U B the Jury

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by JaCo, Nov 11, 2010.

?

What would you do

Poll closed Dec 11, 2010.
  1. Ignore the judgment because it is illegal?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Appeal the judgment because that is the only way to go?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. JaCo
    Offline

    JaCo Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    If a person files a discrimination lawsuit claiming that the defendants used hazardous chemicals and poisonous insects to cause a disability which ineffect causes a termination of employment because it happens to blacks, females, and older persons how would you judge?


    The Plaintiff was not allowed to talk to witness. The Plaintiff was not allowed to test chemicals.

    The Defendants alleged that it is all in the Plaintiff's head.

    No materials facts submitted.

    The Court rules that the Defendants did not discriminate.

    What would you do? Ignore the Judgment because it is illegal or appeals?
     
  2. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    You're on 'er. The prostitution rests.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. goldcatt
    Offline

    goldcatt Catch me if you can! Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    10,330
    Thanks Received:
    2,331
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    CentralPA
    Ratings:
    +2,331
    Got to have a lot more facts than that to even start guessing, sorry.

    I'm curious though, how does an employer use poisonous insects in a discriminatory manner?
     
  4. Rat in the Hat
    Offline

    Rat in the Hat Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,950
    Thanks Received:
    5,147
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +5,215
    I'm wondering why the judge didn't dismiss the case when he found out no material facts were going to be submitted. How can he issue a ruling without evidence?
     
  5. washamericom
    Offline

    washamericom Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2010
    Messages:
    9,383
    Thanks Received:
    735
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,701
    why don't you start by telling the story... it sounds interesting.
     

Share This Page