Twitter CEO Lies That He Can't Afford To Be Neutral.....As If He Ever Was In The First Place

Discussion in 'Media' started by mudwhistle, Feb 12, 2019.

  1. mudwhistle
    Online

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    84,685
    Thanks Received:
    15,659
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    Clarksville, TN...Born in Missoula MT
    Ratings:
    +49,460
    The ends justify the means........


    Twitter CEO Dorsey: ‘We Can’t Afford to Be Neutral Anymore’

    [​IMG]

    Twitter has rescinded and apologized for many of its bans and suspensions of conservative users, calling those decisions “mistakes.” But they might not have been mistakes after all.

    In an interview with podcaster Sam Harris on February 5, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was grilled about the way “Twitter reliably lands on one side of the political divide.” Harris questioned Dorsey about Twitter’s decision to ban feminist Megan Murphy for tweeting “Men are not women,” while ignoring Rev. Louis Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic tweets.

    Dorsey responded immediately to Harris’ questions, saying “I don’t believe that we can afford to take a neutral stance anymore. I don’t believe that we should optimize for neutrality.”:hmpf:

    When Harris dug in further and asked why Twitter would not just stand by the First Amendment, banning all violent conversation but letting everything else stand, Dorsey tried to dodge the question. He argued that while Twitter’s policies where “the spirit of” the First Amendment.
    :huh1:


    Harris commented that there was a “pervasive sense that [Twitter’s] response is biased politically.” He also remarked that it was odd that Twitter allowed the terrorist groups Hezbollah and Hamas to have accounts, but banned alt-right figures for life.

    Dorsey offered some commentary on Megan Murphy’s Twitter ban, saying, “The case you brought up. I’m not sure what was behind that, but I certainly don’t believe it was that one tweet.” He then said that people who got banned or suspended usually were guilty of multiple offenses.

    Dorsey stated that Twitter could be impartial by having a list of rules, explaining the consequences for breaking the rules, and installing an appeals system that actually worked.

    But political neutrality was simply off the table. “Ultimately, I don’t think we can be this neutral, passive platform anymore,” he said.

    Harris then asked more about Twitter’s policy banning “deadnaming” a transgender person, or calling a transgender person by their original name. Dorsey evaded the question, saying, “I don’t know the exact specifics of that policy.” *LOL*
    :iyfyus.jpg:

    Twitter CEO Dorsey: ‘We Can’t Afford to Be Neutral Anymore’
     
  2. BlackFlag
    Offline

    BlackFlag Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2014
    Messages:
    20,739
    Thanks Received:
    1,779
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    America
    Ratings:
    +15,019
    Too bad conservatives hate education and innovation or they could make a competitor to twitter
     
  3. gipper
    Online

    gipper Libertarian/Anarchist

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    27,133
    Thanks Received:
    5,248
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +28,133
    He should put his money where his mouth is and ban Trump.
     
  4. Jackson
    Offline

    Jackson Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2010
    Messages:
    24,496
    Thanks Received:
    5,859
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +17,879
    If he would just apply the constitution in all cases, it would be fair. Is that too hard, Dorsey?
     

Share This Page