Uh Oh April 2010 was colder than April 1998!

[Old Rocks]

Let's see how warm it'll be this summer, Vanna!

Warm, with some interesting storms.

Why don't you predict us another ice age, ol' Dooodeeee.......

 

[Big Fitz]

Evolution is a lie.

Vaccinations are a myth.

Education is just a worthless people of paper.

No no... Evolution is a THEORY on the mechanics of how life came to be. It is not truth OR fact. It is our best guess, nor does it rule out an intelligent source of creation, just the mechanics of mutation.

Vaccinations aren't a myth. But there are dangerous types of vaccinations that need re-evaluation into possible causal nature of autism.

Education is worthless if you took any of these degrees with no intent to teach, preach or perform: psychology, history, liberal arts, art, music, english, sociology, philosophy, religion, anthropology, archaeology, education and many many more.

Since you have displayed no evidence of ever having any education, I would say that you are not qualified to judge on that issue. Same goes for the other yappers on this board

And you're qualified for what, Millrat? Unplugging toilets? I see you have the only authority to appoint truthiness still.

You can get off that moral high ground. The backlighting makes you a wonderful target.

And where's that proof man's causing any climate change? Still nothing huh?

 

[Oddball]

Let's see how warm it'll be this summer, Vanna!

Warm, with some interesting storms....

Way to go out on a limb, Swami!

 

[Big Fitz]

Let's see how warm it'll be this summer, Vanna!

Warm, with some interesting storms....

Way to go out on a limb, Swami!

I predict a lot of happy with a lot of hysterical fat people jumping around when they ought not.

 

[Old Rocks]

No no... Evolution is a THEORY on the mechanics of how life came to be. It is not truth OR fact. It is our best guess, nor does it rule out an intelligent source of creation, just the mechanics of mutation.

Vaccinations aren't a myth. But there are dangerous types of vaccinations that need re-evaluation into possible causal nature of autism.

Education is worthless if you took any of these degrees with no intent to teach, preach or perform: psychology, history, liberal arts, art, music, english, sociology, philosophy, religion, anthropology, archaeology, education and many many more.

Since you have displayed no evidence of ever having any education, I would say that you are not qualified to judge on that issue. Same goes for the other yappers on this board

And you're qualified for what, Millrat? Unplugging toilets? I see you have the only authority to appoint truthiness still.

You can get off that moral high ground. The backlighting makes you a wonderful target.

And where's that proof man's causing any climate change? Still nothing huh?

Right here, you poor ignorant ass. Real scientists, American Institute of Physics

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

 

[Old Rocks]

Let's see how warm it'll be this summer, Vanna!

Warm, with some interesting storms....

Way to go out on a limb, Swami!

Really? We shall see.

And now your prediction, Dooodeee.........

Or are you afraid to back your assertations with anything?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Since you have displayed no evidence of ever having any education, I would say that you are not qualified to judge on that issue. Same goes for the other yappers on this board

And you're qualified for what, Millrat? Unplugging toilets? I see you have the only authority to appoint truthiness still.

You can get off that moral high ground. The backlighting makes you a wonderful target.

And where's that proof man's causing any climate change? Still nothing huh?

Right here, you poor ignorant ass. Real scientists, American Institute of Physics

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

You keep getting your planets confused, we're discussing Earth, not Venus.

You hypothesis is "Deminimus increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 causes instantaneous, cataclysmic and irreversible changes in Earth's climate" has never been show in any laboratory experiment.

Not even once.

 

[Oddball]

Warm, with some interesting storms....

Way to go out on a limb, Swami!

Really? We shall see.

And now your prediction, Dooodeee.........

Or are you afraid to back your assertations with anything?

Unlike arrogant know-it-all asses like you, I find it easy to say those three little words that some arrogant know-it-all asses find so hard to say.....











I...........don't.............know.

 

[Big Fitz]

Since you have displayed no evidence of ever having any education, I would say that you are not qualified to judge on that issue. Same goes for the other yappers on this board

And you're qualified for what, Millrat? Unplugging toilets? I see you have the only authority to appoint truthiness still.

You can get off that moral high ground. The backlighting makes you a wonderful target.

And where's that proof man's causing any climate change? Still nothing huh?

Right here, you poor ignorant ass. Real scientists, American Institute of Physics

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Real 'scientists' as approved by Mr. Truthiness himself.

 

[gslack]

Reality

APRIL 2010 UAH Global Temperature Update: +0.50 deg. C Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

The global-average lower tropospheric temperature continues warm: +0.50 deg. C for April, 2010, although it is 0.15 deg. C cooler than last month. The linear trend since 1979 is now +0.14 deg. C per decade.

Arctic temps (not shown) continued a 5-month string of much above normal temps (similar to Nov 05 to Mar 06) as the tropics showed signs of retreating from the current El Nino event. Antarctic temperatures were cooler than the long term average. Through the first 120 days of 1998 versus 2010, the average anomaly was +0.655 in 1998, and +0.602 in 2010. These values are within the margin of error in terms of their difference, so the recent global tropospheric warmth associated with the current El Nino has been about the same as that during the peak warmth of the 1997-98 El Nino.

Oh good you got that from the frauds own blog..... Thanks pal....

 

[saveliberty]

We ain't talkin' movies, dumbo. If you look at the graph in the article, you will see that the temperatures worldwide have been steadily rising with the natural variations imposed on that rise.

Not only that, Dr. Roy Spencer is a skeptic, but has to report the numbers correctly, as he has already been caught in a very embarrasing error in reporting the numbers.

Okay Old Rocks. Here is a little puzzle for you. Why is the period from 1978-1998 representative of the Earth's average temperature? That is the benchmark of your graph's data for determining average. All your graph shows is it is warmer in the last couple of years than the average. The average has no basis in fact.

Do you want to know why it is used? Because it is when satellite data became available for comparision. That is it and nothing more. I submit that our current temperatures are more normal for the planet than the model you support.

 

[gslack]

Olsocks, gets busted citing biased or misleading/wrong data from various blogs.

He gets busted doing it...

He then goes and gets the same crap from the guys who created the misleading and wrong reports or data..

Wow... And I thought christophera in the conspiracy thread was a loon.....

 

[Big Fitz]

And the Crickets go "Chirp. I say, Chirp."

Hey crocks, you got any 'science' that can't be linked back to the biggest scientific frauds since Rachel Carson?

 

[gslack]

No matter how much pseudo science they bring out; all of it can be negated by two simple facts they keep avoiding and dancing around...

1. The ice core, tree ring, and all other paleo-climate data, show a 600-800 or higher year difference between CO2 increase and temperature rise..The temperature rises, then hundreds to a thousand years later the CO2 levels rise. This shows categorically that CO2 is an effect of the warming and not the cause of the warming.

2. The UEA CRU, the IPCC, and all the other major proponents of AGW who make, gather, and report on the data. Either deny the importance of the sun or downplay its effects. And never mention the almost 100% correlation between solar output, variance, position, gravitational field, and our overall position relative to the sun and all the other celestial bodies in the galaxy and known universe. Despite admitting and knowing the sun is the prime driver of climate on this planet.

They know these things now, there is just too much money, too many careers, and too much bullshit for them to let it go and admit they were wrong now. A scandal of this magnitude coming to light would ruin too many careers and too many investments in it.

Now until the lying little bastards can address the issues above with a sound and logical/reasonable answer. Or show how those are both non-factors in the real world (not a computer model built to give a desired outcome), they are done and so is there asinine theory...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No matter how much pseudo science they bring out; all of it can be negated by two simple facts they keep avoiding and dancing around...

1. The ice core, tree ring, and all other paleo-climate data, show a 600-800 or higher year difference between CO2 increase and temperature rise..The CO2 rises, then hundreds to a thousand years later the temperatures rise. This shows categorically that CO2 is an effect of the warming and not the cause of the warming.

2. The UEA CRU, the IPCC, and all the other major proponents of AGW who make, gather, and report on the data. Either deny the importance of the sun or downplay its effects. And never mention the almost 100% correlation between solar output, variance, position, gravitational field, and our overall position relative to the sun and all the other celestial bodies in the galaxy and known universe. Despite admitting and knowing the sun is the prime driver of climate on this planet.

They know these things now, there is just too much money, too many careers, and too much bullshit for them to let it go and admit they were wrong now. A scandal of this magnitude coming to light would ruin too many careers and too many investments in it.

Now until the lying little bastards can address the issues above with a sound and logical/reasonable answer. Or show how those are both non-factors in the real world (not a computer model built to give a desired outcome), they are done and so is there asinine theory...

Since laboratory experiments refuse to validate their hypothesis all they can do is point to places where its "warm" (whatever the fuck that means) and should "Look! Global Warming!!"

 

[konradv]

Since laboratory experiments refuse to validate their hypothesis all they can do is point to places where its "warm" (whatever the fuck that means) and should "Look! Global Warming!!"
-----------------------------------

That's a lie. You've been told that before, but you keep posting it. It's SIMPLE to show that CO2 absorbs infra-red radiaition in the lab. There's no reson why it wouldn't also do so in the atmosphere, so what's happening to the extra absorbed energy, if not to heat the earth? Quit spreading your lies and answer a simple question.

 

[saveliberty]

Since laboratory experiments refuse to validate their hypothesis all they can do is point to places where its "warm" (whatever the fuck that means) and should "Look! Global Warming!!"
-----------------------------------

That's a lie. You've been told that before, but you keep posting it. It's SIMPLE to show that CO2 absorbs infra-red radiaition in the lab. There's no reson why it wouldn't also do so in the atmosphere, so what's happening to the extra absorbed energy, if not to heat the earth? Quit spreading your lies and answer a simple question.

You can do many things in the lab that have no application out in the world, like giving rats cancer from smoking cigarettes. Hiding behind "the lab" is not a display of science. You were given many reasons why the lab results would not translate into an open system. It is you who are misleading folks.

 

[Old Rocks]

Liberty, old girl, the lab work was done in 1858 by Tyndal.

Now there are many scientific societies on this planet that cover the many subjects of scientific interest. These societies are made up of working scientists. And their Societies make policy statements on aspects of their studies which affect the way we live.

So show me a single one that states that AGW is not occuring.

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | Union of Concerned Scientists

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming
In the past few years, scientific societies and scientists have released statements and studies showing the growing consensus on climate change science. A common objection to taking action to reduce our heat-trapping emissions has been uncertainty within the scientific community on whether or not global warming is happening and whether it is caused by humans. However, there is now an overwhelming scientific consensus that global warming is indeed happening and humans are contributing to it. Below are links to documents and statements attesting to this consensus.

Top Scientists Affirm Consensus on Global Warming

SAN DIEGO, California, February 20, 2010 (ENS) - A panel of eminent U.S. and European scientists has confirmed the widespread scientific consensus that the Earth's climate is warming due to human activities, but said they and their colleagues should have responded more quickly and effectively to news of an error in a major climate report and hacked researcher e-mails.

In a symposium Friday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement Science, AAAS, the scientific leaders acknowledged errors in a 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and possibly impolitic email exchanges by East Anglian University climate researchers.

But they expressed shock at the political effects of the disclosures and said the impact was far out of proportion to the overwhelming evidence that human activity is changing the Earth's climate.


"There has been no change in the scientific community, no change whatsoever," in the consensus that global average temperatures have been steadily climbing since the mid-20th century," said Jerry North, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University

 

[Old Rocks]

What we have here is a bunch of overage adolescents that are incapable of finding a credible source to back their willfull ignorance. So all we get from them is yap-yap. And scatalogical posts meaning nothing at all.

 

[gslack]

Since laboratory experiments refuse to validate their hypothesis all they can do is point to places where its "warm" (whatever the fuck that means) and should "Look! Global Warming!!"
-----------------------------------

That's a lie. You've been told that before, but you keep posting it. It's SIMPLE to show that CO2 absorbs infra-red radiaition in the lab. There's no reson why it wouldn't also do so in the atmosphere, so what's happening to the extra absorbed energy, if not to heat the earth? Quit spreading your lies and answer a simple question.

And again you are lying.... His assertion or challenge was stated time and again, and in every reprisal or response, you and your side have tried to minimalize, mislead, give a false claim of his assertion, or attempt to cloud the point with inconsequential and misleading data...

None of you have gone to his point directly with any honest and valid refutations....

Now I point you once more to the points I raised again in my previous post... I have been pointing out these problems with AGW theory for a while now and no one responds to them except one time when oldrocks tried the bait and switch....

Now junior if you cannot show my assertions false, cannot show crusaders assertions false, than we can safely say you then cannot either prove your AGW theory correct, nor dismiss our assertions.....