Two Stories About Medicaid

[Spare_change]

We all know our entitlement system is unsustainable. With Medicaid, that’s especially true since enrollment has exploded under the Obama era. President Obama made this program, designed for the working poor, and integral part of his health care overhaul. Most of the new enrollees are able-bodied adults, who don’t work, siphoning money from those who actually need the assistance. This is not to say that Medicaid is a great program; it’s not. Yet, it provides something for needy, despite those who are uninsured having a better chance of surviving a surgical procedure. Of course, those with private insurance fared the best. Still, while you can make the case that Medicaid should be totally torn down, the political powers that be will not allow it. There are ways to fix it, but that will never happen if we don’t require these enrollees to work. As the Foundation for Government Accountability found out, the lack of work requirements has enabled Medicaid expansion to serve as a honey trap to keep people dependent on government:

Medicaid spending and enrollment has skyrocketed in recent years, crowding out resources for all other state priorities.The number of people dependent on Medicaid has more than doubled since 2000, with nearly 75 million individuals currently enrolled in the program. Nowhere is this growth more evident than among able-bodied adults. Nearly 28 million able-bodied adults are now dependent on the program, up from fewer than 7 million in 2000.

This enrollment explosion is fueling a massive spending surge. Total Medicaid spending has nearly tripled since 2000 and spending on able-bodied adults has increased by a jaw-dropping 700 percent.

Many major welfare programs require able-bodied adults to participate in at least some level of “work activity” in order to maintain eligibility. For example, able-bodied, childless adults on food stamps must work, train, or volunteer at least 20 hours per week in order to receive benefits. Able-bodied adults with children are required to register for work and not turn down job offers in order to keep their benefits. Even the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash assistance program requires parents to engage in some level of work- related activities. Both programs also incorporate time limits on benefits

But when it comes to work requirements, Medicaid is well outside the mainstream. Able- bodied adults can enroll without any requirements related to work or time limits. As long as they keep their incomes below certain thresholds, they can receive Medicaid welfare indefinitely. Without this requirement in place, most able-bodied adults in Medicaid do not work at all.

PROOF: Most able-bodied adults on Medicaid do not work at all

Despite the fact that Medicaid’s able-bodied adults have no physical disabilities keeping them from pursuing gainful employment, very few actually work full-time jobs.14 According to the Census Bureau, most non-disabled adults on Medicaid do not work at all.

PROOF: Many ObamaCare expansion enrollees do not work at all.

Further evidence from states that expanded Medicaid through ObamaCare suggests the problem is even more widespread than just traditional Medicaid. In Michigan, half of all able-bodied adults in the expansion are not working. In Illinois, 54 percent of expansion adults report no income at all. In Ohio, 57 percent of able-bodied adults enrolled in the ObamaCare expansion are not working. In New Hampshire, 58 percent of enrollees do not work at all. And in Nevada, a staggering 60 percent of enrollees report no income.

Shocker: New Study Shows How Medicaid Has Become A Honey Trap For Government Dependency

 

[Spare_change]

Lastly, when it comes to overall care, Forbes’ Avik Roy has described Medicaid as a “humanitarian catastrophe” in 2011. For starters, on average, those who enrolled in Medicaid actually fare worse than Americans who remain uninsured.

Last July, I wrote about a landmark study conducted at the University of Virginia that found that surgical patients on Medicaid are 13 percent more likely to die than those without insurance of any kind. The study evaluated 893,658 major surgical operations from around the country from 2003 to 2007, and normalized the results for age, gender, income, geographic region, operation, and 30 background diseases.


Despite all of these adjustments, surgical patients on Medicaid were nearly twice as likely to die before leaving the hospital than those with private insurance.

Patients on Medicare were 45% more likely to die than those with private insurance; the uninsured were 74% more likely; and Medicaid patients 93% more likely. That is to say, despite the fact that we will soon spend more than $500 billion a year on Medicaid, Medicaid beneficiaries, on average, fared worse than those with no insurance at all.

Matt Vespa - Friendly Reminder: Medicaid Is A 'Humanitarian Catastrophe'