U.S. Senator ties Secretary's pay to Secretary's policy decisions.

OohPooPahDoo

Gold Member
May 11, 2011
15,347
985
175
N'Awlins Mid-City
Republican Senator David Vitter is up to it again.

When he's not getting his diaper changed by a prostitute or changing his mind on whether to support funding of the new LSU hospital only after historic buildings have been razed, he's telling cabinet level executive officers, appointed by the President to serve at his pleasure, that they must make the policy decisions he wants them to make if they want to get the same pay as the every other cabinet member.


The committee dismissed a complaint by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington regarding Vitter’s blocking of a bill that would provide a $19,600 salary increase for Salazar. The raise would allow Salazar’s salary to be in line with those of other Cabinet officials.
“While the committee found that there was no substantial credible evidence that you violated the law or Senate rules, it did conclude that it is inappropriate to condition support for a Secretary’s personal salary increase directly on his or her performance of a specific official act,” committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Vice Chairman Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) wrote Vitter in a letter sent Thursday and made public Friday.


Read more: After ethics ruling, Vitter vows to keep blocking Salazar's pay raise - POLITICO.com

The Senate, quite obviously, needs to change their rules. When a Senator undermines the authority of the President of the United States over his own cabinet by offering salaray compensation in exchange for making a particular executive decision, he has violated the sacred balance of power between the branches of government that our Founders shed blood and sweat to create.



“While senators have long used holds on nominations to help persuade administrations to carry out or change policies, tying an incumbent Secretary’s personal salary to his or her performance of specific official act is different, places a Secretary in a precarious and potentially untenable position, and undermines a basic principle of government service,” Boxer and Isakson said in a letter dismissing a complaint against Vitter. “Had Secretary Salazar complied with this request, it would have appeared that his decision was made because of his personal interests, and not the public interest.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74689.html#ixzz1wTqrbVXt

WE CAN'T HAVE THIS IN GOVERNMENT!



David Vitter. What a fucking turd.


david-vitter-diaper-boy-cop.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top