U.S. Georgia Power interested in Turkey’s nuclear plant

ekrem

Silver Member
Aug 9, 2005
7,955
583
93
Governor of Georgia and CEO of Georgia-Power have come to Turkey and will discuss building nuclear power reactors of which Turkey intends to build 23 units until 2023 (mainly 4 reactor-units per power-plant).

U.S.-based Georgia Power is interested in joining Turkey’s nuclear power plant project, its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Paul Bowers said on June 8.

“Turkey wants to be independent in the energy arena. We can help them because we have been constructing nuclear power plants for the past 30 years,” Bowers told the Anatolia News Agency during his visit to Turkey with Georgia State Governor Nathan Deal. Bowers stressed that Georgia Power had expertise in ensuring that nuclear energy remains both safe and clean. Bowers and Deal are planning to meet with Turkey’s Economy Ministry during their visit to discuss their interest in the nuclear plant project.

“We have 104 nuclear reactors in the U.S. and 400 around the world. We ensure that our nuclear projects are in line with all safety standards. If there are any other recommendations or suggestions beyond this, we can of course take those on as well,” Bowers said.

The move comes as Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Taner Yıldız has announced that Turkey is determined to build nuclear power plants, and aims to establish 23 nuclear units by 2023. The country is in talks with Japan, South Korea, China and Canada for the second nuclear power plant to be constructed in the northern province of Sinop. Russia’s nuclear energy giant Rosatom has been awarded the contract to build Turkey’s first nuclear power plant in the southern province of Mersin. The plant with four reactors will cost around $20 billion and will be active for 60 years.

Deal, meanwhile, stressed that Turkey was a regional leader and that as far as he could tell the economy was very strong. When asked about the signing of a possible free trade agreement with the United States, Deal said that he hoped that this issue would be taken up by Washington as soon as possible. He noted that the slowdown in the signing of such an agreement was due to the current European debt crisis.
ENERGY - Georgia Power interested in Turkey
 
Last edited:
Small modular reactor to be built at Oak Ridge, Tennessee...
:cool:
US considers smaller nuclear reactors
Fri, Feb 22, 2013 - The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) will pay Babcock & Wilcox, a nuclear equipment company, to complete extensive design work and apply for permission to build a new kind of nuclear plant, a “small modular reactor,” at a site in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, the authority and the company announced on Wednesday.
The two entities did not disclose the value of the contract, which will be paid in part by the US Department of Energy under a program to encourage nuclear innovation. The announcement is a step forward in a program that advocates hope will develop a new class of nuclear plants that can be mostly built in a factory, shipped by rail or barge, deployed quickly and sold around the world, especially in places where the power grid could not handle a big plant. Because the reactors are relatively small, the idea is that in an emergency they can be cooled with the natural circulation of water and heat, rather than by systems that require pumps and valves and that could be disabled by power failures or human errors.

The goal for Babcock & Wilcox is a reactor that can be operated by a relatively small control room crew, perhaps two operators, and meet security requirements with fewer guards. Babcock & Wilcox mPower president Christofer Mowry said that existing big reactors rely on a “force on force concept,” with armed guards prepared to repel armed intruders, while the mPower concept was “force on concrete,” with a reactor that is housed under a concrete slab. “That’s a lot easier to defend,” he said. The reactor is intended as a direct challenge to natural gas generators, and it is intended to share two characteristics that make gas attractive.

First, the builders say they can be built quickly and be added onto later, so there is less risk of building too much capacity or running short. Second, they are meant to do something that is difficult for existing nuclear plants but easy for gas: change power output rapidly. Grid operators are increasingly challenged by having to integrate large amounts of power from wind farms and solar installations, which can experience surges or drops in output. Planners are looking for supply partners for those variable generators. Mowry said his company wanted to have the first of two units in service at Oak Ridge by 2022, an aggressive schedule that he said was “eight years and change.” The US Department of Energy could match costs up to 50 percent, depending in part on how much the US Congress allocates.

No one has built reactors of that size in the US since the 1960s, but the concept of reviving small reactors has been around in one form or another for 20 years. Four giant reactors intended to be “passively safe” are under construction but few seem likely to follow soon. Two years after Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi accident, in an era of low natural gas prices, the small reactor concept is the most popular one in the field. The company has been lining up suppliers and completing design details. However, small is a relative term — the vessel is 3.96m in diameter and 25.29m high. The idea is for a 180-megawatt reactor, which is about one-sixth the size of new conventional reactors, but about the size of some old coal units now being retired. “One of the impediments to new nuclear is the sheer scale of the financial commitment,” said Marc Chupka, an economist and consultant at the Brattle Group who specializes in electricity.

More US considers smaller nuclear reactors - Taipei Times
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top