Twitter is Biased???

[SAYIT]

Oops. Rep Nunes sues Twitter for $250mil in VA state court for blatant anti-conservative bias.

Devin Nunes sues Twitter over conservative ‘shadow bans’

 

[Crepitus]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

 

[SAYIT]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.
Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

Whistling past the graveyard. Nunes is going for a jury trial but may settle for an admission of guilt and guarantees to change their foul ways. Stay tuned.

 

[skye]

Good!!!

 

[WillowTree]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

So was that cake shop hey? Who did you champion? The gay couple or the baker?

 

[beagle9]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

Baking a cake doesn't represent a platform that has the ability to affect millions of citizens in a biased brain washing way like a Facebook or Twitter might have.

The government should be concerned if a platform comes off as an open forum for the supporting and protection of the 1st amendment right to free speech (but no yelling fire in a crowded theater of course), for all who use the platform, but finds instead that it has agreed to help squash that right if their personal ideology is for squashing that right against it's majority user base.

 

[Crepitus]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.
Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

Whistling past the graveyard. Nunes is going for a jury trial but may settle for an admission of guilt and guarantees to change their foul ways. Stay tuned.

He can whistle wherever he wants it still isnt going anywhere.

 

[Crepitus]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

So was that cake shop hey? Who did you champion? The gay couple or the baker?

The gay couple. Just think, if you kids hadn't fought it so had you might actually have a leg to stand on.

Lol.

 

[WillowTree]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

So was that cake shop hey? Who did you champion? The gay couple or the baker?

The gay couple. Just think, if you kids hadn't fought it so had you might actually have a leg to stand on.

Lol.

You bee hypocrite!

 

[Crepitus]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

Baking a cake doesn't represent a platform that has the ability to affect millions of citizens in a biased brain washing way like a Facebook or Twitter might have.

The government should be concerned if a platform comes off as an open forum for the supporting and protection of the 1st amendment right to free speech (but no yelling fire in a crowded theater of course), for all who use the platform, but finds instead that it has agreed to help squash that right if their personal ideology is for squashing that right against it's majority user base.

Private business is private business.

 

[SAYIT]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.
Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

Whistling past the graveyard. Nunes is going for a jury trial but may settle for an admission of guilt and guarantees to change their foul ways. Stay tuned.

He can whistle wherever he wants it still isnt going anywhere.

Woo … it's you who is whistling past the graveyard. I'm certain Twitter is taking very seriously the $250 mil suit brought by a US congressmen.

 

[Crepitus]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

So was that cake shop hey? Who did you champion? The gay couple or the baker?

The gay couple. Just think, if you kids hadn't fought it so had you might actually have a leg to stand on.

Lol.

You bee hypocrite!

No, I bee correct.

 

[Crepitus]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.
Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

Whistling past the graveyard. Nunes is going for a jury trial but may settle for an admission of guilt and guarantees to change their foul ways. Stay tuned.

He can whistle wherever he wants it still isnt going anywhere.

Woo … it's you who is whistling past the graveyard. I'm certain Twitter is taking very seriously the $250 mil suit brought by a US congressmen.

It's a nuisance suit, a publicity stunt. Nothing more.

 

[WillowTree]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

So was that cake shop hey? Who did you champion? The gay couple or the baker?

The gay couple. Just think, if you kids hadn't fought it so had you might actually have a leg to stand on.

Lol.

You bee hypocrite!

No, I bee correct.

Nope! You bee hypocrite!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

'In that guise, Twitter’s “shadow banning” and the permission it grants to those posting defamatory content against conservatives leave the company liable just as a more traditional media outlet could be, the lawsuit argues. “Shadow banning” is a method through which the audience for a user’s tweets is limited.

“Twitter knew the defamation was (and is) happening,” the lawsuit said. “Twitter let it happen because Twitter had (and has) a political agenda and motive: Twitter allowed (and allows) its platform to serve as a portal of defamation in order to undermine public confidence in plaintiff and to benefit his opponents and opponents of the Republican…' ibid

Nonsense.

Talk about rightwing snowflakes…

The reason why there’s no ‘public confidence’ in rightwing political doctrine and dogma is because it’s completely devoid of merit; indeed, much of what the right attempts to propagate is fake news, lies, and wrongheaded conservative ideology.

Conservatives are simply losing in the private free marketplace of ideas and debate, rejected by the majority of the American people – and appropriately so.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Not going anywhere. Twitter is a private company. They can decided who they want using their service.

Unless you're ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes?

You don't even realize your hypocrisy.

 

[Aletheia4u]