U B the Jury

[JaCo]

If a person files a discrimination lawsuit claiming that the defendants used hazardous chemicals and poisonous insects to cause a disability which ineffect causes a termination of employment because it happens to blacks, females, and older persons how would you judge?


The Plaintiff was not allowed to talk to witness. The Plaintiff was not allowed to test chemicals.

The Defendants alleged that it is all in the Plaintiff's head.

No materials facts submitted.

The Court rules that the Defendants did not discriminate.

What would you do? Ignore the Judgment because it is illegal or appeals?

 

[Mr. H.]

You're on 'er. The prostitution rests.

 

[goldcatt]

If a person files a discrimination lawsuit claiming that the defendants used hazardous chemicals and poisonous insects to cause a disability which ineffect causes a termination of employment because it happens to blacks, females, and older persons how would you judge?


The Plaintiff was not allowed to talk to witness. The Plaintiff was not allowed to test chemicals.

The Defendants alleged that it is all in the Plaintiff's head.

No materials facts submitted.

The Court rules that the Defendants did not discriminate.

What would you do? Ignore the Judgment because it is illegal or appeals?

Got to have a lot more facts than that to even start guessing, sorry.

I'm curious though, how does an employer use poisonous insects in a discriminatory manner?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

I'm wondering why the judge didn't dismiss the case when he found out no material facts were going to be submitted. How can he issue a ruling without evidence?

 

[washamericom]

If a person files a discrimination lawsuit claiming that the defendants used hazardous chemicals and poisonous insects to cause a disability which ineffect causes a termination of employment because it happens to blacks, females, and older persons how would you judge?


The Plaintiff was not allowed to talk to witness. The Plaintiff was not allowed to test chemicals.

The Defendants alleged that it is all in the Plaintiff's head.

No materials facts submitted.

The Court rules that the Defendants did not discriminate.

What would you do? Ignore the Judgment because it is illegal or appeals?

why don't you start by telling the story... it sounds interesting.