Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Without horses we would not have been able to settle North America as fast as we did. How many millions of horses do you see on the freeway today? Hydrocarbons have had there run, and now we have better ways. Besides, really dumb to burn as useful of an industrial stock as oil.Without hydrocarbons, half the world's population would not exist today.
No, not at all. We survived for over 200,000 years without hydrocarbons. We have used the coral reefs for nearly that whole period.It will be much simpler for humans to survive without coral reefs than it will be to survive without hydrocarbons.
And that was 100's of millions of years in the past. So you think that we can eliminate a major factor in the ecology of the ocean worldwide without major negative effects?There was a time in earth's history when there were no coral reefs.
Yet here we are...
And here we will be long after coral reefs are dead and gone.
A couple hours after sunset, everyone is donning a wetsuit. In minutes, 15 to 20 dark figures are standing in a graveyard on the west coast of Guam. But they're not here for the tombstones. They've come to help rescue something from dying in the waters nearby — the corals. Corals along Guam's coastlines have been dying in recent years, and they're not alone. Warming seawater and increasing ocean acidity are damaging reef ecosystems around the world. Some scientists and environmentalists fear a worldwide collapse by 2050. The coral reefs we see are actually colonies of millions of tiny animals. In a single night, the corals cast a fog of sperm and eggs into the water, some of which fertilize to make baby coral larvae. And some of those larvae settle back onto the reef, making it grow. Dirk Petersen says, "OK, let's go. It's gonna be the night, guys. Spawning time." Petersen is the founder and executive director of SECORE, short for sexual coral reproduction. His mission is to gather sperm and eggs from the corals, fertilize them in the lab and return the baby corals to the wild. Think of it like IVF for the reefs.
One organization is trying to save dying reefs by fertilizing coral in the lab, like this spawning colony of Acropora digitifera.
The team divvies up the collection containers and heads to the beach. Everyone adjusts their snorkels, sharing lights so they can see what they're doing. They wade out into the water. "It's just a constant safari," says Richard Ross, a biologist with the California Academy of Sciences. "You hope you're going to see the corals spawning. And you never know if it's even going to happen." Ross and the others are focusing their efforts on this night on staghorn corals, a species that forms thickets of branching antlers. The staghorn corals have been hit hard in Guam by four years of bleaching and one episode of extremely low tides, not to mention soil runoff and heavy fishing. "A bunch of us coral reef managers were just so sick of just watching things die," says Laurie Raymundo, a biologist at the University of Guam. "And [we] really felt we want[ed] to start doing something — restore, rehabilitate — those are technical terms. The emotional terms are: 'Let's just see if we can watch something live for once.' "
This is in large part why SECORE is here. The group got its start in the Caribbean, and it has come to the Pacific to teach others its technique to restore reefs. The method depends entirely on spawn. Al Licuanan of De La Salle University in the Philippines is eagerly eyeing the water for any sign of it. He explains, "It's been described like an upside-down rain of yellow, blue, pink. You find this foamlike muck." At last, the spawning happens. A thick speckling of little white dots are swirling everywhere. This is the future of the reef. There is just one problem — it's the wrong species. The spawn is from the big Porites boulder corals, and the team doesn't have the right equipment to collect it. Petersen admits defeat. "Patience," he says. "Tomorrow is another night." The next night, they bring the right equipment, but there is not enough spawning. The following night, they try a different location, but again, there is just not enough material to collect. The spawning window has closed. It's part of what makes the work so difficult.
Corals around the world have been dying because of warming waters and pollution. Some researchers hope they can reverse the trend by growing new corals in the lab.
A couple days later, a fiery sunset lights up the sky on the west coast of Guam. Nicole Burns, a graduate student at the University of Guam, kicks her way down to a coral nursery 1,200 feet from shore. When she surfaces, she is holding a cement pyramid in her hand with a staghorn the size of a crouton growing on its surface. This baby is 2 years old and came from spawn collected at sea and fertilized onshore. It has been growing in the nursery ever since, cared for by Burns and others. "We tend to them," Burns says. "Once they're big enough, then you plant them out to be in nature and in the wild." The next day, this baby will be placed on a reef farther up the coast, which is where everyone is hoping it'll grow up to stand guard against an uncertain future.
As Corals Wither Around The World, Scientists Try IVF
Well yes, that is about when the intense warming started.Good grief, the reefs have been in trouble for 40 years.
Competing with Silly Billy for the dumbest post of the day, whitehall? The problem of the coral reefs have been highlighted by scientists for at least 20 years.
Wow, you win dumbest post of the thread, and it's not even close. As it turns out, the oceans are pretty big.Under the democrat Harry Truman administration it seemed that we blasted many of them away in non stop nuclear tests and radiated the rest.
Well yes, that is about when the intense warming started.Good grief, the reefs have been in trouble for 40 years.
What "intense" warming, you boob!
Have you told the oceanographers and the marine biologists this?!?!?!?!?!?!? WOW!!!!!!!!! Imagine how embarrassed they will all be to find that some guy who knows less than nothing about their fields of science has, without even a scintilla of scientific research or any effort at all, outsmarted them!Yes, and it turns out that more corals bleach from cold than from warmth, and the leading cause of damage is evidently from Sun Screen.
But we were not here when there were no coral reefs.There was a time in earth's history when there were no coral reefs.
Yet here we are...
More apparent is that you don't do cites or links. You do however confuse rubes with the different measures of humidity in a pointless sort of way.Yes, and it turns out that more corals bleach from cold than from warmth, and the leading cause of damage is evidently from Sun Screen. But that is what is known as a fact, and we all know you 'tards don't do facts.
