Tyrant Obama Admin: Files lawsuit to force Boeing to use union labor!!! WOW!!

bucs90

Gold Member
Feb 25, 2010
26,545
6,027
280
Boeing lawsuit: South Carolina vs. big labor | The Post and Courier, Charleston SC - News, Sports, Entertainment

My God, are we now the USSA?? (For stupid libs, thats akin to USSR, which to also add, is bad).

The Obama Admin has now filed a lawsuit against Boeing. Why? Boeing was tired of dealing with unions in Seattle. So, they took their new Dreamliner production planet, and built it in non-union North Charleston, South Caroline, bringing 5,000-8,000 good paying jobs to the area. The planet in SC is almost finished, with work about to start.

Now Tyrant Obama has filed a federal lawsuit claiming, get this, DISCRIMINATION!!!! They say Boeing is discriminating against union workers.....by daring build a plant in non-union South Carolina. Our federal government is trying to force a private company to use their preferred labor pool. The lawsuit seeks to force Boeing to relocate that new plant in SC back to Seattle.

Never in my wildest imagination could I have thought the United States government would begin filing lawsuits to force a private company to locate it's operations in the politicially preferred choice of the US government. It's basically a political assault on right wing South Carolina. Tyrant tactics, no doubt about it. Chicago thuggery in plain sight.

So now, even if Boeing wins that lawsuit, which they will, Boeing is gonna have to shell out millions of dollars to defend this suit.

Is this how Obama's Admin is gonna do business? SUE companies that provide jobs....for daring not use union labor? Punish states that voted against him with lawsuits against any non-union company within it's borders?

How anyone can continue to support Tyrant Obama baffles me.
 
Unsurprisingly, spectard can't tell the difference between an independent company and government employees.

Next week, Obama will announce the roll out of 5 Year Plans.
 
Obama is acting MORE like Hugo Chavez every day.

But don't you dare call him a Fascist Marxist.
 
Boeing lawsuit: South Carolina vs. big labor | The Post and Courier, Charleston SC - News, Sports, Entertainment

My God, are we now the USSA?? (For stupid libs, thats akin to USSR, which to also add, is bad).

The Obama Admin has now filed a lawsuit against Boeing. Why? Boeing was tired of dealing with unions in Seattle. So, they took their new Dreamliner production planet, and built it in non-union North Charleston, South Caroline, bringing 5,000-8,000 good paying jobs to the area. The planet in SC is almost finished, with work about to start.

Now Tyrant Obama has filed a federal lawsuit claiming, get this, DISCRIMINATION!!!! They say Boeing is discriminating against union workers.....by daring build a plant in non-union South Carolina. Our federal government is trying to force a private company to use their preferred labor pool. The lawsuit seeks to force Boeing to relocate that new plant in SC back to Seattle.

Never in my wildest imagination could I have thought the United States government would begin filing lawsuits to force a private company to locate it's operations in the politicially preferred choice of the US government. It's basically a political assault on right wing South Carolina. Tyrant tactics, no doubt about it. Chicago thuggery in plain sight.

So now, even if Boeing wins that lawsuit, which they will, Boeing is gonna have to shell out millions of dollars to defend this suit.

Is this how Obama's Admin is gonna do business? SUE companies that provide jobs....for daring not use union labor? Punish states that voted against him with lawsuits against any non-union company within it's borders?

How anyone can continue to support Tyrant Obama baffles me.

I said long ago obama is a evil fascist pig and socialist.I HATE him!
I consider him a traitor to our constitution.
 
how mentally ill do you have to be to want to use scabs instead of union labor.

well now, you just called MILLIONS of COMMON FOLKS scabs.

this folks is WHAT lefties AND Democrats THINK OF YOU.
 
I know it boggles the mind doesn't it. The more efficient way would be to do like Reagan did with the air traffic controlers.

Your rotted liberal brain missed a few key differences:

1- The air traffic employees are GOVERNMENT employees, thus, under Reagan's charge. And those employees refused to come to work. So he fired them.

2- Boeing is a PRIVATE company. So long they follow laws, they can operate their business anywhere they please, and hire anyone they want. They chose South Carolina over Seattle. Now, Tyrant Obama is punishing them for that move.

Is that more clear now?
 
how mentally ill do you have to be to want to use scabs instead of union labor.

what barn did you grow up in?

wackos.

So the citizen's of South Carolina are scabs? Boeing built a NEW plant in non-union South Carolina. That plant is NEW. No union labor has worked in THAT plant. Boeing is bringing 8,000 jobs to that state. Those people love Boeing and those jobs.

Now Obama punishes Boeing for that move? Didn't Obama preach "shared responsibility"? Well, we have an economic and job issue. Boeing is making jobs. Aren't we all sharing the responsibility for hiring union AND non-union workers? Or does Obama think ONLY union workers deserve employment?

You liberals are fucking fascists. Punishing a private company for daring to create jobs!!??
 
I know it boggles the mind doesn't it. The more efficient way would be to do like Reagan did with the air traffic controlers.


I don't see the parallel. The Air Traffic controllers were acting outside the law. Reagan informed them of this and warned them that if they did not return to work, he would find people who would work.

Why do Liberals not see Facism where it does exist, but do see it where it doesn't?
 
I know it boggles the mind doesn't it. The more efficient way would be to do like Reagan did with the air traffic controlers.


I don't see the parallel. The Air Traffic controllers were acting outside the law. Reagan informed them of this and warned them that if they did not return to work, he would find people who would work.

Why do Liberals not see Facism where it does exist, but do see it where it doesn't?

Reagan committed treason, violated the Constitution and was a terrible president.

His handling of the the Air Traffic controller's situation probably is one of the factors that contributed to 9/11.
 
how mentally ill do you have to be to want to use scabs instead of union labor.

what barn did you grow up in?

wackos.


Just a quick note from reality: Scabs are those who cross strike lines to work in place of union labor who have abandoned their jobs.

The mentally ill you refer to include most companies that have displaced the US companies as the leaders in their fields: Toyota, Honda, Kia, Hyundai, Suburu, Isuzu and the list goes on and on.

Unions promote a lack of competitive spirit and this is revealed by the fact that unions reside in non-competitve organizations.
 
I know it boggles the mind doesn't it. The more efficient way would be to do like Reagan did with the air traffic controlers.


I don't see the parallel. The Air Traffic controllers were acting outside the law. Reagan informed them of this and warned them that if they did not return to work, he would find people who would work.

Why do Liberals not see Facism where it does exist, but do see it where it doesn't?

Reagan committed treason, violated the Constitution and was a terrible president.

His handling of the the Air Traffic controller's situation probably is one of the factors that contributed to 9/11.

Apples and oranges. Plus, that was 20 years ago.

Now, do you have a comment regarding the current tyrant in the White House that has directed the federal gov't to punish private company Boeing for not using it's preferred source of labor?

I thought Obama said we're all responsible for each other? Well, Boeing is doing it's part to create jobs. Why is Obama punishing them with a federal lawsuit?
 
I don't see the parallel. The Air Traffic controllers were acting outside the law. Reagan informed them of this and warned them that if they did not return to work, he would find people who would work.

Why do Liberals not see Facism where it does exist, but do see it where it doesn't?

Reagan committed treason, violated the Constitution and was a terrible president.

His handling of the the Air Traffic controller's situation probably is one of the factors that contributed to 9/11.

Apples and oranges. Plus, that was 20 years ago.

Now, do you have a comment regarding the current tyrant in the White House that has directed the federal gov't to punish private company Boeing for not using it's preferred source of labor?

I thought Obama said we're all responsible for each other? Well, Boeing is doing it's part to create jobs. Why is Obama punishing them with a federal lawsuit?

What apple and oranges?

Boeing gets a good amount of government pork. If their workers want Union..they should go Union. Simple as that.
 
Boeing lawsuit: South Carolina vs. big labor | The Post and Courier, Charleston SC - News, Sports, Entertainment

My God, are we now the USSA?? (For stupid libs, thats akin to USSR, which to also add, is bad).

The Obama Admin has now filed a lawsuit against Boeing. Why? Boeing was tired of dealing with unions in Seattle. So, they took their new Dreamliner production planet, and built it in non-union North Charleston, South Caroline, bringing 5,000-8,000 good paying jobs to the area. The planet in SC is almost finished, with work about to start.

Now Tyrant Obama has filed a federal lawsuit claiming, get this, DISCRIMINATION!!!! They say Boeing is discriminating against union workers.....by daring build a plant in non-union South Carolina. Our federal government is trying to force a private company to use their preferred labor pool. The lawsuit seeks to force Boeing to relocate that new plant in SC back to Seattle.

Never in my wildest imagination could I have thought the United States government would begin filing lawsuits to force a private company to locate it's operations in the politicially preferred choice of the US government. It's basically a political assault on right wing South Carolina. Tyrant tactics, no doubt about it. Chicago thuggery in plain sight.

So now, even if Boeing wins that lawsuit, which they will, Boeing is gonna have to shell out millions of dollars to defend this suit.

Is this how Obama's Admin is gonna do business? SUE companies that provide jobs....for daring not use union labor? Punish states that voted against him with lawsuits against any non-union company within it's borders?

How anyone can continue to support Tyrant Obama baffles me.

The "Obama Administration" did not file the lawsuit.

The lawsuit was triggered by a March 2010 complaint from the IAMAW, which has engaged in five strikes against Boeing between 1977 and 2008.

The NLRB said its investigation found that the company violated two sections of the National Labor Relations Act in 2009 when it picked Charleston International Airport as the site of its second 787 assembly plant, rather than expanding its existing factory in Everett.

Get your facts straight before you go off half-cocked.
 
Last edited:
Reagan committed treason, violated the Constitution and was a terrible president.

His handling of the the Air Traffic controller's situation probably is one of the factors that contributed to 9/11.

Apples and oranges. Plus, that was 20 years ago.

Now, do you have a comment regarding the current tyrant in the White House that has directed the federal gov't to punish private company Boeing for not using it's preferred source of labor?

I thought Obama said we're all responsible for each other? Well, Boeing is doing it's part to create jobs. Why is Obama punishing them with a federal lawsuit?

What apple and oranges?

Boeing gets a good amount of government pork. If their workers want Union..they should go Union. Simple as that.

It doesn't matter what their workers want. It's what Boeing wants. Boeing wanted Charleston labor instead of Seattle labor. 8,000 Charlestonians lined up and applauded that non-union job Boeing offered. Everyone was happy, Boeing and Charleston workers.

Then Obama sued.

Is that how YOU want our gov't to work? Sue companies for not using the labor the gov't thinks they should? You know thats called tyranny, not freedom, right?
 
Apples and oranges. Plus, that was 20 years ago.

Now, do you have a comment regarding the current tyrant in the White House that has directed the federal gov't to punish private company Boeing for not using it's preferred source of labor?

I thought Obama said we're all responsible for each other? Well, Boeing is doing it's part to create jobs. Why is Obama punishing them with a federal lawsuit?

What apple and oranges?

Boeing gets a good amount of government pork. If their workers want Union..they should go Union. Simple as that.

It doesn't matter what their workers want. It's what Boeing wants. Boeing wanted Charleston labor instead of Seattle labor. 8,000 Charlestonians lined up and applauded that non-union job Boeing offered. Everyone was happy, Boeing and Charleston workers.

Then Obama sued.

Is that how YOU want our gov't to work? Sue companies for not using the labor the gov't thinks they should? You know thats called tyranny, not freedom, right?

Actually no.

I want government to stop giving private industry tax payer money.

I want government to stop butting in on labor/management issues.

You?
 
Boeing lawsuit: South Carolina vs. big labor | The Post and Courier, Charleston SC - News, Sports, Entertainment

My God, are we now the USSA?? (For stupid libs, thats akin to USSR, which to also add, is bad).

The Obama Admin has now filed a lawsuit against Boeing. Why? Boeing was tired of dealing with unions in Seattle. So, they took their new Dreamliner production planet, and built it in non-union North Charleston, South Caroline, bringing 5,000-8,000 good paying jobs to the area. The planet in SC is almost finished, with work about to start.

Now Tyrant Obama has filed a federal lawsuit claiming, get this, DISCRIMINATION!!!! They say Boeing is discriminating against union workers.....by daring build a plant in non-union South Carolina. Our federal government is trying to force a private company to use their preferred labor pool. The lawsuit seeks to force Boeing to relocate that new plant in SC back to Seattle.

Never in my wildest imagination could I have thought the United States government would begin filing lawsuits to force a private company to locate it's operations in the politicially preferred choice of the US government. It's basically a political assault on right wing South Carolina. Tyrant tactics, no doubt about it. Chicago thuggery in plain sight.

So now, even if Boeing wins that lawsuit, which they will, Boeing is gonna have to shell out millions of dollars to defend this suit.

Is this how Obama's Admin is gonna do business? SUE companies that provide jobs....for daring not use union labor? Punish states that voted against him with lawsuits against any non-union company within it's borders?

How anyone can continue to support Tyrant Obama baffles me.

The "Obama Administration" did not file the lawsuit.

The lawsuit was triggered by a March 2010 complaint from the IAMAW, which has engaged in five strikes against Boeing between 1977 and 2008.

The NLRB said its investigation found that the company violated two sections of the National Labor Relations Act in 2009 when it picked Charleston International Airport as the site of its second 787 assembly plant, rather than expanding its existing factory in Everett.

Get your facts straight before you go off half-cocked.

Hey dipshit, Obama is the head of the Federal Government. When the Federal Government does something, it's under the president's watch.

Thats like saying the Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys didn't lose the game since he wasn't playing in it.

Obama knew about, and approved, this federal lawsuit. He COULD stop it......if he thinks we are really "shared responsibility". After all, wouldnt Obama want those 8,000 SC residents employed? Wouldn't he want Boeing using their $$ to hire workers rather than defend lawsuits? Guess not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top