U.S. government seeks facebook help to wiretap messenger

[MindWars]

The U.S. government is trying to force Facebook Inc (FB.O) to break the encryption in its popular Messenger app so law enforcement may listen to a suspect’s voice conversations in a criminal probe, three people briefed on the case said, resurrecting the issue of whether companies can be compelled to alter their products to enable surveillance.
U.S. government seeks Facebook help to wiretap Messenger – sources


Tards won't care, they will just offer to use a probe anywhere their parental gov. wants them to. They love gov. telling them what to do and how to do it.
The sad part is socities idiots blame Trump when these laws were put in place by LOSER OBAMA and BUSH.....

The Eneimist are those after Trump.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It's a false flag. Facebook doesn't actually exist. It's a front and Mark Zuckerberg is a crisis actor.

 

[boedicca]

Anyone who uses the Surveillance Media should understand what it really is. It has nothing to do with being "social".

 

[MindWars]

It's a false flag. Facebook doesn't actually exist. It's a front and Mark Zuckerberg is a crisis actor.

when this happen only the POWERFUL can speak ........ that's an actual crisis called " REALITY" .

The left get off on total.

 

[Montrovant]

1. Which laws are the DOJ arguing give them the right to force a company to break their encryption to allow the government to listen to conversations? The articles don't specify.

2. Presidents don't create laws, that's for Congress. The executive enforces laws.

3. If Obama and Bush get the blame for laws passed by the legislative branch during their administrations, why shouldn't Trump get the blame for the way the executive branch is trying to enforce those laws during his administration?

 

[Montrovant]

Anyone who uses the Surveillance Media should understand what it really is. It has nothing to do with being "social".

Just because they are taking and selling data about you doesn't mean the platforms can't also be social!

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

2. Presidents don't create laws, that's for Congress. The executive enforces laws.

In an ideal country, but we left that behind long ago. What do you think hink Obama meant when he said he had w pen and a phone?

Also, the endless federal agencies enforce regulations that have the same effect as law

 

[Montrovant]

2. Presidents don't create laws, that's for Congress. The executive enforces laws.

In an ideal country, but we left that behind long ago. What do you think hink Obama meant when he said he had w pen and a phone?

Also, the endless federal agencies enforce regulations that have the same effect as law

We can talk about executive orders, or the seemingly endless bureaucracies in the federal government, and the way they often get around the executive's inability to create law. That doesn't change that the executive can't actually create law.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

And don't forget SCs now feel free to create law out of thin air. As a result, 60,000,000 American babies never had a chance.

 

[Montrovant]

And Don forget SCs now feel free to create law out of thin air. As a result, 60,000,000 American babies never had a chance.

I think that is a much different thing. The USSC is supposed to determine how the Constitution applies to cases brought before it. They certainly don't always get it right, but even in the case of Roe v Wade it wasn't creating new law, but rather deciding that privacy protections applied to something they previously had not.

It may seem like a small distinction, but I think it is an important one.

 

[MindWars]