U.S. Prime Grade Horse Manure

Discussion in 'Tea Party' started by Flanders, Dec 12, 2015.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    [​IMG]
    https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/...onaws.com/rapgenius/1375988913_usda_prime.jpg

    I’m sensing an undercurrent that says some big name establishment Republicans are threatening to leave the party if Donald Trump gets the nomination. The threat is horseshit. Trump billing himself as a negotiator is fine if it ended at negotiating with foreign governments, but it also means bipartisan legislation which is exactly how Republicans and Democrats have been screwing Americans since the LBJ years. Democrats love bipartisan negotiations because they never once compromised entre nous on their Socialist agenda.

    NOTE: I do not know how it is in Trump’s business negotiations, but should he get the nomination he better understand that Democrats negotiate incrementally. Anything Democrats agree to moves their agenda forward one baby step at a time. Example:


    In 1993, Hillary chaired the Task Force on National Health Care Reform. After months of meeting with families & health care professionals, the Task Force recommended the Health Care Security Act of 1994. “I am disappointed we were not able to make more progress.” Hillary said. “Now I’m from the school of smaller steps, but I believe we must continue to make progress. It’s still important that we increase access to quality health care for working families.”

    Hillary Clinton on Health Care

    Question: When did the negotiations take place for the Affordable Care Act? Answer: Democrats began negotiating after the pubic found out what was in it.

    Establishment Republicans would leave the party a lot faster if Ted Cruz gets the nomination. They fear Cruz will negotiate the same way Democrats negotiate —— It’s our way or nothing. Bottom line: Karl Rove’s Republicans and Democrats can live with Trump, but they will not live with Ted Cruz.

    In addition to Republicans leaving the party because of Trump being U.S. Prime Grade horseshit, top Republicans deserting en masse has been a fallback position for decades. The Democrat party is the fallback position.

    There was never a chance establishment Republicans would form a third party when the Democrat party gives them everything they want. The fact is: There is no better way to crush a real third party than for establishment Republicans to combine forces with the Democrats the very instant any one of their New World Order governing principles is threatened. And why should they form a third party? Between establishment Republicans and Democrats they brought the country to where it is today.

    Openly joining with the Democrats changes one thing only. Establishment Republicans no longer have to pretend they oppose the income tax, the welfare state and the United Nations. Every wealthy, influential, Republican benefits as much, or more, from the three pillars of political power in today’s America than do leading Democrats. Trump’s only flaw is that he unwittingly dynamited the United Nations when he made United Nations refugees the one issue that unifies Americans against the ruling class.

    Bottom line: Tea Partiers must not fall for the same old con job —— nominate somebody who can beat Hillary Clinton ——— assuming she has not been indicted before the nominating convention.

    NOTE: A look at the polls telling the public which of the Republican wannabes can beat Hillary Clinton says it all. If Daffy Duck cannot beat Clinton the American people deserve her in a half-ass democracy.


    In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve. Misattributed to Joseph de Maistre

    [​IMG]
    https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...-hurt-more-than-you-deserve-feeling-quote.jpg

    I assume Ted Cruz is going to win the nomination outright, or win it in the latest media STOP CRUZ strategy —— a brokered convention.

    Finally, Cruz will need a lot more seats in Congress considered necessary to stop the Democrat party’s betrayals. And he needs those seats in less time than my original estimate. The reality of Democrats and Republicans joining forces to defend the global government crowd is at hand sooner than I thought. Nevertheless, there is still time for Tea Party conservatives to give Cruz a cushion in Congress —— a Tea Party landside in 2016 congressional races will stop Democrats more effectively than will beating Hillary Clinton. Giving President Cruz a bigger cushion in the 2018 midterms would easily put an end to Socialism, as well as clean up all of the garbage Socialists/Communists dumped on this country in a century.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Delta4Embassy
    Offline

    Delta4Embassy Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2013
    Messages:
    25,745
    Thanks Received:
    3,026
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Earth
    Ratings:
    +8,241
    Prime Grade Manure? As opposed to the crappy stuff? ;)
     
  3. imawhosure
    Offline

    imawhosure Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2015
    Messages:
    5,935
    Thanks Received:
    1,268
    Trophy Points:
    360
    Ratings:
    +5,732
    Good read Flanders; excellent points also. You are correct, Cruz is the candidate that scares the left the most. If Cruz gets the nomination and wins the general, the lefts power structure of phony departments will start to be dismantled quickly, and they know it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
  5. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    [​IMG]
    Phyllis Schlafly
    http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/03/Schlafly.jpg

    A nod from the redoubtable Phyllis Schlafly goes a long way with conservatives like me:

    Donald Trump’s call for a temporary ban on all Muslim entry in the United States is getting enthusiastic support from a conservative icon, as legendary activist Phyllis Schlafly called for the grassroots to support his plan.​

    I just wish that people over at the National Review, and elsewhere, stop pussyfooting around with phrases like “. . . “ideological screening” . . .”:

    In a National Review editorial, Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, called for “ideological screening” of all who want to enter the country. By that he means the U.S. should deny entry to those who believe in Islamic supremacy, whether or not they have committed violent acts in the past.

    Trump's Muslim moratorium backed by conservative icon
    Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 12/12/2015 @ 7:03 pm In

    Trump’s Muslim moratorium backed by conservative icon

    and get to the heart of the matter. Islam is a political movement. Islam has always been a political movement. Islam will always be a political movement disguised as a religion. See this thread:

    Tweaking Trump | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
     
  6. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    The Donald is sounding a lot like a bipartisan Democrat:


    It sounds to me that Trump decided he will be another business as usual president making deals with Democrats in a rigged game. My guess is that he is dead meat if he fails to prove he can be more like Ted Cruz:
    Incidentally, the Hillary Clinton threat is not going to work with conservatives even if she stays out of jail. A Biden threat is a joke, but at least it is serious.
     
  7. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    Negotiating against Democrats will make negotiating against Muslims look like a warm Summer breeze. Ask those douche bags negotiating against Iran’s mullahs if you doubt me.

    Trump is going in the right direction, but he never hits bedrock. So how is he going negotiate against partition?



    Of course, banning United Nations refugees on the grounds of safety is correct, while letting Islam off the hook avoids identifying Islam as a political movement. One can hardly deny the truth if they understand Islam’s tried and true Partition Strategy.
    [​IMG]
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...a-en.svg/2000px-Partition_of_India-en.svg.png

    In August, 1947, when, after three hundred years in India, the British finally left, the subcontinent was partitioned into two independent nation states: Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan. Immediately, there began one of the greatest migrations in human history, as millions of Muslims trekked to West and East Pakistan (the latter now known as Bangladesh) while millions of Hindus and Sikhs headed in the opposite direction. Many hundreds of thousands never made it.​

    June 29, 2015 Issue
    The Great Divide
    The violent legacy of Indian Partition.
    By William Dalrymple

    The Mutual Genocide of Indian Partition

    Partition gave Islam two large chunks of India. Only fools believe that Muslims will not do the same thing here and in European countries as soon as they have the numbers. The strategy is to increase the violence until Muslims get partition; i.e. territory.

    There is a way to stop partition without killing every Muslim in sight. Expel them. Islam already has a lot of territory. Simply deport every Muslim to a Muslim country.

    NOTE: Millions of Muslims remained in India after Partition. They will do the same here and Europe. The touchy-feely multicultural freaks will see to it.

    Question: Can Trump tell us if partition is about religion or a political movement?
     
  8. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    The trope that “overwhelming numbers of Muslims condemn terrorism,” manifestly false measured against mountains of polling data, refuses to go away. In one form or another it is trotted out by Jihadist apologists after each and every Islamist atrocity, always without factual support.

    Polls of Muslims in Western and majority Muslim countries consistently reveal numerically significant support for Islamic terrorism.​

    December 18, 2015
    Trump and the Hazards of Muslim Immigration
    By Jared E. Peterson

    Articles: Trump and the Hazards of Muslim Immigration

    A very informative piece by Jared E. Peterson does not cite one reputable poll that takes this into consideration:
    Individual Muslims may despise the brutality and violence, but when faced with a choice they will choose the greater good in their eyes.
     
  9. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    I noticed that banning United Nations refugees fell off the media radar. Needless to say that vetting refugees never stood a chance thanks in large part to this guy:

    Peter Sutherland, the Secretary General’s special representative on international migration, shares that view. From his perch as chairman of Goldman Sachs International and special U.N. envoy, he has pushed for open borders on a global scale, long before the war in Syria and photos of drowned toddlers grabbed the world’s attention.

    In 2012, Sutherland told the House of Lords the European Union must “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states. He believes culturally distinct nations cannot survive and “have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them,” the BBC reported.

    Sutherland, who served as the first director-general of the World Trade Organization and has been called the father of globalization, says all “individuals should have a freedom of choice” about where to live and work, whether or not their home country is engulfed in war. This, he says, is a “crucial dynamic for economic growth.”

    U.N. to hand out marching orders on immigration
    Posted By Curtis Ellis On 09/09/2015 @ 7:35 pm

    U.N. to hand out marching orders on immigration

    It is harder to find refugees AFTER they get here than it is to find the locations of every gun when law-abiding gun owners must submit to background checks.

    [​IMG]
    http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2015-12/195728_5_.jpg
     
  10. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    Everything in the Washington Post proves my case:

    [​IMG]
    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), a 2016 GOP presidential candidate who’s currently surging in polls six weeks ahead of the first primary contests, fired back at a Washington Post cartoonist for mocking his daughters Caroline and Catherine.
    http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/12/ted-cruz-daughters-cartoon-420x315.jpg

    UPDATE: Washington Post Yanks Cartoon Mocking Ted Cruz’s Daughters After Breitbart News, Cruz Fight Back
    by Matthew Boyle
    22 Dec 2015

    Washington Post Mocks Ted Cruz's Daughters as Monkeys
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

azs

,

best cameras