Uh Oh April 2010 was colder than April 1998!

Al-Gore-Explains-Cold-Weather-701167.jpg
 
Reality

APRIL 2010 UAH Global Temperature Update: +0.50 deg. C Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

The global-average lower tropospheric temperature continues warm: +0.50 deg. C for April, 2010, although it is 0.15 deg. C cooler than last month. The linear trend since 1979 is now +0.14 deg. C per decade.

Arctic temps (not shown) continued a 5-month string of much above normal temps (similar to Nov 05 to Mar 06) as the tropics showed signs of retreating from the current El Nino event. Antarctic temperatures were cooler than the long term average. Through the first 120 days of 1998 versus 2010, the average anomaly was +0.655 in 1998, and +0.602 in 2010. These values are within the margin of error in terms of their difference, so the recent global tropospheric warmth associated with the current El Nino has been about the same as that during the peak warmth of the 1997-98 El Nino.
 
Departure from an average temperature using 1979 to 1998 as reference years. Also they calibrated the gages on earth before launching. Does anyone see a margin for error there? How about internal temps of the satellite effecting the data?
 
Remember the movie "Maverick" with Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster?

After promising to help a wagon train get back their stolen belongings, an argument ensues over how they were going to track the 'hostile indians' whom Bret insisted were just thugs masquerading as indians.

Mel: You see that hawk over there? (Gesturing with pistol)
Jodie: Oh! Don't shoot the hawk!
Mel: Relax, I'm not gonna shoot the hawk. But do you know what that hawk means?
Jodie: No....?
Mel: Nothing. It means nothing. But you didn't know that did you?
Jodie slaps Mel

Noticing a parallel?
 
Reality

APRIL 2010 UAH Global Temperature Update: +0.50 deg. C Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

The global-average lower tropospheric temperature continues warm: +0.50 deg. C for April, 2010, although it is 0.15 deg. C cooler than last month. The linear trend since 1979 is now +0.14 deg. C per decade.

Arctic temps (not shown) continued a 5-month string of much above normal temps (similar to Nov 05 to Mar 06) as the tropics showed signs of retreating from the current El Nino event. Antarctic temperatures were cooler than the long term average. Through the first 120 days of 1998 versus 2010, the average anomaly was +0.655 in 1998, and +0.602 in 2010. These values are within the margin of error in terms of their difference, so the recent global tropospheric warmth associated with the current El Nino has been about the same as that during the peak warmth of the 1997-98 El Nino.
Black's still white I see at the Ole Crocks household.
 
I wanna know where Ole Crocks keeps his thermometer that he gets such different data.
 
We ain't talkin' movies, dumbo. If you look at the graph in the article, you will see that the temperatures worldwide have been steadily rising with the natural variations imposed on that rise.

Not only that, Dr. Roy Spencer is a skeptic, but has to report the numbers correctly, as he has already been caught in a very embarrasing error in reporting the numbers.
 
We ain't talkin' movies, dumbo. If you look at the graph in the article, you will see that the temperatures worldwide have been steadily rising with the natural variations imposed on that rise.

Not only that, Dr. Roy Spencer is a skeptic, but has to report the numbers correctly, as he has already been caught in a very embarrasing error in reporting the numbers.
Oh, and CRU, UCAR, NCAR, Penn State and James Hansen haven't all been caught shading the stats?

puuuuuulllEEEEAAASE! :rofl:
 
But Crocks! You still can't prove mankind did any of this. Never could, never will.

LOL Pop goes the religion...

yet again.
 
Evolution is a lie.

Vaccinations are a myth.

Education is just a worthless people of paper.
 
We ain't talkin' movies, dumbo. If you look at the graph in the article, you will see that the temperatures worldwide have been steadily rising with the natural variations imposed on that rise.

Not only that, Dr. Roy Spencer is a skeptic, but has to report the numbers correctly, as he has already been caught in a very embarrasing error in reporting the numbers.
Would this also take into the account the depletion of weather stations in colder climates while the increase in warmer climates? Not to mention the massive number of surface stations found to be not in compliance with proper standards to collect temperature data in the US, let alone the rest of the world?

Could these little issues be skewing any results? hmmmmmmmm......
 
Reality

APRIL 2010 UAH Global Temperature Update: +0.50 deg. C Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

The global-average lower tropospheric temperature continues warm: +0.50 deg. C for April, 2010, although it is 0.15 deg. C cooler than last month. The linear trend since 1979 is now +0.14 deg. C per decade.

Arctic temps (not shown) continued a 5-month string of much above normal temps (similar to Nov 05 to Mar 06) as the tropics showed signs of retreating from the current El Nino event. Antarctic temperatures were cooler than the long term average. Through the first 120 days of 1998 versus 2010, the average anomaly was +0.655 in 1998, and +0.602 in 2010. These values are within the margin of error in terms of their difference, so the recent global tropospheric warmth associated with the current El Nino has been about the same as that during the peak warmth of the 1997-98 El Nino.

See, you find a place where it's warmer and yell, "Thar she blows! Global Warming!!!"

Then people who make money from this fake science give you an Amen! which is also known as "Peer review" and viola, a consensus on "Global Warming"!

That's not science, but what do you expect when the Laboratory experiments refuse to validate your theory?
 
Evolution is a lie.

Vaccinations are a myth.

Education is just a worthless people of paper.
No no... Evolution is a THEORY on the mechanics of how life came to be. It is not truth OR fact. It is our best guess, nor does it rule out an intelligent source of creation, just the mechanics of mutation.

Vaccinations aren't a myth. But there are dangerous types of vaccinations that need re-evaluation into possible causal nature of autism.

Education is worthless if you took any of these degrees with no intent to teach, preach or perform: psychology, history, liberal arts, art, music, english, sociology, philosophy, religion, anthropology, archaeology, education and many many more.
 
We ain't talkin' movies, dumbo. If you look at the graph in the article, you will see that the temperatures worldwide have been steadily rising with the natural variations imposed on that rise.

Not only that, Dr. Roy Spencer is a skeptic, but has to report the numbers correctly, as he has already been caught in a very embarrasing error in reporting the numbers.
Oh, and CRU, UCAR, NCAR, Penn State and James Hansen haven't all been caught shading the stats?

puuuuuulllEEEEAAASE! :rofl:

Only in your febrile mind, Doooodeee......

Of course, the numbers I gave you were from Dr. Roy Spencer.
 
Evolution is a lie.

Vaccinations are a myth.

Education is just a worthless people of paper.
No no... Evolution is a THEORY on the mechanics of how life came to be. It is not truth OR fact. It is our best guess, nor does it rule out an intelligent source of creation, just the mechanics of mutation.

Vaccinations aren't a myth. But there are dangerous types of vaccinations that need re-evaluation into possible causal nature of autism.

Education is worthless if you took any of these degrees with no intent to teach, preach or perform: psychology, history, liberal arts, art, music, english, sociology, philosophy, religion, anthropology, archaeology, education and many many more.

Since you have displayed no evidence of ever having any education, I would say that you are not qualified to judge on that issue. Same goes for the other yappers on this board:lol:
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top