U.S. Court decides taxpayers should pay to kill unborn Mexican anchor babies.

[BrokeLoser]

It only makes sense...right?
I mean why not...if Mexicans can sneak in here and be protected by filthy politicians, drop multiple anchor babies requiring a lifetime of spoon feeding in the laps of REAL Americans why not have us cover the cost to execute unborn anchors as well?

U.S. court sides with illegal immigrant teen seeking an abortion
U.S. Must Let Undocumented Teenager Get an Abortion, Appeals Court Says

 

[NightFox]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

 

[007]

There's no such thing as an "illegal immigrant." The term is an oxymoron.

To be an "immigrant" in America, you must first be here LEGALLY.

If you are here ILLEGALLY, you are not an "immigrant," you are an ILLEGAL ALIEN, period.

Don't play leftist PC word games.

 

[bendog]

Aren't you guys AGAINST "anchor babies"?

 

[NightFox]

Aren't you guys AGAINST "anchor babies"?

Hell no, I Like 'em.. I Like 'em A LOT

ANCHOR

BABEY

 

[BrokeLoser]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...clever spin.
What percentage of 17 year old illegal beaners do you think have $500usd lying around as an execution fund?
Don't you realize they have pit bulls and weed to buy?
Who do you think will pick up the tab?

 

[bendog]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...clever spin.
What percentage of 17 year old illegal beaners do you think have $500usd lying around as an execution fund?
Don't you realize they have pit bulls and weed to buy?
Who do you think will pick up the tab?

Loser, you do realize no tax money goes to directly providing abortions?

 

[jc456]

Aren't you guys AGAINST "anchor babies"?

yep so? kick her out and let her go to her country. I'm all good with that. I have no empathy. I also don't agree with killing human babies.

 

[jc456]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...clever spin.
What percentage of 17 year old illegal beaners do you think have $500usd lying around as an execution fund?
Don't you realize they have pit bulls and weed to buy?
Who do you think will pick up the tab?

Loser, you do realize no tax money goes to directly providing abortions?

yeah you go with that. we all know the truth. your spin and your fking fellow ahole demolosers is useless here.

 

[NightFox]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...nice spin.

LOL, Since when is the truth "spin"? I quoted from the actual Court Decision in the story you linked in your OP.

Your thread title

U.S. Court decides taxpayers should pay to kill unborn Mexican anchor babies.

is the only "spin" since the "U.S. Court" didn't decide any such thing.

You should at least read the news story before linking it in a thread OP.

Here endth the lesson.

 

[jc456]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...nice spin.

LOL, Since when is the truth "spin"? I quoted from the actual Court Decision in the story you linked in your OP.

Your thread title

U.S. Court decides taxpayers should pay to kill unborn Mexican anchor babies.

is the only "spin" since the "U.S. Court" didn't decide any such thing.

You should at least read the news story before linking it in a thread OP.

Here endth the lesson.

The OP is spot on. you're lost. that's all. see tax payers will pay for it as has already been explained in here. so sorry, you're just misguided as usual.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...clever spin.
What percentage of 17 year old illegal beaners do you think have $500usd lying around as an execution fund?
Don't you realize they have pit bulls and weed to buy?
Who do you think will pick up the tab?

Loser, you do realize no tax money goes to directly providing abortions?

Really, who "donates" to Planned Parenthood?
Where do they get their funding?

 

[jc456]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...clever spin.
What percentage of 17 year old illegal beaners do you think have $500usd lying around as an execution fund?
Don't you realize they have pit bulls and weed to buy?
Who do you think will pick up the tab?

Loser, you do realize no tax money goes to directly providing abortions?

Really, who "donates" to Planned Parenthood?
Where do they get their funding?

hmmm

 

[miketx]

Aren't you guys AGAINST "anchor babies"?

Yes, but unlike you we are against killing them.

 

[jc456]

Aren't you guys AGAINST "anchor babies"?

Yes, but unlike you we are against killing them.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Dems give government funding to Planned Parenthood and then Planned Parenthood kicks $money$ back to the Dem campaign funds.
It' really sleazy.

 

[Lakhota]

It only makes sense...right?
I mean why not...if Mexicans can sneak in here and be protected by filthy politicians, drop multiple anchor babies requiring a lifetime of spoon feeding in the laps of REAL Americans why not have us cover the cost to execute unborn anchors as well?

U.S. court sides with illegal immigrant teen seeking an abortion
U.S. Must Let Undocumented Teenager Get an Abortion, Appeals Court Says

Just another NaziCon lie. She is paying for it - TOTALLY.

 

[NightFox]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...nice spin.

LOL, Since when is the truth "spin"? I quoted from the actual Court Decision in the story you linked in your OP.

Your thread title

U.S. Court decides taxpayers should pay to kill unborn Mexican anchor babies.

is the only "spin" since the "U.S. Court" didn't decide any such thing.

You should at least read the news story before linking it in a thread OP.

Here endth the lesson.

The OP is spot on. you're lost. that's all. see tax payers will pay for it as has already been explained in here. so sorry, you're just misguided as usual.

Uh-Huh, I see we have at least two geniuses that don't know how to read, perhaps you'd like to quote the section of the courts decision that states that the federal government was ordered to pay for the abortion as the OP claims.

On second thought don't bother, asking you to read a court order and understand what it actually says is like asking a block of granite to understand quantum physics.

 

[jc456]

The court didn't decide (nor did the plaintiff ask) that taxpayers have to pay for the abortion, just that the federal government couldn't directly or indirectly prevent her from having one.

"This case does not ask the government to make things easier for J.D. The government need not pay for J.D.’s abortion; she has that covered (with the assistance of her guardian ad litem ). The government need not transport her at any stage of the process; J.D. and her guardian ad litem have arranged for that. Government officials themselves do not even have to do any paperwork or undertake any other administrative measures. The contractor detaining J.D. has advised that it is willing to handle any necessary logistics, just as it would for medical appointments if J.D. were to continue her pregnancy."

Haha...nice spin.

LOL, Since when is the truth "spin"? I quoted from the actual Court Decision in the story you linked in your OP.

Your thread title

U.S. Court decides taxpayers should pay to kill unborn Mexican anchor babies.

is the only "spin" since the "U.S. Court" didn't decide any such thing.

You should at least read the news story before linking it in a thread OP.

Here endth the lesson.

The OP is spot on. you're lost. that's all. see tax payers will pay for it as has already been explained in here. so sorry, you're just misguided as usual.

Uh-Huh, I see we have at least two geniuses that don't know how to read, perhaps you'd like to quote the section of the courts decision that states that the federal government was ordered to pay for the abortion as the OP claims.

On second thought don't bother, asking you to read a court order and understand what it actually says is like asking a block of granite to understand quantum physics.

It doesn't matter what the fk that decision said. What it really says is that tax payers will pay for this illegal killing a human. cut it anyway you want, that is just a pure fking fact.

 

[Harry Dresden]

It only makes sense...right?
I mean why not...if Mexicans can sneak in here and be protected by filthy politicians, drop multiple anchor babies requiring a lifetime of spoon feeding in the laps of REAL Americans why not have us cover the cost to execute unborn anchors as well?

U.S. court sides with illegal immigrant teen seeking an abortion
U.S. Must Let Undocumented Teenager Get an Abortion, Appeals Court Says

Just another NaziCon lie. She is paying for it - TOTALLY.

its funny when a NaziLib calls someone else a Nazi...