typical liberal

tissue?

music-notes-tissue-box.jpg
 
Dem. Rep. Favoring Civility Calls Romney D-Bag | Washington Free Beacon

Ellison, a vociferous proponent of civil discourse, subsequently promoted the message despite said calls for civil discourse.

Yep that's a liberal alright, BS about civility right into the personal attacks!

Democrats crying :clap2::clap2::clap2:

They deserve every bit of what they have dished out. By my account were good for a few free assaults. If I add the responsibility for the border agent, it gets ugly.
 
DEM. REP. FAVORING CIVILITY CALLS ROMNEY D-BAG

I read the article, seems like he didn't call Mitt a douche bag. Why is this a story?
 
Ellison had promoted that comment as recently as this morning, but apparently in response a Free Beacon report on the matter, the congressman has deleted his association with the message.


He got caught, NOW he's becoming civil.....
 
He shouldn't have said it but I wonder why he was being so nice.

because liberals hide from issues. They change meanings of words, or use euphamisms. They wont tell you what they really want to do. They dont like people knowing what's in the laws they pass.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQoOMmJxUqg]STUPID NANCY PELOSI "WE HAVE TO PASS THE HEALTHCARE BILL BEFORE WE KNOW WHATS IN IT". ??? - YouTube[/ame]
 
If he cannot "retweet" without including vulgarity, he needs to stay off Twitter.
 
LIberal Nostalgia for the Good Ol' Days of Conservatism

6/15/12 By Jonah Goldberg

My daughter learned a neat rhetorical trick to avoid eating things she doesn't like. "Daddy, I actually really like spinach, it's just that this spinach tastes different."

Democrats and the journalists who love them play a similar game with Republicans and conservatives. "Oh, I have lots of respect for conservatives," goes the typical line, "but the conservatives we're being served today are just so different. Why can't we have Republicans and conservatives like we used to?"

Q: What kind of Republicans are extremists, racists, ideologues, pyschopaths, radicals, weirdos, hicks, idiots, elitists, prudes, potato chip double-dippers and meanies?

A: Today's Republicans.

"The Republican Party got into its time machine and took a giant leap back into the '50s. The party left moderation and tolerance of dissent behind." So reported the Washington Post's Judy Mann -- in July of 1980.

Today, of course, the 1950s is the belle epoch of reasonable conservatism. Just ask New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, or for that matter, President Barack Obama, who insists that the GOP is in the throes of a "fever" and is displaying signs of "madness." It's his humble wish that the GOP regains its senses and returns to being the party of Eisenhower again.

Today's intellectual conservatives, likewise, are held against the standard of yesterday's and found wanting. New York Times Book Review editor Sam Tanenhaus wrote a book on "The Death of Conservatism" a few years ago (inconveniently, right before conservatism was dramatically revivified by the Tea Party, which helped the GOP win historic victories in the 2010 elections) in which he pined for the conservative intellectuals of the 1950s and 1960s.

Of course, the Tanenhauses of their day were horrified by the very same conservative intellectuals. Within a year of William F. Buckley's founding of National Review in 1955, liberal intellectuals insisted that the magazine's biggest failure was its inability to be authentically conservative. The editor of Harper's proclaimed the founding editors of NR to be "the very opposite of conservatives." Liberal titan Dwight Macdonald lamented that the "pseudo-conservative" National Review was nowhere near as wonderful the old Freeman magazine.

Again and again, the line is the same: I like conservatives, just not these conservatives.

---
Read More: LIberal Nostalgia for the Good Ol' Days of Conservatism - Jonah Goldberg - Townhall Conservative Columnists - Page 1
 
Liberal Bigotry

8/9/12
By Jerry Shenk

---

For decades, the American left has aggressively attempted to redefine constitutionally enumerated rights to favor one or more groups over others. If the Declaration of Independence were to be rewritten by today's liberals, it might begin something like this:

American progressives hold these truths to be self-evident:

•All cultures and religions are equally meritorious (except for Christianity)
•There is no objective truth (until and unless progressives declare the truth)
•You cannot legislate morality (Therefore, everything is "moral" -- except Christian morality)
•Progressives celebrate diversity and are tolerant, inclusive, and accepting of all fellow humans (except conservative, white and Christian people)
•Progressives are intelligent, thoughtful, reality-based, and benevolent

Objective? Diverse? Inclusive? Thoughtful? Reality-based? Benevolent? Not really. Progressives -- liberals -- are the worst offenders of their own axioms when they talk about the "evils" of those who dispute liberal versions of facts, policy, or, especially, morality. The bigotry liberals direct toward those with whom they merely disagree is staggering.

---

Read more: Articles: Liberal Bigotry
 
Last edited:
Dem. Rep. Favoring Civility Calls Romney D-Bag | Washington Free Beacon

Ellison, a vociferous proponent of civil discourse, subsequently promoted the message despite said calls for civil discourse.

Yep that's a liberal alright, BS about civility right into the personal attacks!

So the thread title and the article title is lie?
And is spreading BS here?
Should a congressman have to answer for what someone said on twitter? Why do you guys even post this bullshit? It adds noting.
 
Dem. Rep. Favoring Civility Calls Romney D-Bag | Washington Free Beacon

Ellison, a vociferous proponent of civil discourse, subsequently promoted the message despite said calls for civil discourse.

Yep that's a liberal alright, BS about civility right into the personal attacks!

Retweets = Endorsement???

UPDATE at 12:24: Rep. Ellison’s Communications Director Jennifer Porter Gore responds, “As with all Twitter accounts a retweet is not an endorsement. The congressman removed the tweet because it appeared to endorse use of a nasty term, which is not what we wanted.”
 
Dem. Rep. Favoring Civility Calls Romney D-Bag | Washington Free Beacon

Ellison, a vociferous proponent of civil discourse, subsequently promoted the message despite said calls for civil discourse.

Yep that's a liberal alright, BS about civility right into the personal attacks!

Retweets = Endorsement???

UPDATE at 12:24: Rep. Ellison’s Communications Director Jennifer Porter Gore responds, “As with all Twitter accounts a retweet is not an endorsement. The congressman removed the tweet because it appeared to endorse use of a nasty term, which is not what we wanted.”

Of course one could realize the mistake, but the people who love faux outrage don't like to do that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top