN's Ban speaks in New York to the security council. And yeah for you pali's he is mostly concerned with the destruction of his precious UN facilities and any mention of inquiry into the illegal storage of weapons at UN sites was actually just lip service.
What a cull.
Further into the article:
In his meeting on Monday with Ya’alon, Ban confirmed his intention to establish a board of inquiry, and welcomed Israel’s support in bringing reconstruction materials into Gaza. Dujarric did not have any comment on assertions by Hamas that materials now coming into Gaza under a UN mechanism will be used for rebuilding the destroyed tunnels into Israel.
Hehehe, of course no comment. It seems as though Hamas and the UN are bed fellows.
Link: UN s Ban vows inquiry into weapons found at UN sites during Gaza war
(COMMENT)Why can't Hamas have weapons?
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
In a related development, the united consortium of foxes has vowed to investigate the mysterious disappearance of the laying hens in Farmer Ted's chicken coop, vowing to leave no nest unturned until they find the culprit.
Resistance to a belligerent occupation, is not aggression.Billo_Really, et al,
In any civilized country in the world, you will almost find (near universally) that they are all concerned and have laws pertaining to the use of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the furtherance of peace and stability. This is not a policy shared by the Palestinians.
(COMMENT)Why can't Hamas have weapons?
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
The Palestinians, in fact all people, have the right of self-defense. But no one can claim the right of aggression. In the case of the Palestinians, they have consistently initiated hostilities in the name of liberating Palestine from Israeli Occupation. The Hostile Arab Palestinian have a an established policy to eliminate the Israeli State.
Reaffirms its Resolution 1373 (2001) and in particular its decisions that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts and refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists;
The events that fomented and instigated Operation Protective Edge are aggressive actions, with the Palestinians as the aggressor.
The appropriate action, in the face of an aggressor with the well established past history of criminal and terrorist behaviors is:
The first use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression [Article 2. A/RES/3314(XXIX)] although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter.
Measures to eliminate international terrorism (A/RES/46/51) Calls upon all States to fulfill their obligations under international law to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in other States, or acquiescing in or encouraging activities within their territory directed towards the commission of such acts;
The Palestinians instigated the assault on Israel, using weapons in a matter inconsistent with "self-defense."
Most Respectfully,
R
Defending ones country from thousands of missiles rockets and mortars to include blowing up the launch sites no matter where located is the duty and responsibility of any Country. Further Hamas illegally with the cooperation of the UN stored said missiles and rockets in UN buildings.Resistance to a belligerent occupation, is not aggression.Billo_Really, et al,
In any civilized country in the world, you will almost find (near universally) that they are all concerned and have laws pertaining to the use of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the furtherance of peace and stability. This is not a policy shared by the Palestinians.
(COMMENT)Why can't Hamas have weapons?
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
The Palestinians, in fact all people, have the right of self-defense. But no one can claim the right of aggression. In the case of the Palestinians, they have consistently initiated hostilities in the name of liberating Palestine from Israeli Occupation. The Hostile Arab Palestinian have a an established policy to eliminate the Israeli State.
Reaffirms its Resolution 1373 (2001) and in particular its decisions that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts and refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists;
The events that fomented and instigated Operation Protective Edge are aggressive actions, with the Palestinians as the aggressor.
The appropriate action, in the face of an aggressor with the well established past history of criminal and terrorist behaviors is:
The first use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression [Article 2. A/RES/3314(XXIX)] although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter.
Measures to eliminate international terrorism (A/RES/46/51) Calls upon all States to fulfill their obligations under international law to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in other States, or acquiescing in or encouraging activities within their territory directed towards the commission of such acts;
The Palestinians instigated the assault on Israel, using weapons in a matter inconsistent with "self-defense."
Most Respectfully,
R
Maintaining a belligerent occupation of land that isn't yours for the last 47 fucking years is the reason they are getting rockets. End the occupation and you end the rocket attacks.Defending ones country from thousands of missiles rockets and mortars to include blowing up the launch sites no matter where located is the duty and responsibility of any Country. Further Hamas illegally with the cooperation of the UN stored said missiles and rockets in UN buildings.
Defending ones country from thousands of missiles rockets and mortars to include blowing up the launch sites no matter where located is the duty and responsibility of any Country. Further Hamas illegally with the cooperation of the UN stored said missiles and rockets in UN buildings.
Maintaining a belligerent occupation of land that isn't yours for the last 47 fucking years is the reason they are getting rockets. End the occupation and you end the rocket attacks.
Billo_Really, et al,
In any civilized country in the world, you will almost find (near universally) that they are all concerned and have laws pertaining to the use of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the furtherance of peace and stability. This is not a policy shared by the Palestinians.
(COMMENT)Why can't Hamas have weapons?
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
The Palestinians, in fact all people, have the right of self-defense. But no one can claim the right of aggression. In the case of the Palestinians, they have consistently initiated hostilities in the name of liberating Palestine from Israeli Occupation. The Hostile Arab Palestinian have a an established policy to eliminate the Israeli State.
Reaffirms its Resolution 1373 (2001) and in particular its decisions that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts and refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists;
The events that fomented and instigated Operation Protective Edge are aggressive actions, with the Palestinians as the aggressor.
The appropriate action, in the face of an aggressor with the well established past history of criminal and terrorist behaviors is:
The first use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression [Article 2. A/RES/3314(XXIX)] although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter.
Measures to eliminate international terrorism (A/RES/46/51) Calls upon all States to fulfill their obligations under international law to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in other States, or acquiescing in or encouraging activities within their territory directed towards the commission of such acts;
The Palestinians instigated the assault on Israel, using weapons in a matter inconsistent with "self-defense."
Most Respectfully,
R
Why can't Hamas have weapons?“I look forward to a thorough investigation by the Israeli Defense Forces of this and other incidents in which UN facilities sustained hits and many innocent people were killed,” he said. “I am planning to move forward with an independent Board of Inquiry to look into the most serious of those cases, as well as instances in which weaponry was found on UN premises.”
UN's Ban speaks in New York to the security council. And yeah for you pali's he is mostly concerned with the destruction of his precious UN facilities and any mention of inquiry into the illegal storage of weapons at UN sites was actually just lip service.
What a cull.
Further into the article:
In his meeting on Monday with Ya’alon, Ban confirmed his intention to establish a board of inquiry, and welcomed Israel’s support in bringing reconstruction materials into Gaza. Dujarric did not have any comment on assertions by Hamas that materials now coming into Gaza under a UN mechanism will be used for rebuilding the destroyed tunnels into Israel.
Hehehe, of course no comment. It seems as though Hamas and the UN are bed fellows.
Link: UN s Ban vows inquiry into weapons found at UN sites during Gaza war
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
“I look forward to a thorough investigation by the Israeli Defense Forces of this and other incidents in which UN facilities sustained hits and many innocent people were killed,” he said. “I am planning to move forward with an independent Board of Inquiry to look into the most serious of those cases, as well as instances in which weaponry was found on UN premises.”
UN's Ban speaks in New York to the security council. And yeah for you pali's he is mostly concerned with the destruction of his precious UN facilities and any mention of inquiry into the illegal storage of weapons at UN sites was actually just lip service.
What a cull.
Further into the article:
In his meeting on Monday with Ya’alon, Ban confirmed his intention to establish a board of inquiry, and welcomed Israel’s support in bringing reconstruction materials into Gaza. Dujarric did not have any comment on assertions by Hamas that materials now coming into Gaza under a UN mechanism will be used for rebuilding the destroyed tunnels into Israel.
Hehehe, of course no comment. It seems as though Hamas and the UN are bed fellows.
Link: UN s Ban vows inquiry into weapons found at UN sites during Gaza war
I hope he does make a full inquiry, also I do agree the materials and money needs to be spent on homes and infrastructure, and that needs to be monitored closely. I'm sure the donors are getting tired of donating to the destruction of Gaza by the Israelites though.
The UN and Hamas are not bedfellows . He is just be fair and practical.
Resistance to a belligerent occupation, is not aggression.Billo_Really, et al,
In any civilized country in the world, you will almost find (near universally) that they are all concerned and have laws pertaining to the use of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the furtherance of peace and stability. This is not a policy shared by the Palestinians.
(COMMENT)Why can't Hamas have weapons?
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
The Palestinians, in fact all people, have the right of self-defense. But no one can claim the right of aggression. In the case of the Palestinians, they have consistently initiated hostilities in the name of liberating Palestine from Israeli Occupation. The Hostile Arab Palestinian have a an established policy to eliminate the Israeli State.
Reaffirms its Resolution 1373 (2001) and in particular its decisions that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts and refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists;
The events that fomented and instigated Operation Protective Edge are aggressive actions, with the Palestinians as the aggressor.
The appropriate action, in the face of an aggressor with the well established past history of criminal and terrorist behaviors is:
The first use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression [Article 2. A/RES/3314(XXIX)] although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter.
Measures to eliminate international terrorism (A/RES/46/51) Calls upon all States to fulfill their obligations under international law to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in other States, or acquiescing in or encouraging activities within their territory directed towards the commission of such acts;
The Palestinians instigated the assault on Israel, using weapons in a matter inconsistent with "self-defense."
Most Respectfully,
R
Why can't Hamas have weapons?“I look forward to a thorough investigation by the Israeli Defense Forces of this and other incidents in which UN facilities sustained hits and many innocent people were killed,” he said. “I am planning to move forward with an independent Board of Inquiry to look into the most serious of those cases, as well as instances in which weaponry was found on UN premises.”
UN's Ban speaks in New York to the security council. And yeah for you pali's he is mostly concerned with the destruction of his precious UN facilities and any mention of inquiry into the illegal storage of weapons at UN sites was actually just lip service.
What a cull.
Further into the article:
In his meeting on Monday with Ya’alon, Ban confirmed his intention to establish a board of inquiry, and welcomed Israel’s support in bringing reconstruction materials into Gaza. Dujarric did not have any comment on assertions by Hamas that materials now coming into Gaza under a UN mechanism will be used for rebuilding the destroyed tunnels into Israel.
Hehehe, of course no comment. It seems as though Hamas and the UN are bed fellows.
Link: UN s Ban vows inquiry into weapons found at UN sites during Gaza war
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
Billo_Really, et al,
In any civilized country in the world, you will almost find (near universally) that they are all concerned and have laws pertaining to the use of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the furtherance of peace and stability. This is not a policy shared by the Palestinians.
(COMMENT)Why can't Hamas have weapons?
Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?
The Palestinians, in fact all people, have the right of self-defense. But no one can claim the right of aggression. In the case of the Palestinians, they have consistently initiated hostilities in the name of liberating Palestine from Israeli Occupation. The Hostile Arab Palestinian have a an established policy to eliminate the Israeli State.
Reaffirms its Resolution 1373 (2001) and in particular its decisions that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts and refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists;
The events that fomented and instigated Operation Protective Edge are aggressive actions, with the Palestinians as the aggressor.
The appropriate action, in the face of an aggressor with the well established past history of criminal and terrorist behaviors is:
The first use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression [Article 2. A/RES/3314(XXIX)] although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter.
Measures to eliminate international terrorism (A/RES/46/51) Calls upon all States to fulfill their obligations under international law to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in other States, or acquiescing in or encouraging activities within their territory directed towards the commission of such acts;
The Palestinians instigated the assault on Israel, using weapons in a matter inconsistent with "self-defense."
Most Respectfully,
R
The Palestinians instigated the assault on Israel, using weapons in a matter inconsistent with "self-defense."
That is debatable who instigated what, most of the fighting is debatable of who the instigator was .
Also its a fact that most of the battles occurred before oncoming elections in Israel.
The announcement of Hamas and Fatah marriage was the start of Protective Edge so Israel retaliated with " punitive punishment" of seizing more land to build on, and then 3 teens end up missing of which Israel then does a major ground intrusion, arresting over 400 they said and confiscating money and jewelry.
That in itself is enough to warrant defense.
... What would you say if Israel fired rockets at gazan schools, planted high explosives underneath gazan schools and targeted gazan children with chemical/biological weapons ?
Targetting children and unarmed civilians with weapons of terror is not defence or resistance, it is an act of terrorist aggression....
